Um, no. just no.
Jordan won with less talent on his team. he didn't need to collude with 2 other all-stars to play together to rig the odds in his favor. I'll be the first to say he's not the GOAT and he won titles in a less-talented time in the NBA but I'd take Jordan over Lebron without a second thought.
Jordan played with multiple all stars and a top 50 player in league history. So you are saying we should credit him for the good fortune of being drafted to a team that didn't have terrible management and ownership and hold that against James. Jordan didn't win a single playoff series until he had Pippen. Pippen who was a top 5 draft pick mind you.
Magic Johnson said that he would have returned to Michigan State if the Lakers didn't win the coin flip as he didn't want to go to Chicago. Why not give him crap for that?
"I'd have stayed in school," he said here Tuesday, standing alone outside Gate 3 1/2 of Chicago Stadium, the house that could have been his. "A coin toss changed the course of my whole life."
"I wouldn't have played here," Johnson said on the eve of Game 2 of the NBA finals between his team and the team that could have been his. "The only reason I came out was to play with Kareem and the Lakers.
http://articles.latimes.com/1991-06-05/sports/sp-83_1_lakersKobe Bryant refused to play for Charlotte forcing a trade to the Lakers, why not give him crap for that?
But it is only Lebron James he gets crap for wanting to play with quality teammates. Had Cleveland actually had decent management, James never would have left and would have won multiple titles in Cleveland. He is quite simply just that good. Cleveland just could never appropriately build a team around him (imagine if they would have kept Boozer, things might have been different).