We keep Bradley, but for only 5 or 6 mill. Tony Allen who is probably the best comparison gets just under 4. Bradley is a better shooter and is quicker on defense, but Allen has 2 inches and over 30lbs on Bradley. In the playoffs that would make a difference were it slows down and the refs allow more contact.
The fact that teams haven't taken advantage of posting up AB is a bit surprising. If Kobe played last night he would have been owned all night.
I like him as a spark off the bench, but for starting SG going into the future, I'm not comfortable with paying him 8+ a year, and have him starting.
So basically I say keep, but only at 5 or 6 mill and if we can get a better scoring SF and or C, or have him come off the bench.
Here are Tony Allen's salaries the next three years:
2014-2015: $4,831,461
2015-2016: $5,168,539
2016-2017: $5,505,618
A few things about that:
1) Tony Allen is not getting paid just under $4 million. He'll average over $5 million per year the first three years of whatever contract Avery signs this off-season. If you want to use what Tony Allen gets paid as a comparison, use the correct numbers.
2) Tony Allen turned 32 a week ago. This contract is paying him until he's 35. He will be getting worse over the life of this contract.
3) Avery Bradley is 23. He will likely improve as a player over the life of his next contract. Sure, it's not a guarantee, but it's very highly likely, as a) he's improved every year so far, pretty significantly, and b) most NBA players continue to improve into their mid-to-late 20's.
Accordingly, AB should command significantly more than Tony Allen. Even if I buy the argument that Bradley is equivalent to TA right now (and I think Bradley has passed him at this point), he is going to be worth a lot more to teams over the course of his next deal than Allen. $6 million would be an absolute bargain. Less than that he should fire his agent, and hire Tony Allen's agent.