Author Topic: Would Ainge bring back Perk with the trade exception before letting it expire?  (Read 12183 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
It looks like something that would make sense for the Celtics and for the Thunder.

- The Celtics get a player that they're familiar with, fills a need and on an expiring contract.
- The Thunder acquire their own trade exemption and open up more financial flexibility.

What do you think of this possibility?
« Last Edit: June 14, 2014, 09:36:59 AM by JSD »

Re: Would Ainge bring back Perk with the trade exception?
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2014, 09:12:47 AM »

Offline Aymanelgowainy

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 297
  • Tommy Points: 6
1. Id rather throw in a pick with the TPE and get Asik
2. Im not so sure the thunder are ready to throw in Adams as a starting center and Nick Collison provides valuable bemch minutes
3. Not sure what the Thunder would do with the cap space as there are no major FA... I think they would just stick with their group for another year until a couple of contracts expire next year and then theyd go after Aldridge or Gasol, etc

Re: Would Ainge bring back Perk with the trade exception?
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2014, 09:14:11 AM »

Offline sofutomygaha

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2586
  • Tommy Points: 343

I've wondered this myself. I have a starry-eyed fantasy that a reunion with Rondo would rejuvenate him.

Re: Would Ainge bring back Perk with the trade exception?
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2014, 09:20:22 AM »

Offline ctrey

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 673
  • Tommy Points: 110
I hate to say it but Perk is toast.

Re: Would Ainge bring back Perk with the trade exception?
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2014, 09:23:31 AM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32337
  • Tommy Points: 10099
never happen.  love Perk but he's not even a shadow of his former self

Re: Would Ainge bring back Perk with the trade exception?
« Reply #5 on: June 14, 2014, 09:25:13 AM »

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18197
  • Tommy Points: 2748
  • bammokja

I've wondered this myself. I have a starry-eyed fantasy that a reunion with Rondo would rejuvenate him.
either that or you have been enjoying too many drinks.  ;)

perk is a bad, very bad nba player right now, and will be for the rest of his career in all probability. he adds nothing of value in terms of building a future for the celtics and would simply eat up minutes for younger players on the team, who need to develop.

lets look at this another way. given perk's sad stats, immobility, god awful offense, and bloated contract, if he had NEVER BEEN A CELTIC, who here would be clamoring for the celtics to acquire him?

this is a case of going with someone who is familiar not because they are good, but because they are familiar.

unless of course folks are advocating a grand reunion with gg, walker, our-melo (tm), pierce, and brooks.  who wouldnt want that??  ::)
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Re: Would Ainge bring back Perk with the trade exception?
« Reply #6 on: June 14, 2014, 09:31:59 AM »

Offline celticslove

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1760
  • Tommy Points: 188
no please no. perk is done, only thing he'd resurrect here is his patented scowl.

Re: Would Ainge bring back Perk with the trade exception?
« Reply #7 on: June 14, 2014, 09:33:53 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
Gerald Green? We wouldn't be able to acquire him through absorbing, he would come at a cost. Perk is as low risk as bringing Antoine back in 2005 was. Perk would fit into a 3-man rotation with Olynk and Sullinger, and his expiring contract is more of an asset than simply letting our TE expire, and that's really the only scenario in which this becomes a reality.

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
Bring back Perk using the exception? Only if his intention would be to get fired for having the worst move of the offseason.

Offline Waew

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 775
  • Tommy Points: 50
perk? you mean whats left of him? 0 pts 0 reb?

Offline obnoxiousmime

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2428
  • Tommy Points: 261
Stop trolling our board, Sam Presti!!!  >:(

Offline TwinTower14

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1119
  • Tommy Points: 48
Only way he would be productive is if he found a time machine and could play with the 2008 version of KG.

Offline Sketch5

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3247
  • Tommy Points: 281
I'd be fine if we could just send Wallace over for Perk. Maybe we can get Lamb if we sweeten the deal a bit.

OKC probably wont go for it, but DA could say, "remember when you sent us a broken Green, and he lost a year with us?"

Offline ManUp

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8511
  • Tommy Points: 285
  • Rondo doesn't believe in easy buckets...
If OKC throws in Jeremy Lamb I would do it.

Assuming the TE is just going to expire.

Offline colincb

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5095
  • Tommy Points: 501
No.