Author Topic: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder  (Read 5943 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #15 on: June 23, 2016, 10:37:23 AM »

Offline Granath

  • NCE
  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2154
  • Tommy Points: 567
The chances of the guy you draft at 16 in such a shallow draft becoming as good as even Thad Young are so laughably minuscule. People place way too much emphasis on draft picks at times.

"No way, I'm not passing on the chance to draft who would likely amount to a Solomon Hill or a Jeff Green in exchange for Thad Young."

Except this is known as a quite deep draft with likely multiple successful NBA players drafted into the 2nd round.
Jaylen Brown will be an All Star in the next 5 years.

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #16 on: June 23, 2016, 10:37:23 AM »

Offline Endless Paradise

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2867
  • Tommy Points: 182
i really dont know much about thad young, so i have a question. is he comparable/better than sully?

if so, he might serve as a nice replacement at the forward spot.

He's way better than Sully.

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #17 on: June 23, 2016, 10:37:56 AM »

Offline Endless Paradise

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2867
  • Tommy Points: 182
The chances of the guy you draft at 16 in such a shallow draft becoming as good as even Thad Young are so laughably minuscule. People place way too much emphasis on draft picks at times.

"No way, I'm not passing on the chance to draft who would likely amount to a Solomon Hill or a Jeff Green in exchange for Thad Young."

Except this is known as a quite deep draft with likely multiple successful NBA players drafted into the 2nd round.

Deep with role players, sure. If you're losing sleep over missing out on another James Young as though the Celtics aren't stocked with role players...

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #18 on: June 23, 2016, 10:38:00 AM »

Offline TheBig3

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 281
  • Tommy Points: 18
I bet Brad would love 16 for Thad

Bet Nets have Danny's phone number blocked on their phone systems

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #19 on: June 23, 2016, 10:40:19 AM »

Offline The Oracle

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1201
  • Tommy Points: 598
I would offer them 31 and 45

Don't think it gets done for that, they want to get into the 1st.
I'm pretty sure there was info out there that #22 + contract has already been offered, so that's your baseline.
#22 is Charlotte.  Maybe Hawes is all I can think of??

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #20 on: June 23, 2016, 10:41:08 AM »

Offline Snakehead

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6846
  • Tommy Points: 448
I would offer them 31 and 45

Don't think it gets done for that, they want to get into the 1st.
I'm pretty sure there was info out there that #22 + contract has already been offered, so that's your baseline.
#22 is Charlotte.  Maybe Hawes is all I can think of??

It's been reported Charlotte are trying to move 22 and a combo of either Lamb or Hawes.
"I really don't want people to understand me." - Jordan Crawford

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #21 on: June 23, 2016, 10:41:24 AM »

Offline BitterJim

  • NGT
  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9185
  • Tommy Points: 1238
Young is locked up for 3 more years at $12.5 million/year.  If all it costs us is #16, sign me up.  I might even throw in #23, too, if we could get McCullough
I'm bitter.

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #22 on: June 23, 2016, 10:43:12 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
The problem is matching salary.


Jerebko, Rozier and Hunter work in terms of salary, but does it make logical sense to trade them along with the 16th in terms of value?



Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #23 on: June 23, 2016, 10:44:46 AM »

Offline BitterJim

  • NGT
  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9185
  • Tommy Points: 1238
The problem is matching salary.


Jerebko, Rozier and Hunter work in terms of salary, but does it make logical sense to trade them along with the 16th in terms of value?

If you make the deal after the draft, it would be fine
I'm bitter.

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #24 on: June 23, 2016, 10:46:31 AM »

Offline furball

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 938
  • Tommy Points: 95
The problem is matching salary.


Jerebko, Rozier and Hunter work in terms of salary, but does it make logical sense to trade them along with the 16th in terms of value?

Could they agree to the trade, say 23 for Young (seeing as that would be better than 22 and a bad contract), have the Celtics pick the guy they want at 23 and then wait until July 1st, when the salary cap goes up, and make the trade then without having to add salary?

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #25 on: June 23, 2016, 10:50:06 AM »

Offline elcotte

  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 438
  • Tommy Points: 52
I bet Brad would love 16 for Thad

Bet Nets have Danny's phone number blocked on their phone systems

Bet they don't have it blocked as Danny has things they value.

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #26 on: June 23, 2016, 10:50:39 AM »

Offline The Oracle

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1201
  • Tommy Points: 598
Don't like the idea of them getting Lamb on a good contract +#22 at all.  Take that offer back Charlotte!

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #27 on: June 23, 2016, 10:53:25 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13641
  • Tommy Points: 1026
Thad Young has value.  Not so much necessarily directly to the Celtics immediately but potentially in another trade that may happen in the future.  Not sure that BKN would want to deal with us but assuming they would, and also assuming that Hawes + #22 or something like that is what we have to shoot for, I would do Amir + #16.

Again, not so much because I think Young is a great fit or a big difference maker for us in the short term but more because I think he has more value overall than Amir plus whoever we get at #16.  Young does bring scoring which is something we do need so he certainly is not a bad fit.  In the short term, he can help but beyond that, I feel he is a very trade-able piece for this big trade for a top player we are all hoping will be in our future.

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #28 on: June 23, 2016, 10:54:48 AM »

Offline The Oracle

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1201
  • Tommy Points: 598
The problem is matching salary.


Jerebko, Rozier and Hunter work in terms of salary, but does it make logical sense to trade them along with the 16th in terms of value?

Could they agree to the trade, say 23 for Young (seeing as that would be better than 22 and a bad contract), have the Celtics pick the guy they want at 23 and then wait until July 1st, when the salary cap goes up, and make the trade then without having to add salary?
Yes salary matching isn't a concern at all because the deals can be consummated after the cap goes up and most everyone has tons of space.

Re: Woj - Nets trying to move young for a 1st rounder
« Reply #29 on: June 23, 2016, 11:00:14 AM »

Offline coffee425

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 955
  • Tommy Points: 122
Has anyone thought about how the Nets replacing Thad Young with middle lottery rookies would make their team SIGNIFICANTLY WORSE??

I wonder what team would benefit from the Nets getting worse?

Giving the horse a carrot to help plow your farm ;)
Quote
Even at the end of the game, we lined up in different formation that he hadn't seen and he called out our play before I got the ball. I heard him calling it out. -John Wall on Brad Stevens