Author Topic: RealGM source: "Love deal to Boston pretty much done"  (Read 59613 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: RealGM source: "Love deal to Boston pretty much done"
« Reply #150 on: June 04, 2014, 05:02:09 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
as long as we don't do what NY did a couple years ago for Melo. They gutted half their roster for Melo and it got them no where. 2 1st round exits, 1 2nd round exit and missed playoffs...

There are two key differences:

One is that James Dolan supposedly took over negotiation of the deal and gave Denver everything they wanted, over internal objections by people such as Donnie Walsh.  That's not going to happen in Boston.

Two is that Kevin Love is a better player than Carmelo Anthony.

Kevin Love is not, by any stretch of the imagination,  a better player than Carmelo.  The only thing Love does better is rebounding.  Melo has proven to be better at everything else,  including scoring,  defending and (most importantly) winning.
Love scored a whole 1.2 points less per game more efficiently than Carmelo.

Love is a very good scorer, he's just not an isolation guy like Carmelo. The good news is that Love knows this and doesn't iso very often.

Re: RealGM source: "Love deal to Boston pretty much done"
« Reply #151 on: June 04, 2014, 05:17:54 PM »

Offline Eddie20

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8497
  • Tommy Points: 975
What? You don't think Curry is the team's primary ballhandler/ offense initiator? He had 8.5 apg, doubling up Iggy's second most of 4.2 He also averaged 24 ppg, which was 6 more than Thompson's 18 ppg.

His assists to turnover ratio won't be as strong as Rondo's because he actually has the ability to shoot and score the ball, so he looks for his shot much more than Rondo. However, when you count his 8.5 apg and 24 ppg that's 41 points that he's accounting for. Rondo's best season in that regard he accounted for 35.9.

1.  Jarrett Jack was GSW's primary ballhandler and the guy who initiated the offense last season.  Larry Bird may have scored the points but anyone who watched the Celtics play knew that Dennis Johnson was the guy running the offense.  Curry doesn't really do that, yet still turns the ball over a lot.

2.  I don't think you understand the assist-to-turnover concept.

Mike

1. This past season Curry was their primary ballhandler as he was last year. Do they put him off the ball? Sure. They run him off picks to free him up from ballhandling duties. Again, being the sole ballhandler and the primary one are two totally different things.

2. I understand the stat, but I'm explaining how Curry is hurt in that department because he can actually shoot the ball. If Curry didn't play to his shooting strength, and instead passed the ball more often, his assists would increase, but his game/team production will suffer as a result. So he gets penalized in this stat because he looks for his shot more.

Edit: DJ usually brought the ball down the court (Ainge sometimes did too), but make no mistake that Bird was the one that was facilitating and running that offense.

This makes no sense at all. 

Since when does shooting more cause a player to generate more turnovers?  Is a player shooting the ball in to the opponents hands?   Unless the offensive player is frequently running head first in to the defense and losing the ball  (which is a problem in itself) then talking more shots should not push your.assist/To ratio upwards.

Usually pass first players have higher turnover numbers because it's easier to throw a bad pass (or have a pass deflected. / teammate fumble it)  then it is to throw a 3pt shot directly to an opponent.

Chris Paul is the rare exception.  Hes a pass first PG who has always had an elite assist/to ratio

You're missing the point. What I'm saying is that when a player handles the ball a lot (see Westbrook, Curry, Irving) they will generate a lot of turnovers. It goes with the territory. However, in regards to assist to turnover ratio, Curry would have a better ratio if he passed the ball more, subsequently accumulating more assists, since his great shooting ability has no relevancy with that specific stat.

That stat actually hurts playmakers, which is why you see Josh McRoberts ranked #2 overall in assist to turnover ratio, and players such as Prigioni, Wolters, Dellavedova, Battier, and Prince rounding out the top 20.

Re: RealGM source: "Love deal to Boston pretty much done"
« Reply #152 on: June 04, 2014, 06:11:01 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
What? You don't think Curry is the team's primary ballhandler/ offense initiator? He had 8.5 apg, doubling up Iggy's second most of 4.2 He also averaged 24 ppg, which was 6 more than Thompson's 18 ppg.

His assists to turnover ratio won't be as strong as Rondo's because he actually has the ability to shoot and score the ball, so he looks for his shot much more than Rondo. However, when you count his 8.5 apg and 24 ppg that's 41 points that he's accounting for. Rondo's best season in that regard he accounted for 35.9.

1.  Jarrett Jack was GSW's primary ballhandler and the guy who initiated the offense last season.  Larry Bird may have scored the points but anyone who watched the Celtics play knew that Dennis Johnson was the guy running the offense.  Curry doesn't really do that, yet still turns the ball over a lot.

2.  I don't think you understand the assist-to-turnover concept.

Mike

1. This past season Curry was their primary ballhandler as he was last year. Do they put him off the ball? Sure. They run him off picks to free him up from ballhandling duties. Again, being the sole ballhandler and the primary one are two totally different things.

2. I understand the stat, but I'm explaining how Curry is hurt in that department because he can actually shoot the ball. If Curry didn't play to his shooting strength, and instead passed the ball more often, his assists would increase, but his game/team production will suffer as a result. So he gets penalized in this stat because he looks for his shot more.

Edit: DJ usually brought the ball down the court (Ainge sometimes did too), but make no mistake that Bird was the one that was facilitating and running that offense.

This makes no sense at all. 

Since when does shooting more cause a player to generate more turnovers?  Is a player shooting the ball in to the opponents hands?   Unless the offensive player is frequently running head first in to the defense and losing the ball  (which is a problem in itself) then talking more shots should not push your.assist/To ratio upwards.

Usually pass first players have higher turnover numbers because it's easier to throw a bad pass (or have a pass deflected. / teammate fumble it)  then it is to throw a 3pt shot directly to an opponent.

Chris Paul is the rare exception.  Hes a pass first PG who has always had an elite assist/to ratio

You're missing the point. What I'm saying is that when a player handles the ball a lot (see Westbrook, Curry, Irving) they will generate a lot of turnovers. It goes with the territory. However, in regards to assist to turnover ratio, Curry would have a better ratio if he passed the ball more, subsequently accumulating more assists, since his great shooting ability has no relevancy with that specific stat.


  What you're missing is that the more players pass the ball the more turnovers they have, and that Curry, even though he doesn't pass the ball a ton, makes almost 2/3 of his turnovers from bad passes. If you break the turnovers up between passing and non-passing turnovers it's easier to compare Rondo to Curry.

  If you look at non-passing turnovers, Rondo's better. He commits slightly fewer turnovers per minute played. But you also have to consider that Rondo handles the ball much more than Curry does. Rondo has the ball about 23% of the time he's on the court and Curry has the ball about 18% of the time he's on the court. If you just consider how often they commit non-passing turnovers per minute handling the ball Curry commits them about 30% more frequently than Rondo.

  If you look at passing turnovers the difference is worse.If you get (from nba.com data) the total number of passes Curry made this year and divide it by the total number of passing turnovers he made about 1 turnover on every 21 passes.. Rondo committed 1 turnover for every 34 or so passes he made. That's Rondo coming back from a major injury in mid-season with a bunch of new teammates that aren't used to his passes. The difference would be wider otherwise.

  The inescapable conclusion is that the only reason Curry doesn't turn the ball over more often than Rondo is that he doesn't handle the ball or pass the ball as often as Rondo.

Re: RealGM source: "Love deal to Boston pretty much done"
« Reply #153 on: June 04, 2014, 06:12:26 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
I think this thread has jumped the shark.
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman