Poll

Do we win 47 games

Yes they will
No they will not
I Love Leprechauns

Author Topic: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins  (Read 45555 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #60 on: July 02, 2015, 09:34:37 AM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #61 on: July 02, 2015, 09:45:56 AM »

Offline apc

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4310
  • Tommy Points: 437

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.


IMO Crowder is more valueble than Jerebko. I think the cost is fair.

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #62 on: July 02, 2015, 09:54:22 AM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means. 

DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #63 on: July 02, 2015, 10:13:06 AM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

Don't you see it?
You cannot understand what improvement means because you are, uh, delusional.
Sorry mate, but someone had to break the bad news.

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #64 on: July 02, 2015, 10:14:39 AM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

Don't you see it?
You cannot understand what improvement means because you are, uh, delusional.
Sorry mate, but someone had to break the bad news.

I think you are being sarcastic. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #65 on: July 02, 2015, 10:14:39 AM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

Love the Princess Bride quote hehe.

41 is possible I don't see it but possible, but 47? That is crazy talk!!

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #66 on: July 02, 2015, 10:15:35 AM »

Offline manl_lui

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6571
  • Tommy Points: 427
I think we'll be around the same amount of wins. lesser talent compare to other teams but I trust in Brad Stevens and he'll get them to work hard

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #67 on: July 02, 2015, 10:16:13 AM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

Love the Princess Bride quote hehe.

41 is possible I don't see it but possible, but 47? That is crazy talk!!

It's a stretch, I agree, but it's certainly not at the level of crazy. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #68 on: July 02, 2015, 10:17:58 AM »

Offline Future Celtics Owner

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3097
  • Tommy Points: 191
  • Celtic's only raise championship Banners
I hope its under 23 games

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #69 on: July 02, 2015, 10:22:24 AM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
I hope its under 23 games

Now, that's bordering on delusional. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #70 on: July 02, 2015, 10:22:24 AM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

Love the Princess Bride quote hehe.

41 is possible I don't see it but possible, but 47? That is crazy talk!!

It's a stretch, I agree, but it's certainly not at the level of crazy.

Where I come from that's crazy. A team full of bench players winning close to 50 games, I mean if you say they can win 47 than they are basically a 50 win team. If anyone can sit here with a straight face and talk themselves into the idea that this is a 50 win team, CRAZY!!!!!

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #71 on: July 02, 2015, 10:23:01 AM »

Offline greece66

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7395
  • Tommy Points: 1342
  • Head Paperboy at Greenville
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

Don't you see it?
You cannot understand what improvement means because you are, uh, delusional.
Sorry mate, but someone had to break the bad news.

I think you are being sarcastic.
I think I am.
But then again, I'm delusional too, so I might be wrong.

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #72 on: July 02, 2015, 10:24:56 AM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

Love the Princess Bride quote hehe.

41 is possible I don't see it but possible, but 47? That is crazy talk!!

It's a stretch, I agree, but it's certainly not at the level of crazy.

Where I come from that's crazy. A team full of bench players winning close to 50 games, I mean if you say they can win 47 than they are basically a 50 win team. If anyone can sit here with a straight face and talk themselves into the idea that this is a 50 win team, CRAZY!!!!!

It's not a team full of bench players.  I predict at least five players on the Celtics roster next year will be starters. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #73 on: July 02, 2015, 10:27:31 AM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
Anyone that thinks we are going to be better as of right now is totally delusional!!

We are bringing back the same roster just paying them more, adding Amir a bench player and drastically over paying for him will not make us any better what so ever.

I like Jerebko and $5m seems ok for him.
I like Crowder but $7m for him seems like an over pay.
Amir for $12m is insane.

Overpaying bench players is not going to give us more wins. Thinking we are going to duplicate the run that we had at the end of last season is unrealistic, most the teams we played sucked and some of them will get better.

Like to add that the reality of IT will kick in, people will see he's a ball hog that wants to play hero ball. Instead of him being applauded by all-star break people here will want him shipped out ASAP.

With our current team unless the players get a lot better this is a 37 win team next year, looking at the 10-12 pick, as many say here - NBA Purgatory.

If I think next year's Celtics will win 41 games, I'm delusional?  You have them at 4 wins less than that for a total of 37.  You even seem to suggest in your last paragraph that improvement is at least a possibility.

I'm not sure that word means what you think it means.

Love the Princess Bride quote hehe.

41 is possible I don't see it but possible, but 47? That is crazy talk!!

It's a stretch, I agree, but it's certainly not at the level of crazy.

Where I come from that's crazy. A team full of bench players winning close to 50 games, I mean if you say they can win 47 than they are basically a 50 win team. If anyone can sit here with a straight face and talk themselves into the idea that this is a 50 win team, CRAZY!!!!!

It's not a team full of bench players.  I predict at least five players on the Celtics roster next year will be starters.

Hehehehe it wont be the same 5 all year though.

Re: Poll: Over Under 47 Wins
« Reply #74 on: July 02, 2015, 10:30:08 AM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
I think there are more or less two basic camps:

1. People who thought the success the Celts enjoyed in the last 2-3 months of this past season was due to the Celts actually being good.  Greater than the sum of their parts.

2. People who thought that success was due to the Celts simply trying harder / out-hustling other teams, the Celts having a rotation opponents had never played against before, opponents "playing down / through" the Celtics, or what have you.


There are reasons to think either side could be right.  Obviously I'm in group #2.  I would not call somebody in group #1 delusional.  Just optimistic.  Perhaps obstinately so, depending on how much I think they know about the game and the history of the league.  But I can't criticize somebody for being obstinately optimistic, unless he or she is a jerk to those who choose not to be.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain