Author Topic: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen  (Read 20747 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #30 on: January 20, 2014, 01:25:20 PM »

Offline lon3lytoaster

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Word aapp!
Or for the love of God. I'd still take old Judas over AB.

Bradley is not a starter on a championship team, sorry. He's not developing a shooter's mentality, he's developing into a chucker.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #31 on: January 20, 2014, 01:27:19 PM »

Offline Enzzo

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 238
  • Tommy Points: 16
Celtics fans are harsh people and a lot of us have issues with Ray Allen, but this is a serious reach. I like AB, but he will never be = Ray Allen let alone > Ray Allen.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #32 on: January 20, 2014, 01:31:23 PM »

Offline GreenWarrior

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3275
  • Tommy Points: 228
avery Bradley will be lucky to go watch ray allen get inducted into the hall of fame.

...wow!

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #33 on: January 20, 2014, 01:31:32 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Or for the love of God. I'd still take old Judas over AB.

Bradley is not a starter on a championship team, sorry. He's not developing a shooter's mentality, he's developing into a chucker.

That's a glass-half full/glass half-empty bit of hair splitting, I think.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #34 on: January 20, 2014, 01:49:35 PM »

fitzhickey

  • Guest
Someone is forgetting how good Jesus was. He's a HOFer, Bradley will never be that good.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #35 on: January 20, 2014, 02:03:33 PM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
Or for the love of God. I'd still take old Judas over AB.

Bradley is not a starter on a championship team, sorry. He's not developing a shooter's mentality, he's developing into a chucker.

And I don't pay 9 large for a chucker. I'm fine with moving him.
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #36 on: January 20, 2014, 02:27:18 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Not even close

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #37 on: January 20, 2014, 02:36:58 PM »

Offline Pucaccia

  • NCE
  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 558
  • Tommy Points: 65
Bradley will be great. He's 23, only 1 year of college.
2 major injuries keeping him from 2 training camps. He is just developing his game.
Give him time and he will just as valuable as Ray Allen for the Celtics.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #38 on: January 20, 2014, 02:42:58 PM »

Offline D.o.s.

  • NCE
  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14061
  • Tommy Points: 1239
Bradley will be great. He's 23, only 1 year of college.
2 major injuries keeping him from 2 training camps. He is just developing his game.
Give him time and he will just as valuable as Ray Allen for the Celtics.

That's a more reasonable statement, but still very farfetched.
At least a goldfish with a Lincoln Log on its back goin' across your floor to your sock drawer has a miraculous connotation to it.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #39 on: January 20, 2014, 02:56:38 PM »

Offline R6Caruso

  • Neemias Queta
  • Posts: 10
  • Tommy Points: 2
The topic should read 23 year old Avery Bradley > 38 year old Ray Allen... food for thought: in 9 games since the new year at almost 28 minutes a game Ray Ray has averaged 5.7 points and is shooting a horrible .22% from the field... No need to look up Bradley's numbers because there's no question he's outperforming that. The Heat are 5-4 with an overtime win and loss in that span. I like to think Ray's poor play has a lot to do with those losses  ;D
"When all of our games are on, that's when we've played at our best."

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #40 on: January 20, 2014, 03:19:07 PM »

Offline crimson_stallion

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5964
  • Tommy Points: 875
Or for the love of God. I'd still take old Judas over AB.

Bradley is not a starter on a championship team, sorry. He's not developing a shooter's mentality, he's developing into a chucker.

He's shooting about 45% from the field and nearly 40% from three.  They are very good numbers foraguard, and not the numbers ofa chucker.  If your putting up those percentages then either you have solid shot selection, or you''re just really, really good..   

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #41 on: January 20, 2014, 04:03:02 PM »

Offline Smokeeye123

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2374
  • Tommy Points: 156
Yes Avery bradley is > Ray Allen just like how Greg Steimsma is > Bill Russell

OP....seriously?  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #42 on: January 20, 2014, 04:11:09 PM »

Offline RRNoLookPass

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 128
  • Tommy Points: 15
Or for the love of God. I'd still take old Judas over AB.

Bradley is not a starter on a championship team, sorry. He's not developing a shooter's mentality, he's developing into a chucker.

He's shooting about 45% from the field and nearly 40% from three.  They are very good numbers foraguard, and not the numbers ofa chucker.  If your putting up those percentages then either you have solid shot selection, or you''re just really, really good..

I completely agree. I mean, his 3p% is actually down to like .365% after lastnight's rough 0-5 long range performance, but his numbers are still solid. Definitely better than average. I don't understand where this "Bradley is a chucker" mentality is coming from. Shooting guards are supposed to shoot, aren't they? And it helps that Bradley has been doing so efficiently all season, normally hovering around 40% from 3p range. That doesn't sound like a chucker to me.

And when Rondo gets back into a rhythm, and starts consistently dropping Bradley those sweet dimes for his favorite corner 3 every game, his numbers should only get better.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #43 on: January 20, 2014, 04:19:24 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32370
  • Tommy Points: 10100
Or for the love of God. I'd still take old Judas over AB.

Bradley is not a starter on a championship team, sorry. He's not developing a shooter's mentality, he's developing into a chucker.

He's shooting about 45% from the field and nearly 40% from three.  They are very good numbers foraguard, and not the numbers ofa chucker.  If your putting up those percentages then either you have solid shot selection, or you''re just really, really good..
he'd be a good guard off the bench, not a starter and especially not a closer.  rarely does anything good happen when he has the ball at the end of a game in a crunch situation.  take the past 2 games for example-->a ball handler or distributor he is not.

Re: Bradley Potentially > Ray Allen
« Reply #44 on: January 20, 2014, 04:30:51 PM »

Offline RRNoLookPass

  • Joe Mazzulla
  • Posts: 128
  • Tommy Points: 15

he'd be a good guard off the bench, not a starter and especially not a closer.  rarely does anything good happen when he has the ball at the end of a game in a crunch situation.  take the past 2 games for example-->a ball handler or distributor he is not.

I think he is fine as the starter, and should be locked up for that role moving forward. Him and Rondo are the backcourt of the future. I agree he hasn't made many clutch plays recently, but he is probably still trying to get comfortable in that clutch shooter role. He was never really needed in clutch situations in the past, with Pierce & Ray the designated go-to clutch guys his first 2-3yrs in the league.

Nobody can argue that Bradley is a good handler or distributor, because he isn't. But he is a solid shooter and a great cutter, and he has RR as his backcourt mate to take care of the majority of the passing and the ball-handling.