0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
@BitterJim: OKC is sending out Lance Thomas. The second is from the Cavs.
Quote from: Endless Paradise on January 05, 2015, 08:21:44 PM@BitterJim: OKC is sending out Lance Thomas. The second is from the Cavs.Well that makes more sense, thanksAt least they're not getting Waiters for absolutely nothing
So, the question we'll be hearing on CelticsBlog a lot over the next few days: should Danny have taken Waiters if all it cost was a trade exception?
Quote from: Roy H. on January 05, 2015, 08:23:06 PMSo, the question we'll be hearing on CelticsBlog a lot over the next few days: should Danny have taken Waiters if all it cost was a trade exception?No.
Quote from: BitterJim on January 05, 2015, 08:24:10 PMQuote from: Endless Paradise on January 05, 2015, 08:21:44 PM@BitterJim: OKC is sending out Lance Thomas. The second is from the Cavs.Well that makes more sense, thanksAt least they're not getting Waiters for absolutely nothingIs Lance Thomas more or less than nothing?
Lance Thomas is getting waived by the Knicks and wasn't in the Thunder's rotation. OKC literally acquired Waiters for nothing.
Quote from: Endless Paradise on January 05, 2015, 08:29:53 PMLance Thomas is getting waived by the Knicks and wasn't in the Thunder's rotation. OKC literally acquired Waiters for nothing.amazing how the modern NBA CBA works, we get a crap sandwich for Rondo yet OKC gets Waiters for nothing
so we could have had waiters for nothing, is danny asleep or something