You could, if you wanted, go through and exhaustively look at the last three or so playoff runs from the C's 2010-2012 (around the time Rondo came into his own as a star in his own right), and eliminate the generalities from your point. I don't blame you for not doing so, because it's an effort, though.
You could also go through the last regular seasons from the same time and find out which teams the C's played over that span that were playoff teams, and see how Rondo did against Playoff Caliber opponents -- from both Conferences, no less, which would give you a better idea of how Rondo fares against the best talent in the NBA, rather than the Best in the East (bolstered by some Leastern Conference bottom of the bracket squads that we played when the team was winning games, no less).
If anyone wants to do that, you can find all the pertinent data here:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/BOS/
D.o.s - I really appreciate your input in this topic discussion.
I may very well be interested in checking those games and see how productive Rondo has been against all WC elite teams.
But what I will do is stress the emphasis that I feel the best course of action for our franchise's rebuilding process is to keep our top level talent and not lose them.
We should be adding more talent to our current pool, not losing our current pool of talent.
We should also be developing our young pool.
To better develop the youngsters, I feel that Rondo's presence will benefit the process greatly.
I feel that with more games, Stevens will learn more about Rondo and vice versa. Brad Steven's experiences with Rondo is of a Rondo still recovering from past injuries. It is not experiences of a "recovered Rondo".
I feel if our youngsters learn from Rondo, through practices or even watching film of Rondo or watching from the bench......all will enhance the youngsters' development.
It's easy to learn and gain experience from "on the job" type scenarios.
It's a LUXURY to learn and gain experience from a top tier talented teammate.
Would "trigger happy" Allen Iverson been a different player had he started and played his entire career with a Jason Kidd (no offense Eric Snow, you are welcome to my team any time).
What about AI with a Terrell Brandon or a Mike Bibby?
Had he started his career learning from and playing with top tier talent, I feel Iverson would have developed into a more efficient scoring guard who was still capable of making plays to setup his other teammates.
Just look at AI on Denver and just by giving AI a top tier talented scorer, AI was able to sustain his high level production, but he was able to improve his efficiency, across the board, greatly. All his FG%/TS%/eFG% they all went up while AI was Nugget.
Imagine AI starting his career with a RR.
I'm not saying we have anyone as close to an AI on our squad, but I am saying we do have a top tier level PG and we shouldn't let him go play somewhere else. Offer RR the max. Our future youngsters will thank you and pay you back later. (Hopefully with another banner.)