^ Lazy. It's very possible for a draft to be loaded (particularly when talking about selection) and still be disappointing. Particularly a draft like 2014, which was decimated by injuries.
Except that's not what he was referring to. LarBrd33 expected Smart to come out and put up 15-5-5 in his rookie year. No wonder it was disappointing to him given that little gem.
I wasn't the only one who was disappointed by Smart's rookie season. I've already pointed out that if you go back to the thread about Smart prior to last season, there were several people who thought he'd put up numbers similar to Tyreke Evans... and when someone name-dropped Iman SHumpert, people explicitly said they'd be disappointed if Smart put up Shumpert-esque numbers. Turns out, that'e exactly what he did. I figured on a lotto team like ours, he'd have no trouble putting up 15, 5 and 5. Solid poor man's Tyreke Evans. He was labelled an NBA-ready player. HIs offensive game was nowhere near what I expected. I hope his progress in summer league carries over into the regular season, but I'm thinking it's the other way around... his progress in the regular season has carried over into the summer league. Whether or not he's developed beyond the player who averaged 9.1 points, 2.6 assists, 3.8 rebounds, 1.9 steals during the second half of the season... that's what I'm curious about. Perhaps his stats would have been higher if Boston played a different style. Evan Turner was basically playing point-forward. So perhaps those 12.6 points, 5.5 assists, 3.4 rebound, 1.9 steal projections for next season will come true if Smart is the primary ball-handler next year. I still doubt Smart develops into an all-star. A superstar seems highly unlikely.
But what do I know? I"m already eating crow over the Embiid thing. I don't mind eating more.
Your Wrong,
Smart Will be an All-Star for years to come. He can already get to the line and score at will now.
... against summer league talent... in which he shot 30% in half his games...
Sorry, but you're missing my point. Second year players are usually the ones who dominate summer league action. It's to be expected considering they have just spent a year playing against NBA talent.
Let me explain it in terms that some of my fellow couch potatoes can understand. Imagine you're playing an online video game that has a match-making feature that pairs you up with players of your level. A game like Mario Kart or something... You start playing against level 1 players... you're alright, but not great. Eventually the more you play, the more you level up... level 2... you're alright... level 3, you're alright... eventually you're all the way up to level 10 and playing against other level 10 players. You're not great, but you're holding your own... you spend a whole year playing against level 10 players, but you're still finishing middle of the pack in your Mario Kart race. Then after a year, you decide to create a brand new account and play against some level 1 players. What do you expect will happen?
Does that make sense? I can't lose my mind over Smart dominating against level 1 talent. I still don't know if he's going to ever be anything more than middle of the pack against level 10 talent. The assumption in this thread is that because Smart is now dominating against level 1 talent (which I'm not disputing), it means he obviously progressed wildly since we last saw him struggling against level 10 talent... and it means that as soon as he jumps back into his original Mario Kart account in November, he'll be an unstoppable legend against his fellow level 10 players. I'm not sure that assumption is accurate.