Author Topic: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14  (Read 79088 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #210 on: December 27, 2014, 08:31:57 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
the C's endlessly try to make Bradley a 2 guard who can shoot......he just cannot shoot with any consistency...

It's the first thing I would upgrade.
to think they paid him 10 mill, but would not pay tony allen...instead they paid marquis "pass me the spleef" Danials...
Cool story, bro. But we're not paying him $10 million.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #211 on: December 27, 2014, 08:32:07 PM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Is Stevens tankinking or just a bad NBA coach?
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #212 on: December 27, 2014, 08:32:37 PM »

Offline MSceltic

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 239
  • Tommy Points: 23
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

So overpaying Rondo or letting him walking him for nothing was a much better option?
I have said that again and again and again.

Please explain one more time
If he's as bad as people say you won't have to pay that much. If he's good he's probably worth it and his worth is more than just his stats. If he leaves you take the money off the cap. But you don't let people like players and other GMs stare you down and make you take crud for a great player and make you their ****.
Show the league you try to pay your players that do well. Make him walk away from a fair deal. If someone overpays him that's their problem.
I certainly agree that he is not as bad as others are saying he was. The reason you had to trade him is because of how weak the eastern conference is. With him we were going to back into the playoffs as the 7 or 8 seed completely derailing the rebuilding plan. He is not worth the max on a rebuilding team and as Perk told us Rondo wanted out. Maybe you think Danny looked like a B*tch but i think he got more assets in a bare market. The fact is we were going to lose him for nothing and I think you cant let that happen in this league
Perk said he wanted out. But that's not what Rondo was saying or his agent. Doc said he didn't know what he wanted. Make him walk away from a fair deal. The Celts had the leverage (mostly in the form of holding his bird rights). Use it.

We can agree to disagree, I'm not sold on the importance of Bird rights to a guy like rondo. Also think you cant trust rondo and his agent. I think they were just being civil and professional. Boston had treated them well and they weren't going to publicly demand a trade because of the rumors of him being a punk the media talked about all the time.
I was/am optimistic for a couple reasons, one being that historically Rondo wasn't a greedy-take-every-dime kinda guy at all, but I can see and agree there were also some reasons to be pessimistic.

I agree he isn't a take every dime guy, which diminishes the value of his bird rights and makes potential suitors even more viable options

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #213 on: December 27, 2014, 08:32:59 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
you gotta love KO's heart..he launches that three, then is back in our end before it even hits the rim...LAZY PLAYER...oh you are SEVEN feet..?

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #214 on: December 27, 2014, 08:33:08 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

So overpaying Rondo or letting him walking him for nothing was a much better option?
I have said that again and again and again.

Please explain one more time
If he's as bad as people say you won't have to pay that much. If he's good he's probably worth it and his worth is more than just his stats. If he leaves you take the money off the cap. But you don't let people like players and other GMs stare you down and make you take crud for a great player and make you their ****.
Show the league you try to pay your players that do well. Make him walk away from a fair deal. If someone overpays him that's their problem.

So, you think Ainge lost a penis-measuring contest and you are vicariously enraged at that?

I can't really make any other sense of this argument.

1.  Rondo sucks, so we won't have to pay him a lot.
2.  Except Rondo really doesn't suck, so we should absolutely try to keep Rondo.
3.  But if Rondo doesn't want to take our lowball offer, we should let him walk for nothing because...that will somehow make Boston the cool, tough kid in class that all boys want to be like and all the girls want to be with?

Mike
You are starting to get it. You're maybe half way there.

Get what?  That you have a man-crush on Rondo?  We all get that.

Mike

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #215 on: December 27, 2014, 08:33:17 PM »

Offline rondohondo

  • NCE
  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10764
  • Tommy Points: 1196
Is Stevens tankinking or just a bad NBA coach?

it's a 3 pt contest, with no 3 point shooters ha

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #216 on: December 27, 2014, 08:33:22 PM »

Offline Shamrocker

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 786
  • Tommy Points: 69
Is there some sort of a competition for how deep a three we can get before Stevens calls a play?

True. But If he called a play, would this band of buffoons actually execute? 

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #217 on: December 27, 2014, 08:33:44 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
Is Stevens tankinking or just a bad NBA coach?

Well..LOL...he better get BETTER at ONE OR THE OTHER..!!!

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #218 on: December 27, 2014, 08:34:11 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52801
  • Tommy Points: 2568
Is Stevens tankinking or just a bad NBA coach?
Clearly not a guy you can trust with a long bench.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #219 on: December 27, 2014, 08:34:40 PM »

Offline Vox_Populi

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4468
  • Tommy Points: 346
Trying to find a silver lining.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #220 on: December 27, 2014, 08:34:55 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
I think if you love text-book basketball, you love zeller.....

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #221 on: December 27, 2014, 08:35:15 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Pressey is awful.
But does he have a good free throw percentage? How about fg%?

Rondo by now would've made such a difference. Surely he would have 3 rebounds by now and we'd be down less than 20.
Is that what happened a couple weeks ago when they beat the Wiz? Is that how it worked?

Are you referring to the game he shot 5-17 or the one he was benched in?
OMG! That's bad shooting? Wait. Did they win? I think I'm referencing the one they won and the one they lost in double overtime on the road.  Rather amazing we managed to do that without BOTH Brandon Wright AND Jae Crowder!

I know, you're absolutely right. Rondo was single-handedly carrying us. We had such a great record with him and have completely fallen apart with him.
Now you get it. Team was respectable with hope for the future. Now it's laughable with prayers Danny Ainge pulls off a miracle with a TPE or something.

So overpaying Rondo or letting him walking him for nothing was a much better option?
I have said that again and again and again.

Please explain one more time
If he's as bad as people say you won't have to pay that much. If he's good he's probably worth it and his worth is more than just his stats. If he leaves you take the money off the cap. But you don't let people like players and other GMs stare you down and make you take crud for a great player and make you their ****.
Show the league you try to pay your players that do well. Make him walk away from a fair deal. If someone overpays him that's their problem.
I certainly agree that he is not as bad as others are saying he was. The reason you had to trade him is because of how weak the eastern conference is. With him we were going to back into the playoffs as the 7 or 8 seed completely derailing the rebuilding plan. He is not worth the max on a rebuilding team and as Perk told us Rondo wanted out. Maybe you think Danny looked like a B*tch but i think he got more assets in a bare market. The fact is we were going to lose him for nothing and I think you cant let that happen in this league
Perk said he wanted out. But that's not what Rondo was saying or his agent. Doc said he didn't know what he wanted. Make him walk away from a fair deal. The Celts had the leverage (mostly in the form of holding his bird rights). Use it.

We can agree to disagree, I'm not sold on the importance of Bird rights to a guy like rondo. Also think you cant trust rondo and his agent. I think they were just being civil and professional. Boston had treated them well and they weren't going to publicly demand a trade because of the rumors of him being a punk the media talked about all the time.
I was/am optimistic for a couple reasons, one being that historically Rondo wasn't a greedy-take-every-dime kinda guy at all, but I can see and agree there were also some reasons to be pessimistic.

I agree he isn't a take every dime guy, which diminishes the value of his bird rights and makes potential suitors even more viable options
I still think he wants the dimes. I mean I suppose he could have gone to NY or LAL. At some point you gotta compete for a guy's services.

This happens to the Patriots all the time. Routinely. They have guys coming up in free agency and they don't freak out about it. They make an offer. Or don't. It's no big deal. And everyone calls them geniuses. Have an idea of what a guy is worth. Make that offer. Don't play games. Very simple. Black and white. Easy

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #222 on: December 27, 2014, 08:35:21 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 52801
  • Tommy Points: 2568
Please put Bradley on Wall.

Wall is killing Jameer Nelson.

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #223 on: December 27, 2014, 08:36:01 PM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
Is there some sort of a competition for how deep a three we can get before Stevens calls a play?

True. But If he called a play, would this band of buffoons actually execute?

If he's allowing players to just ignore him, how is that the players' fault?

Mike

Re: Celtics (10-17) at Wizards (20-8) Game #28 12/27/14
« Reply #224 on: December 27, 2014, 08:36:01 PM »

Offline Nerf DPOY

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2509
  • Tommy Points: 377
The two games before this Bradley was 14-27 from the field, including 7-11 from 3. He starts out 0-5 tonight so by all means, pop your heads back up groundhogs and tell everyone how he can't shoot. :)