Would rather have Skal than Bender. Also Skal put up better stats in the NCAA than Bender did in the Israeli league. I think we could get him at 16 though, maybe. I would not take him this high.
Skal is 20, Bender is 18. That might not sound like much, but these are crucial developmental years for players, especially bigs.
Skal was probably the biggest disappointment in college basketball last year. Not sure how anyone can watch him play and think he will be a solid pro.
It was a disappointment bc people had going #2 or #3 at the draft. Like another poster mentioned he was a little misused. If he went to a different school and was the main guy, he would of done much better.
We are not talking about a guy who has all of these physical tools, but does not know how to rebound the ball, score, does not know how to play basketball (like a diallo). During the combine, individual interviews/workouts - he is going to impress
not stating this pick is not risky. Because we need to see solid productions/consistency, but I like the chances it does "click" and happen. He has wide shoulders and should be able to add weight
I like Murray and Brown too. But I feel Josh Hart is very nice alternative to Murray. Hart is older but is a slightly better athlete, longer wingspan, better ball handler and finisher around the basket.
Whatever the case is, none of murray, brown, bender, skal will make much impact for the Celts next season. Maybe Murray has the best chance. It's all a risk or so. Skal imo has the highest upside for a big player (rebound, block shots, Shoot the ball, explosiveness, does not shy away from contact, motor, IQ)