Author Topic: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17  (Read 48618 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #210 on: April 06, 2017, 09:35:03 PM »

Offline apc

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4310
  • Tommy Points: 437
Who else smells a comeback brewing?

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #211 on: April 06, 2017, 09:36:10 PM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Sam Jones
  • **********************
  • Posts: 22095
  • Tommy Points: 1775
Honestly, it might be best for us to get bounced in the first round this year. That way at least Danny knows that we're nowhere near close to where we need to be, and we need to keep our assets.

The display of basketball that we've put on the court lately is just putrid.
getting bounced in the first round would not be best... at all.

Eh, obviously it's not the most ideal option, but it at least gives Danny a clear route to head in.

I just don't think this team has the makeup or essential composition to be a true contender. We're too small, too soft (inexplicably), and too limited.
i dont think ainge is sitting there right now, not understanding the problems of this team.

Are you sure?

Because this guy also said we didn't need a rebounder that wasn't a skilled player during the All-Star Break. How exactly are our skilled bigs working out for us right now? Horford  has 0 pts and 1 rebound; KO has 2 pts (on 5 shots) and 4 rebounds, but he's been atrocious pretty much everywhere else.

But that's not what I'm saying anyways. Danny has been torn between working towards the future and making us better right now. A first round loss again would at least pretty much move us solely towards building for the future rather than getting better right now and marginally improving an inherently flawed team.

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. we have been working towards the future the last 4 years! why stop now? we are nowhere where we need to be. F A C T !
LET'S GO CELTICS!

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #212 on: April 06, 2017, 09:36:40 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8672
  • Tommy Points: 848
Honestly, it might be best for us to get bounced in the first round this year. That way at least Danny knows that we're nowhere near close to where we need to be, and we need to keep our assets.

The display of basketball that we've put on the court lately is just putrid.
getting bounced in the first round would not be best... at all.

Eh, obviously it's not the most ideal option, but it at least gives Danny a clear route to head in.

I just don't think this team has the makeup or essential composition to be a true contender. We're too small, too soft (inexplicably), and too limited.
i dont think ainge is sitting there right now, not understanding the problems of this team.

Are you sure?

Because this guy also said we didn't need a rebounder that wasn't a skilled player during the All-Star Break. How exactly are our skilled bigs working out for us right now? Horford  has 0 pts and 1 rebound; KO has 2 pts (on 5 shots) and 4 rebounds, but he's been atrocious pretty much everywhere else.

But that's not what I'm saying anyways. Danny has been torn between working towards the future and making us better right now. A first round loss again would at least pretty much move us solely towards building for the future rather than getting better right now and marginally improving an inherently flawed team.
if Ainge wanted to marginally improve the team he would have added the big man you constantly Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline. about him not adding.

If Ainge even felt we were that close to a title he would have gone in and overpaid for Butler or George.

Instead Ainge concluded that we were far enough away that adding a big or a swing at the deadline was pointless because we werent competing anyway. He also clearly felt the risk-reward of trading away the future for a star to chase a title this year was unwise.

wanting the team to lose in the first round is an emotional reaction to an emarassing stretch of 6 quarters.

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #213 on: April 06, 2017, 09:37:01 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45914
  • Tommy Points: 3340
Top lottery odds takes a step forward.  Nets lose.  Magic # is 1.

Amazing we as fans both can moan about a 50-win team not living up to expectations and also bask in the glow of having the best draft odds.

50 win team and best odds for the 1st pick is a good place to be. I think Brad needs to give some burn to Zeller, Green, Brown and JJ. Bradley needs to take a seat.

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #214 on: April 06, 2017, 09:37:15 PM »

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8672
  • Tommy Points: 848
Who else smells a comeback brewing?
I expect a much better second half, but I expected one last night so...

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #215 on: April 06, 2017, 09:37:23 PM »

Online Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21232
  • Tommy Points: 2451
My God, KO, at least freaking attempt to guard!

I'll  be so glad when you're frustrating some other team's fans next year.

I'm not sure D League fans get frustrated.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #216 on: April 06, 2017, 09:38:41 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
I am just really confused.

This is a team that used to be great defensively, and they are horrendous now.  What changed?

They started to believe the hype and lost the chip on their shoulders.

Mike

Honestly I am starting to believe that.  There is zero effort and zero toughness by this team.

It's really the only explanation that makes sense at this point. As Max said early, the attitude downgraded when the talent upgraded, which shouldn't necessarily happen.

Which is the final challenge for Stevens.  How does his nice guy approach work with players after they've got a few years in the league and a few million dollars in the bank?

We should probably not freak out quite so much over a 50 win team but it's legitimate to be very concerned at how the team's defense had degraded overall and completely imploded far too many time this season.  And let's be clear, this is not just an issue for KO or Jaylen or the bench.  Pretty much every starter except Smart has had way too many games this year when they played as if defense was optional.

Mike

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #217 on: April 06, 2017, 09:39:18 PM »

Offline 86MaxwellSmart

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3991
  • Tommy Points: 395
These Refs are totally cheating FOR the Hawks...obvious.
Larry Bird was Greater than you think.

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #218 on: April 06, 2017, 09:41:01 PM »

Online Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21232
  • Tommy Points: 2451
We got guys just watching.
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #219 on: April 06, 2017, 09:41:32 PM »

Offline 86MaxwellSmart

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3991
  • Tommy Points: 395
Hawks get like 2-3 shots EVERY time down the court---Danny you SUCK
Larry Bird was Greater than you think.

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #220 on: April 06, 2017, 09:41:33 PM »

Offline mr. dee

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8076
  • Tommy Points: 615
Still can't rebound with 3 players on traffic, smh..

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #221 on: April 06, 2017, 09:42:16 PM »

Offline 86MaxwellSmart

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3991
  • Tommy Points: 395
these Refs suck worse than us.
Larry Bird was Greater than you think.

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #222 on: April 06, 2017, 09:42:44 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
Still can't rebound with 3 players on traffic, smh..

It's sad.
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #223 on: April 06, 2017, 09:42:48 PM »

Offline celtics2030

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1437
  • Tommy Points: 72
we are going to have to up the pace to have a chance

Re: Celtics (50-28) at Hawks (39-38) Game #79 4/6/17
« Reply #224 on: April 06, 2017, 09:42:56 PM »

Offline Boston Garden Leprechaun

  • Sam Jones
  • **********************
  • Posts: 22095
  • Tommy Points: 1775
We got guys just watching.

does CBS ever chew anybody out?
LET'S GO CELTICS!