Author Topic: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14  (Read 79388 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #150 on: December 27, 2014, 08:13:20 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
Not to take away from how awesomely bad the players are tonight, but you can't go 12 deep in the first half.  That's just flailing.

Mike

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #151 on: December 27, 2014, 08:13:48 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

So overpaying Rondo or letting him walking him for nothing was a much better option?
I have said that again and again and again.

Please explain one more time
If he's as bad as people say you won't have to pay that much. If he's good he's probably worth it and his worth is more than just his stats. If he leaves you take the money off the cap. But you don't let people like players and other GMs stare you down and make you take crud for a great player and make you their ****.
Show the league you try to pay your players that do well. Make him walk away from a fair deal. If someone overpays him that's their problem.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #152 on: December 27, 2014, 08:13:50 PM »

Offline Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52803
  • Tommy Points: 2568
I thought with Rondo gone, the ball movement was going to be incredible. Tonight, it seems every play is a one-on-one move by a Celtics player. Where's the ball movement? And again, it's Community Auditions with all the guys being shuffled in and out.
Nobody can draw a double team. Too few guys can drive past their man and force defense collapse.

Result = lot of plays against a set defense resulting in contested shots.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #153 on: December 27, 2014, 08:13:54 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Celts won't win, but they will make it very close.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #154 on: December 27, 2014, 08:15:01 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

You do not seem to know what the word "respectable" means.

Mike
I think the Wizards know the difference right about now

You do realize that the last time we played the Wizards Rondo had 0 pts, 2 reb, 4 ast, 3 tov's, was a -15, in 21 minutes, and we were down 23 before Stevens benched him the rest of the game and we rallied back, right? Just saying...

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #155 on: December 27, 2014, 08:15:11 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
I got my money on 10-21 soon.


Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #156 on: December 27, 2014, 08:15:59 PM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
If Marcus Smart is hurt at all he shouldn't be playing. He has looked slow and old tonight. Again, I know he is a rookie, but all I have heard is that he is NBA-ready. Doesn't look it.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #157 on: December 27, 2014, 08:16:13 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Who comes off the bench first in the second half?

Bass or Wright?
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #158 on: December 27, 2014, 08:16:34 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

You do not seem to know what the word "respectable" means.

Mike
I think the Wizards know the difference right about now

Did Rondo leave town owing you money or something?  This was a bad team when he was here and he played like absolute garbage at times.  What exactly is your grievance?

Mike

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #159 on: December 27, 2014, 08:17:31 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

You do not seem to know what the word "respectable" means.

Mike
I think the Wizards know the difference right about now

You do realize that the last time we played the Wizards Rondo had 0 pts, 2 reb, 4 ast, 3 tov's, was a -15, in 21 minutes, and we were down 23 before Stevens benched him the rest of the game and we rallied back, right? Just saying...
2nd unit got hot and there was no need to bring back some starters. Young guys got a chance and old guys got a rest. Whoop de doo. Those rally guys are all out there right now. Think it's against the laws of physics for Rondo to get in there and lead a rally?

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #160 on: December 27, 2014, 08:17:36 PM »

Offline KeepRondo

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • Tommy Points: 215
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

So overpaying Rondo or letting him walking him for nothing was a much better option?
I have said that again and again and again.

Please explain one more time
If he's as bad as people say you won't have to pay that much. If he's good he's probably worth it and his worth is more than just his stats. If he leaves you take the money off the cap. But you don't let people like players and other GMs stare you down and make you take crud for a great player and make you their ****.
Show the league you try to pay your players that do well. Make him walk away from a fair deal. If someone overpays him that's their problem.
This does make sense. It's gonna make it hard on Ainge to get fair value if he needs to unload another player. GMs know we will settle for scraps.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #161 on: December 27, 2014, 08:17:54 PM »

Offline Nerf DPOY

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2509
  • Tommy Points: 377
I got my money on 10-21 soon.

I'll be at that Hornets game on Jan 5 when they are, so I'm hoping for a W that night.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #162 on: December 27, 2014, 08:18:20 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

You do not seem to know what the word "respectable" means.

Mike
I think the Wizards know the difference right about now

Did Rondo leave town owing you money or something?  This was a bad team when he was here and he played like absolute garbage at times.  What exactly is your grievance?

Mike
Horrible deal that Danny should never have even considered.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #163 on: December 27, 2014, 08:18:20 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Brad Stevens = Mr. Rogers
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #164 on: December 27, 2014, 08:18:20 PM »

Offline tazzmaniac

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8991
  • Tommy Points: 583
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

So overpaying Rondo or letting him walking him for nothing was a much better option?
I have said that again and again and again.

Please explain one more time
If he's as bad as people say you won't have to pay that much. If he's good he's probably worth it and his worth is more than just his stats. If he leaves you take the money off the cap. But you don't let people like players and other GMs stare you down and make you take crud for a great player and make you their ****.
Show the league you try to pay your players that do well. Make him walk away from a fair deal. If someone overpays him that's their problem.

Also most of the teams that want Rondo are over the cap.  So if necessary you'd probably get the same or better value in a sign and trade.