Author Topic: Kelly as a Center.  (Read 16174 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #60 on: August 18, 2015, 05:02:19 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Awrite, so I wrote a big post and it got deleted because I got logged out. That's lame.

So, LB, gotta disagree with your second point assessment about Olynyk -- I haven't had time to really dive into the numbers but on the face of it I think if it bears out that KO is playing better at the 5 than he is at the 4 (even if his ceiling is probably a bench level NBA player, which I believe we agree upon) it seems kind of silly to put him at the 4, although that's mostly arbitrary given our bigs.

The point that stats, particularly defensive stats, are lineup dependent is true, but I believe C18 (and he's gone on about this in other threads) is right when he points out that Olynyk's defensive deficiencies can be mostly masked if he's tasked with guarding the opposing five. That's not to say he'll turn into Omer Asik, but simply that he's less bad at guarding centers, at least guarding centers mitigates his worst qualities as a defender.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #61 on: August 18, 2015, 05:12:34 PM »

Offline tankcity!

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1903
  • Tommy Points: 129
Looking at the stats and various other assessments, there seems to be a line of argument that centre is KO's best position (mainly due to deficiencies as a forward), but he isn't a great centre. To be fair his attributes have been mentioned and he does a lot of good things. I think he could be a vital link in a CBS coached team, especially off the bench. Due to him not being a carbon copy of a 'typical' centre or like the other players we have that are likely to play centre, he changes things up when he comes on and creates a different threat.

He also has that ability to dislocate an all stars shoulder or elbow, which could be valuable.

There is little doubt that playing time will be shared around with this squad and I think KO will get enough to use his strengths but won't be over used so his weaknesses become a massive problem.

I agree with this. If all indications are that Olynyk is more effective as a center than a power forward, play him at center. It doesn't absolve the team of the fact that we lack a starting-caliber center, and I don't believe that we should pass on including Olynyk in a trade for one should the opportunity arise or refuse to curtail his minutes if one appears on the roster along side him.
Here's what I'm trying to say here...

I'm not sure that Kelly is an effective center.

I'm not sure that Kelly is most effective at center.

When you're looking at team-based stats, context can get lost.  Was Kelly most effective in lineups when he was playing center?  Who was playing power forward in those line-ups?   Alternatively, who was playing center next to Kelly when he was playing power forward?  As far as I can tell, this team was pretty devoid of true centers last year.  Zeller was the only player that could realistically be seen as a real center and Zeller at best is an overachieving 2nd/3rd string center.  If Kelly was playing power forward... who was he playing power forward next to?   If it was ineffective, you have to consider if perhaps it just wasn't a good mix of players next to him.

If Kelly + Zeller was less effective than Bass + Kelly or Sully + Kelly, couldn't that speak more to the fact that Sullinger and Bass are better at basketball than Zeller?   This team didn't have a lot of talent last year, but one position they had some quality at was power forward.  Sullinger, Bass and Olynyk are about as close to "starter-caliber" talent that this team had.   Maximizing the amount of basketball talent on the court at once necessitated having one of those guys play out of position at center.  Kelly, being 7 foot and reasonably resembling what we consider proper "center" size in this league was the one to get the nod. 

This reminds me of a small-level version of Jeff Green + Kevin Durant.  Those early Thunder/Sonic teams lacked overall talent.  It was clear that Jeff Green was one of their 3 best players.   Obviously, Durant was the best SF they had.  If they were going to play Green, it was going to be out of position... Green got stuck playing PF.   Now, if you were to look at some 82games breakdowns of those early Sonic/Thunder teams, you might come to the conclusion that Jeff Green was far more "effective" in lineups where he played PF vs lineups when he played SF.   Context:   Durant (SF) + Green (PF) was probably more effective than Green (SF) + Chris Wilcox (PF) ...  Does that mean that Green was more "effective" at PF than SF?   Or does that just reflect the fact that Kevin Durant was so significantly better than Chris Wilcox that it outweighed the fact that Jeff Green was playing out of position?

Green was a SF playing out of position at PF by necessity.   Kelly is a PF who played out of position at C by necessity.    Kelly isn't a center.  And let's not gloss over the fact that he was such a poor solution at center that he lost the starting role to Tyler Zeller.    I still believe Kelly has game, though.  I really like Kelly for his offensive ability.   I'd be rather curious to see how he played at PF next to an appropriately talented center whose abilities compliment Kelly's strengths (offense) and weaknesses (interior defense).     As others have mentioned, it will be interesting to see him in a line-up with Amir Johnson.

TL;DR:  At gunpoint, I'd guesstimate the rankings of our bigs last year as Bass > Sully > Oly > Zeller.   It shouldn't be stunning that lineups featuring the two worst bigs was the least effective.

Okay, so let me get this clear. Because KO can't play defense, he shouldn't play center. So when the Suns had Channing Frye at C and were successful, that was dumb too? You do know the center will have to guard KO at the 3 point line right? Right now, KO is still developing, but I think he can get to Frye's level.

Also, you're basically saying that KO should be playing PF, a position where the league has changed. If you're going to play 4, then you need to be atheltic and quick. He can't guard those players either so I don't even get your point. I don't need stats to back it up because I'm just using my brain.

The dude is a Center and the Celtics will have to deal with his bad defense. Stevens will need to get creative and cover for it somehow.

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #62 on: August 18, 2015, 06:25:23 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182


On paper Amir would appear to be Olynyk's best companion in the frontcourt.

On paper I agree, but how effective is Amir at defending the perimeter, really?
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #63 on: August 18, 2015, 06:26:50 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469


On paper Amir would appear to be Olynyk's best companion in the frontcourt.

On paper I agree, but how effective is Amir at defending the perimeter, really?

Looking forward to finding out. 

My guess is that he's better than any other big we've had recently (although, Brandon wasn't actually too bad--a quality of his that's often overlooked). 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #64 on: August 18, 2015, 06:27:47 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182


On paper Amir would appear to be Olynyk's best companion in the frontcourt.

On paper I agree, but how effective is Amir at defending the perimeter, really?

Looking forward to finding out.  My guess is that he's better than any other big we've had recently (although, Brandon wasn't actually too bad--a quality of his that's often overlooked).

I was actually thinking of Jerebko as maybe our most capable big of defending both forward spots.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #65 on: August 18, 2015, 06:32:04 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469


On paper Amir would appear to be Olynyk's best companion in the frontcourt.

On paper I agree, but how effective is Amir at defending the perimeter, really?

Looking forward to finding out.  My guess is that he's better than any other big we've had recently (although, Brandon wasn't actually too bad--a quality of his that's often overlooked).

I was actually thinking of Jerebko as maybe our most capable big of defending both forward spots.

I agree. But I wouldn't count Jonas as a big. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #66 on: August 18, 2015, 06:42:36 PM »

Offline tankcity!

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1903
  • Tommy Points: 129
Looking at the stats and various other assessments, there seems to be a line of argument that centre is KO's best position (mainly due to deficiencies as a forward), but he isn't a great centre. To be fair his attributes have been mentioned and he does a lot of good things. I think he could be a vital link in a CBS coached team, especially off the bench. Due to him not being a carbon copy of a 'typical' centre or like the other players we have that are likely to play centre, he changes things up when he comes on and creates a different threat.

He also has that ability to dislocate an all stars shoulder or elbow, which could be valuable.

There is little doubt that playing time will be shared around with this squad and I think KO will get enough to use his strengths but won't be over used so his weaknesses become a massive problem.

I agree with this. If all indications are that Olynyk is more effective as a center than a power forward, play him at center. It doesn't absolve the team of the fact that we lack a starting-caliber center, and I don't believe that we should pass on including Olynyk in a trade for one should the opportunity arise or refuse to curtail his minutes if one appears on the roster along side him.
Here's what I'm trying to say here...

I'm not sure that Kelly is an effective center.

I'm not sure that Kelly is most effective at center.

When you're looking at team-based stats, context can get lost.  Was Kelly most effective in lineups when he was playing center?  Who was playing power forward in those line-ups?   Alternatively, who was playing center next to Kelly when he was playing power forward?  As far as I can tell, this team was pretty devoid of true centers last year.  Zeller was the only player that could realistically be seen as a real center and Zeller at best is an overachieving 2nd/3rd string center.  If Kelly was playing power forward... who was he playing power forward next to?   If it was ineffective, you have to consider if perhaps it just wasn't a good mix of players next to him.

If Kelly + Zeller was less effective than Bass + Kelly or Sully + Kelly, couldn't that speak more to the fact that Sullinger and Bass are better at basketball than Zeller?   This team didn't have a lot of talent last year, but one position they had some quality at was power forward.  Sullinger, Bass and Olynyk are about as close to "starter-caliber" talent that this team had.   Maximizing the amount of basketball talent on the court at once necessitated having one of those guys play out of position at center.  Kelly, being 7 foot and reasonably resembling what we consider proper "center" size in this league was the one to get the nod. 

This reminds me of a small-level version of Jeff Green + Kevin Durant.  Those early Thunder/Sonic teams lacked overall talent.  It was clear that Jeff Green was one of their 3 best players.   Obviously, Durant was the best SF they had.  If they were going to play Green, it was going to be out of position... Green got stuck playing PF.   Now, if you were to look at some 82games breakdowns of those early Sonic/Thunder teams, you might come to the conclusion that Jeff Green was far more "effective" in lineups where he played PF vs lineups when he played SF.   Context:   Durant (SF) + Green (PF) was probably more effective than Green (SF) + Chris Wilcox (PF) ...  Does that mean that Green was more "effective" at PF than SF?   Or does that just reflect the fact that Kevin Durant was so significantly better than Chris Wilcox that it outweighed the fact that Jeff Green was playing out of position?

Green was a SF playing out of position at PF by necessity.   Kelly is a PF who played out of position at C by necessity.    Kelly isn't a center.  And let's not gloss over the fact that he was such a poor solution at center that he lost the starting role to Tyler Zeller.    I still believe Kelly has game, though.  I really like Kelly for his offensive ability.   I'd be rather curious to see how he played at PF next to an appropriately talented center whose abilities compliment Kelly's strengths (offense) and weaknesses (interior defense).     As others have mentioned, it will be interesting to see him in a line-up with Amir Johnson.

TL;DR:  At gunpoint, I'd guesstimate the rankings of our bigs last year as Bass > Sully > Oly > Zeller.   It shouldn't be stunning that lineups featuring the two worst bigs was the least effective.

Okay, so let me get this clear. Because KO can't play defense, he shouldn't play center. So when the Suns had Channing Frye at C and were successful, that was dumb too? You do know the center will have to guard KO at the 3 point line right? Right now, KO is still developing, but I think he can get to Frye's level.

Also, you're basically saying that KO should be playing PF, a position where the league has changed. If you're going to play 4, then you need to be atheltic and quick. He can't guard those players either so I don't even get your point. I don't need stats to back it up because I'm just using my brain.

The dude is a Center and the Celtics will have to deal with his bad defense. Stevens will need to get creative and cover for it somehow.

Where you hiding birddy? Come out and play.

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #67 on: August 18, 2015, 06:42:45 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182


On paper Amir would appear to be Olynyk's best companion in the frontcourt.

On paper I agree, but how effective is Amir at defending the perimeter, really?

Looking forward to finding out.  My guess is that he's better than any other big we've had recently (although, Brandon wasn't actually too bad--a quality of his that's often overlooked).

I was actually thinking of Jerebko as maybe our most capable big of defending both forward spots.

I agree. But I wouldn't count Jonas as a big.

You're right, he's a "swing"


(I'm glad Brad has the savvy not to refer to such players as "swingers")
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #68 on: August 18, 2015, 07:04:11 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469


On paper Amir would appear to be Olynyk's best companion in the frontcourt.

On paper I agree, but how effective is Amir at defending the perimeter, really?

Looking forward to finding out.  My guess is that he's better than any other big we've had recently (although, Brandon wasn't actually too bad--a quality of his that's often overlooked).

I was actually thinking of Jerebko as maybe our most capable big of defending both forward spots.

I agree. But I wouldn't count Jonas as a big.

You're right, he's a "swing"


(I'm glad Brad has the savvy not to refer to such players as "swingers")

C'mon, you know Jae and Jonas are swingers. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #69 on: August 18, 2015, 07:13:55 PM »

Offline mctyson

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5087
  • Tommy Points: 372
I'll go on record saying that I like KO at center.  He is big, he can take any 5 off the dribble, can stretch out the defense, and has really long hair.

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #70 on: August 18, 2015, 09:02:47 PM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13800
  • Tommy Points: 1034
To me it is easy.  Olynyk is going to be a nice backup center. His versatility will help any second unit and his defense will not be exposed as much by the opposing center.

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #71 on: August 18, 2015, 09:16:45 PM »

Offline CelticsFanFromNYC

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 765
  • Tommy Points: 137
Random thought but I feel Kelly will always be a great back up PF/C as long as he plays in tier 2-3 teams (Assuming were dividing the league in 3 tiers. Unless he gets shooting and driving happy I see him having a future as a great asset for teams getting ready to hit contention, then he will help the next team. I HOPE NOT!! he just gives me that feeling though, hopefully he proves me wrong.

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #72 on: August 18, 2015, 10:25:03 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
Awrite, so I wrote a big post and it got deleted because I got logged out. That's lame.

So, LB, gotta disagree with your second point assessment about Olynyk -- I haven't had time to really dive into the numbers but on the face of it I think if it bears out that KO is playing better at the 5 than he is at the 4 (even if his ceiling is probably a bench level NBA player, which I believe we agree upon) it seems kind of silly to put him at the 4, although that's mostly arbitrary given our bigs.

The point that stats, particularly defensive stats, are lineup dependent is true, but I believe C18 (and he's gone on about this in other threads) is right when he points out that Olynyk's defensive deficiencies can be mostly masked if he's tasked with guarding the opposing five. That's not to say he'll turn into Omer Asik, but simply that he's less bad at guarding centers, at least guarding centers mitigates his worst qualities as a defender.

I tend to agree.

I've watched Kelly play defense in the post, and he's actually not that bad.  Sure he's not a shot-blocker, but he actually plays quite physical and positions himself well - he's also very adept at taking charges.  He lacks the outright length and strength to dominant on the defensive end, but from I've seen he tends to make up for that somewhat with smart positioning and strong effort.

Finally his lateral quickness (a bit of a weakness at PF) becomes a strength once he moves to the center spot - he's quicker on his feet than a lot of NBA centers.

Where his real advantage comes in though, is on offence.

When KO plays the center spot, he creates a LOT of matchup problems because the opposing center has to step out to defend his perimeter shot, and yet very few centers can stick with KO if he puts it on the floor and drives to the basket. 

I lost count of the number of times last year where he caught the ball on the perimeter, and the opposing big was forced to run out to contest.  KO then used a baby pump fake, put the ball on the floor, and drove straight past the defender like he was standing still.  With his decent mobility and very good ball handling skills, most opposing centers just can't change directions and stick with him off the dribble. 

Once KO does get in to the paint, he's a muti-dimensional threat.  He's a very good finisher around the basket (68% FG inside 3 feet last year), has the IQ / court vision to make the right pass of the defense contests, and he has the ability to pull up for a jumper/floater if the defense clogs the paint.

If the opposing big decides to avoid this scenario by no running out to contest him on the perimeter, then KO can (and will) knock down open threes all night long.

I feel like putting him at the PF negates a lot of that advantage in todays NBA, where many teams now go small and play quick hybrid-forwards (like Thaddeus Young, Rudy G@y, Paul Millsap and Jeff Green) at the PF spot.   Guys like that are quick enough to run out and contest Olynyk on the perimeter, and tp react and stick with him if he puts it on the floor.  Yet Olynyk's lack of physical dominance (length and muscle) means he doesn't have the ability to punish the defense for putting a smaller and more agile PF on him. 

Also many of today's PFs are perimeter oriented anyway, so having Olynyk draw them out on offense doesn't necessarily hurt a team too much, since they can still have their center stay inside and take care of the interior.  Putting him at center forces the big man to step out, which leaves the team (potentially) without a rebounding in the middle.

I actually think this is probably a big reason why the Sully / Olynyk duo has been so statistical strong in the past.  If Olynyk forces the center out to the perimeter, then Sully is going to be able to dominate the paint and out-rebound most opposing Power Forwards.  Likewise on defense Sully can create just as many mismatches with his ability to overpower smaller fours in the paint.

While Sully and Olynyk aren't great defensive players, they aren't TERRIBLE ones either (at least statistically) so if they probably cause more trouble on offense than they are given on defense in most cases.  They obviously lack rim protection, but that's less of an issue for us given that any perimeter players trying to get to the rim first need to get past some combination of Smart/Bradley/Rozier/Crowder/Jerebko

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #73 on: August 18, 2015, 11:22:47 PM »

Offline CelticsFanFromNYC

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 765
  • Tommy Points: 137
What im starting to think the problem with KO is based on his skillset,(ball handling, stretching floor) A lot of his strengths aren't going to be able to be utilized much being the 3rd to 4th option on possessions (at times which is agreeable). His weaknesses are far more needed on this team then his strengths. Kinda like the the guy the coach goes " Heck of a player, I really liked him but..."  I personally think he's one of a kind. He either gets hungry and plays like he;s the best player on the floor or goes packing

Re: Kelly as a Center.
« Reply #74 on: August 18, 2015, 11:30:01 PM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
I'll go on record saying that I like KO at center.  He is big, he can take any 5 off the dribble, can stretch out the defense, and has really long hair.
Finally  ;D