Author Topic: KO...yes or no???  (Read 25061 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #30 on: March 12, 2014, 08:12:17 PM »

Offline Mazingerz

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1257
  • Tommy Points: 99
We Keep him. We have him on team control for 4 years, and he has had more games excelling versus his fellow rookies.

Peavey Bass Player - relearning to play after 10 years sucks;

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #31 on: March 13, 2014, 01:06:35 PM »

Offline PickNRoll

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1691
  • Tommy Points: 199
A few months ago I had nearly given up on Olynyk.  Now, I'm starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel.  He's underdeveloped in a way similar to Gerald Green.  Even though Green has always been able to jump out of the gym, he's only recently come to terms with his limited lateral mobility.  He either spots up OR he drives (only) when he comes off a pick clean.  He rarely drives after facing up an opponent. His first step just isn't good enough, but it took him years to understand that.  He hasn't learned any NEW talents per se, but he understands his limits now and the results speak for themselves. He's aware of how matchups should impact his decisions.  I think KO faces a similar trajectory.  Should be fun to watch.

I never thought I'd see Kelly Olynyk compared to Gerald Green.
What do you mean? There has never been a player more like Gerald Green in the history of the Boston Celtics.
The comparison was more mental -- understanding your limits.  They're both a little knock-kneed too, which presents some similar problems for them.  That's where the comp ends.

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #32 on: March 13, 2014, 01:19:56 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
FWIW, he's 6th on the KIA rookie ladder and imo has a higher upside than some of the other pople above him.

definitely. Compare Cody Zeller , Alex Len stats vs KO's . None of them have multiple 17 plus point and several 20 point games
Adam Morrison had 21 17-plus point games in his rookie year. I guess it's alright because he also has 2 NBA championships to show for it.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #33 on: March 13, 2014, 03:33:18 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
FWIW, he's 6th on the KIA rookie ladder and imo has a higher upside than some of the other pople above him.

definitely. Compare Cody Zeller , Alex Len stats vs KO's . None of them have multiple 17 plus point and several 20 point games
Adam Morrison had 21 17-plus point games in his rookie year. I guess it's alright because he also has 2 NBA championships to show for it.

Yi Jianlan might be an even better comp for KO's first season, in scoring and many other areas - except that Yi was only 20 in his rookie year and KO is 22.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fSYLT

(Edit: actually Yi might also have been 22. I forgot about his age issues.)
« Last Edit: March 13, 2014, 03:46:22 PM by Boris Badenov »

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #34 on: March 13, 2014, 04:00:04 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
FWIW, he's 6th on the KIA rookie ladder and imo has a higher upside than some of the other pople above him.

definitely. Compare Cody Zeller , Alex Len stats vs KO's . None of them have multiple 17 plus point and several 20 point games

Pretty interesting players to compare and contrast:
http://bkref.com/tiny/OWApm


Also - Olynyk averages 6.1 fouls per 36. Hahahaha.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #35 on: March 13, 2014, 04:15:34 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
FWIW, he's 6th on the KIA rookie ladder and imo has a higher upside than some of the other pople above him.

definitely. Compare Cody Zeller , Alex Len stats vs KO's . None of them have multiple 17 plus point and several 20 point games
Adam Morrison had 21 17-plus point games in his rookie year. I guess it's alright because he also has 2 NBA championships to show for it.

Yi Jianlan might be an even better comp for KO's first season, in scoring and many other areas - except that Yi was only 20 in his rookie year and KO is 22.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fSYLT

(Edit: actually Yi might also have been 22. I forgot about his age issues.)


Looks like KO is a significantly better rebounder and passer, and also has a legitimate 3 point shot.  Also KO has much better ORTG / DRTG compared to Yi's horrible 98/112.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #36 on: March 13, 2014, 04:36:23 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Looks like KO is a significantly better rebounder and passer, and also has a legitimate 3 point shot.  Also KO has much better ORTG / DRTG compared to Yi's horrible 98/112.
Yi is a .333 career three-point shooter. Also, I haven't found the BBRef ORTG/DRTG to be any useful, but that's just me.

In any case, all I wanted to point out is that having a handful of big scoring games doesn't really mean much -- especially on a god-awful team.
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #37 on: March 13, 2014, 05:16:24 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Looks like KO is a significantly better rebounder and passer, and also has a legitimate 3 point shot.  Also KO has much better ORTG / DRTG compared to Yi's horrible 98/112.
Yi is a .333 career three-point shooter. Also, I haven't found the BBRef ORTG/DRTG to be any useful, but that's just me.

In any case, all I wanted to point out is that having a handful of big scoring games doesn't really mean much -- especially on a god-awful team.


Looking at least at his rookie year numbers, he averaged 1 3 point attempt every other game, and he hit less than 30% of them.

You're right, though, plenty of rookies who have nice scoring nights playing for bad teams never amount to anything.

Still, at least for me, KO passes the eye test as a guy who has the size and skills to become a pretty useful player.  That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to get there.

Also -- just because a guy (like Yi, or Morrison) didn't end up sticking around in the league doesn't mean he never had the skills or physical attributes to do it.  Each guy, I think, had the potential to become a useful role player, albeit a fairly limited one.  Neither guy realized that potential, for whatever reason.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #38 on: March 13, 2014, 05:34:46 PM »

Offline kozlodoev

  • NCE
  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17914
  • Tommy Points: 1294
Still, at least for me, KO passes the eye test as a guy who has the size and skills to become a pretty useful player.  That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to get there.
I agree with that. But I feel the degree of usefulness is still unclear -- he may end up being useful in the Matt Bonner/Steve Novak way.

Ultimately, thought, it's worth noting that those two are only in the league because they're automatic from three point range, and Olynyk isn't (and probably won't ever really be).
"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve."

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #39 on: March 13, 2014, 05:43:40 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Still, at least for me, KO passes the eye test as a guy who has the size and skills to become a pretty useful player.  That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to get there.
I agree with that. But I feel the degree of usefulness is still unclear -- he may end up being useful in the Matt Bonner/Steve Novak way.

Ultimately, thought, it's worth noting that those two are only in the league because they're automatic from three point range, and Olynyk isn't (and probably won't ever really be).

It's also worth pointing out that Klynyk has a waaay more diverse basketball skill set than either of those two have ever had. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #40 on: March 13, 2014, 06:03:09 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Still, at least for me, KO passes the eye test as a guy who has the size and skills to become a pretty useful player.  That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to get there.
I agree with that. But I feel the degree of usefulness is still unclear -- he may end up being useful in the Matt Bonner/Steve Novak way.

Ultimately, thought, it's worth noting that those two are only in the league because they're automatic from three point range, and Olynyk isn't (and probably won't ever really be).

It's also worth pointing out that Klynyk has a waaay more diverse basketball skill set than either of those two have ever had.

It's not about having a diverse skill set, though. It's about being able to do at least one thing well enough to stay in the NBA.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #41 on: March 13, 2014, 08:12:34 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469
Still, at least for me, KO passes the eye test as a guy who has the size and skills to become a pretty useful player.  That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to get there.
I agree with that. But I feel the degree of usefulness is still unclear -- he may end up being useful in the Matt Bonner/Steve Novak way.

Ultimately, thought, it's worth noting that those two are only in the league because they're automatic from three point range, and Olynyk isn't (and probably won't ever really be).

It's also worth pointing out that Klynyk has a waaay more diverse basketball skill set than either of those two have ever had.

It's not about having a diverse skill set, though. It's about being able to do at least one thing well enough to stay in the NBA.

. . . if your ceiling is that of a role playing specialist, which I don't believe Kelly's is.
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #42 on: March 13, 2014, 08:44:25 PM »

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
Still, at least for me, KO passes the eye test as a guy who has the size and skills to become a pretty useful player.  That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to get there.
I agree with that. But I feel the degree of usefulness is still unclear -- he may end up being useful in the Matt Bonner/Steve Novak way.

Ultimately, thought, it's worth noting that those two are only in the league because they're automatic from three point range, and Olynyk isn't (and probably won't ever really be).

It's also worth pointing out that Klynyk has a waaay more diverse basketball skill set than either of those two have ever had.

It's not about having a diverse skill set, though. It's about being able to do at least one thing well enough to stay in the NBA.

Kelly Olynyk is good at being seven-foot-tall.  Many worse but equally tall players have carved out journeymen careers of decent length.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #43 on: March 13, 2014, 08:52:02 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Still, at least for me, KO passes the eye test as a guy who has the size and skills to become a pretty useful player.  That doesn't mean he's guaranteed to get there.
I agree with that. But I feel the degree of usefulness is still unclear -- he may end up being useful in the Matt Bonner/Steve Novak way.

Ultimately, thought, it's worth noting that those two are only in the league because they're automatic from three point range, and Olynyk isn't (and probably won't ever really be).

It's also worth pointing out that Klynyk has a waaay more diverse basketball skill set than either of those two have ever had.

It's not about having a diverse skill set, though. It's about being able to do at least one thing well enough to stay in the NBA.

Kelly Olynyk is good at being seven-foot-tall.  Many worse but equally tall players have carved out journeymen careers of decent length.

Yup. I expect him to get one more multi-year NBA contract.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: KO...yes or no???
« Reply #44 on: March 13, 2014, 09:53:39 PM »

Offline dreamgreen

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3558
  • Tommy Points: 182
A few months ago I had nearly given up on Olynyk.  Now, I'm starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel.  He's underdeveloped in a way similar to Gerald Green.  Even though Green has always been able to jump out of the gym, he's only recently come to terms with his limited lateral mobility.  He either spots up OR he drives (only) when he comes off a pick clean.  He rarely drives after facing up an opponent. His first step just isn't good enough, but it took him years to understand that.  He hasn't learned any NEW talents per se, but he understands his limits now and the results speak for themselves. He's aware of how matchups should impact his decisions.  I think KO faces a similar trajectory.  Should be fun to watch.

I never thought I'd see Kelly Olynyk compared to Gerald Green.
What do you mean? There has never been a player more like Gerald Green in the history of the Boston Celtics.
The comparison was more mental -- understanding your limits.  They're both a little knock-kneed too, which presents some similar problems for them.  That's where the comp ends.

So glad you said that I have been thinking about that, you must have been the same person who said that about Gerald Green years age. Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline. does that mean?