Author Topic: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.  (Read 16976 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #45 on: November 03, 2013, 02:01:59 PM »

Offline sed522002

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2280
  • Tommy Points: 221
So I guess Thibs isn't a coach after his team gave up a 20pt lead to the Sixers? And we Never gave up big leads with the Kg/PP/Doc era  ::)

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #46 on: November 03, 2013, 04:01:13 PM »

Offline Meadowlark_Scal

  • NCE
  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8193
  • Tommy Points: 670
  • You say when......
Well..Crawford is too wild...and more suited for the and1 league.....he has no consistent form at all....

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #47 on: November 03, 2013, 04:20:41 PM »

Offline Snakehead

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6846
  • Tommy Points: 448
This season is going to be long, especially on these boards, and I'm going to just keep laughing as a way to cope with some of the things I'm going to have to read.
"I really don't want people to understand me." - Jordan Crawford

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #48 on: November 03, 2013, 07:30:53 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182


Anybody with basic NBA knowledge can look at this roster and see that it's a jumble of disparate parts and only perhaps 4 or 5 of these players is even being honestly evaluated for the purpose of maybe sticking around long term.  The rest are dust in the wind.


There are fourteen (fifteen, counting Colton Iverson) players on this team being "honestly evaluated."  The chances of many of them "sticking around long term" are admittedly slim, but that doesn't mean that Danny and the coaching staff aren't invested in all of them.  They are paying them to be here, and they want to get the best out of them. 

The only players on the team right now who I think have a real chance of being with the team beyond their current contracts are, in order of likelihood:

1. Olynyk
2. Sullinger
3. Faverani
4. Rondo
5. Bradley
6. Pressey

The rest I think are trade bait or destined to be let go once their contracts expire.

The team is undoubtedly evaluating every single player on the roster, but I don't think many of them are being looked at as future pieces.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #49 on: November 03, 2013, 07:53:14 PM »

Offline slamtheking

  • NCE
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32360
  • Tommy Points: 10099


Anybody with basic NBA knowledge can look at this roster and see that it's a jumble of disparate parts and only perhaps 4 or 5 of these players is even being honestly evaluated for the purpose of maybe sticking around long term.  The rest are dust in the wind.


There are fourteen (fifteen, counting Colton Iverson) players on this team being "honestly evaluated."  The chances of many of them "sticking around long term" are admittedly slim, but that doesn't mean that Danny and the coaching staff aren't invested in all of them.  They are paying them to be here, and they want to get the best out of them. 

The only players on the team right now who I think have a real chance of being with the team beyond their current contracts are, in order of likelihood:

1. Olynyk
2. Sullinger
3. Faverani
4. Rondo
5. Bradley
6. Pressey

The rest I think are trade bait or destined to be let go once their contracts expire.

The team is undoubtedly evaluating every single player on the roster, but I don't think many of them are being looked at as future pieces.
I might swap Green for Pressey but I agree they're all being evaluated -- if for no other than to judge their trade value.

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #50 on: November 03, 2013, 08:30:54 PM »

Offline Celtics4ever

  • NCE
  • Johnny Most
  • ********************
  • Posts: 20148
  • Tommy Points: 1335
Quote
Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.


and Bradley is not a PG!

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #51 on: November 03, 2013, 09:14:56 PM »

Offline Fan from VT

  • NCE
  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4205
  • Tommy Points: 777
Honest question:

Can you evaluate whether a coach has the ability to manage an NBA starting lineup if he has no players that should be starting in the NBA?

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #52 on: November 03, 2013, 09:19:22 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37808
  • Tommy Points: 3030


Anybody with basic NBA knowledge can look at this roster and see that it's a jumble of disparate parts and only perhaps 4 or 5 of these players is even being honestly evaluated for the purpose of maybe sticking around long term.  The rest are dust in the wind.


There are fourteen (fifteen, counting Colton Iverson) players on this team being "honestly evaluated."  The chances of many of them "sticking around long term" are admittedly slim, but that doesn't mean that Danny and the coaching staff aren't invested in all of them.  They are paying them to be here, and they want to get the best out of them. 

The only players on the team right now who I think have a real chance of being with the team beyond their current contracts are, in order of likelihood:

1. Olynyk
2. Sullinger
3. Faverani
4. Rondo
5. Bradley
6. Pressey

The rest I think are trade bait or destined to be let go once their contracts expire.

The team is undoubtedly evaluating every single player on the roster, but I don't think many of them are being looked at as future pieces.
I might swap Green for Pressey but I agree they're all being evaluated -- if for no other than to judge their trade value.

Suspect.  The above statement pretty much is the root of the truth .....and many of those players know it.   They are trying to improve their stock as well......to keep from joining Fab Melo in the Iraqi basketball league

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #53 on: November 03, 2013, 09:21:19 PM »

Offline Celtics18

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11688
  • Tommy Points: 1469


Anybody with basic NBA knowledge can look at this roster and see that it's a jumble of disparate parts and only perhaps 4 or 5 of these players is even being honestly evaluated for the purpose of maybe sticking around long term.  The rest are dust in the wind.


There are fourteen (fifteen, counting Colton Iverson) players on this team being "honestly evaluated."  The chances of many of them "sticking around long term" are admittedly slim, but that doesn't mean that Danny and the coaching staff aren't invested in all of them.  They are paying them to be here, and they want to get the best out of them. 

The only players on the team right now who I think have a real chance of being with the team beyond their current contracts are, in order of likelihood:

1. Olynyk
2. Sullinger
3. Faverani
4. Rondo
5. Bradley
6. Pressey

The rest I think are trade bait or destined to be let go once their contracts expire.

The team is undoubtedly evaluating every single player on the roster, but I don't think many of them are being looked at as future pieces.

Thanks for the information.

It's always nice to hear from someone who has basic NBA knowledge. 
DKC Seventy-Sixers:

PG: G. Hill/D. Schroder
SG: C. Lee/B. Hield/T. Luwawu
SF:  Giannis/J. Lamb/M. Kuzminskas
PF:  E. Ilyasova/J. Jerebko/R. Christmas
C:    N. Vucevic/K. Olynyk/E. Davis/C. Jefferson

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #54 on: November 03, 2013, 10:25:04 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123


Anybody with basic NBA knowledge can look at this roster and see that it's a jumble of disparate parts and only perhaps 4 or 5 of these players is even being honestly evaluated for the purpose of maybe sticking around long term.  The rest are dust in the wind.


There are fourteen (fifteen, counting Colton Iverson) players on this team being "honestly evaluated."  The chances of many of them "sticking around long term" are admittedly slim, but that doesn't mean that Danny and the coaching staff aren't invested in all of them.  They are paying them to be here, and they want to get the best out of them. 

The only players on the team right now who I think have a real chance of being with the team beyond their current contracts are, in order of likelihood:

1. Olynyk
2. Sullinger
3. Faverani
4. Rondo
5. Bradley
6. Pressey

The rest I think are trade bait or destined to be let go once their contracts expire.

The team is undoubtedly evaluating every single player on the roster, but I don't think many of them are being looked at as future pieces.

  What exactly has Pressey done that makes you think he's going to be with the team for an extended period of time?

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #55 on: November 03, 2013, 10:35:45 PM »

Offline Snakehead

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6846
  • Tommy Points: 448


Anybody with basic NBA knowledge can look at this roster and see that it's a jumble of disparate parts and only perhaps 4 or 5 of these players is even being honestly evaluated for the purpose of maybe sticking around long term.  The rest are dust in the wind.


There are fourteen (fifteen, counting Colton Iverson) players on this team being "honestly evaluated."  The chances of many of them "sticking around long term" are admittedly slim, but that doesn't mean that Danny and the coaching staff aren't invested in all of them.  They are paying them to be here, and they want to get the best out of them. 

The only players on the team right now who I think have a real chance of being with the team beyond their current contracts are, in order of likelihood:

1. Olynyk
2. Sullinger
3. Faverani
4. Rondo
5. Bradley
6. Pressey

The rest I think are trade bait or destined to be let go once their contracts expire.

The team is undoubtedly evaluating every single player on the roster, but I don't think many of them are being looked at as future pieces.

  What exactly has Pressey done that makes you think he's going to be with the team for an extended period of time?

And Green not even on the list.

Celticsblogs forum!  A brave new world this season.
"I really don't want people to understand me." - Jordan Crawford

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #56 on: November 03, 2013, 11:04:49 PM »

Offline eugen

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1258
  • Tommy Points: 40
Chill out.  When you put together a talentless squad of rejects lead by a rookie coach, you're likely not going to win more than 25 games.

Do you really think this team can win 25 games? Are you kidding me???

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #57 on: November 03, 2013, 11:46:21 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182

  What exactly has Pressey done that makes you think he's going to be with the team for an extended period of time?

He's young, he's cheap, when he's gotten playing time he looks like he has the potential to be a serviceable backup.

That's why he makes it onto the bottom of my list; I wouldn't be surprised if he manages to stick around.  Also the fact that he was an undrafted FA means that being on the team beyond his current contract just means being on the team next year.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #58 on: November 03, 2013, 11:47:54 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182

And Green not even on the list.

Celticsblogs forum!  A brave new world this season.

Green is overpaid, he has really failed to emerge as a leader or focal point for this team with Rondo out, and if he isn't traded sometime in the next season or so, it'll only be because he's making too much money. 

I think Green will end up spending the latter part of his career much like Caron Butler -- making MLE money and getting passed around from one team to another, good enough to keep a job but not good enough to really make anybody want to pay to keep him.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Re: Wallace is right, Stevens is not an NBA coach, and Crawford is poison.
« Reply #59 on: November 03, 2013, 11:49:29 PM »

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182

It's always nice to hear from someone who has basic NBA knowledge.

Do you disagree that this roster is a jumble of disparate parts? 

Do you think the Celtics acquired Jordan Crawford, Gerald Wallace, Kris Humphries, Marshon Brooks, or Keith Bogans because they actually thought any of those guys might be keepers?

I don't think I said anything especially controversial.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain