Author Topic: Sullinger and Olynyk duo  (Read 81765 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #150 on: November 12, 2013, 07:30:38 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
I liked that Olynyk was looking to drive and create off the 3-pt line, but I wished he'd take a couple more, Vucevic was generally too slow to get out there.
And I like him much better when he's taking Garnett-style 16-18 ft jumpers. These look considerably more natural for him.

I agree. But he has looked better shooting the three the last two games. His form looks adjusted. Instead of winding back his arm too much, he is using his wrist more. It will be something else if he can hit the three around 37-38%.

He will draw out his man, leaving more room for the other guys to get into the paint

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #151 on: November 12, 2013, 07:58:22 PM »

Offline Edgar

  • Kevin McHale
  • ************************
  • Posts: 24646
  • Tommy Points: 445
  • No contaban con mi astucia !!!
1      Michael Carter-Williams
2      Victor Oladipo
3    NR   Vitor Faverani
4      Ben McLemore
5    NR   Nate Wolters
6      Kelly Olynyk

I know Faverani will lose his spot due playing time, but when was the last time a duo of rookies earns top 6 spot at the rookie ladder together?

I think ..... never?
Once a CrotorNat always a CROTORNAT  2 times CB draft Champion 2009-2012

Nice to be back!

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #152 on: November 13, 2013, 03:57:29 PM »

Offline erisred

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 650
  • Tommy Points: 37
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #153 on: November 13, 2013, 04:06:37 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Yeah, I see Sully somewhere in the Scola mold.  I don't see that with Olynyk though.  I just think he is really skinny, and I don't see that much room on his frame to get much bigger.

One guy who comes to mind with Olynyk is Rashard Lewis.  Younger Lewis was much more athletic, which made him a more dangerous player, but as he got older, I think he ended up right around where Kelly will be.  Really a true stretch 4.  Can do a little of everything, but his biggest weapon is his shot.  He doesn't have the strength to play in the post regularly, but he has the skills to go down there against certain matchups and do some damage. 

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #154 on: November 13, 2013, 04:10:55 PM »

Offline Snakehead

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6846
  • Tommy Points: 448
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Yeah, I see Sully somewhere in the Scola mold.  I don't see that with Olynyk though.  I just think he is really skinny, and I don't see that much room on his frame to get much bigger.

One guy who comes to mind with Olynyk is Rashard Lewis.  Younger Lewis was much more athletic, which made him a more dangerous player, but as he got older, I think he ended up right around where Kelly will be.  Really a true stretch 4.  Can do a little of everything, but his biggest weapon is his shot.  He doesn't have the strength to play in the post regularly, but he has the skills to go down there against certain matchups and do some damage.

Right now, Olynyk's best skill is definitely passing and how well he moves on the floor.  He can shoot too but if you aren't picking a comparison who is a great passer then you're missing out on his best aspect, to me.

Not that it's a big deal just saying.  Hence my Vlade comparison.
"I really don't want people to understand me." - Jordan Crawford

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #155 on: November 13, 2013, 04:24:43 PM »

Offline erisred

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 650
  • Tommy Points: 37
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Yeah, I see Sully somewhere in the Scola mold.  I don't see that with Olynyk though.  I just think he is really skinny, and I don't see that much room on his frame to get much bigger.

One guy who comes to mind with Olynyk is Rashard Lewis.  Younger Lewis was much more athletic, which made him a more dangerous player, but as he got older, I think he ended up right around where Kelly will be.  Really a true stretch 4.  Can do a little of everything, but his biggest weapon is his shot.  He doesn't have the strength to play in the post regularly, but he has the skills to go down there against certain matchups and do some damage.

Right now, Olynyk's best skill is definitely passing and how well he moves on the floor.  He can shoot too but if you aren't picking a comparison who is a great passer then you're missing out on his best aspect, to me.

Not that it's a big deal just saying.  Hence my Vlade comparison.
And my Miller.  Miller was a very good passer out of the high post, fairly good jump shooter, fairly good rebounder, average defender, could go low post from time to time, but seemed to have the (unfair) rep of being a bit soft when battling in the paint. Miller stood 6'11" and weighed in at 245 lb. I think Kelly matches up pretty well with everything Miller could do, plus he has much better handles and potentially a better 3 pt shot...hence my thought he could turn out to be a rich man's Brad Miller. 

Hum, maybe you're right that does sound like Vlade, doesn't it? Fewer blocks, more points, though.

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #156 on: November 13, 2013, 04:32:45 PM »

Offline Snakehead

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6846
  • Tommy Points: 448

And my Miller.  Miller was a very good passer out of the high post, fairly good jump shooter, fairly good rebounder, average defender, could go low post from time to time, but seemed to have the (unfair) rep of being a bit soft when battling in the paint. Miller stood 6'11" and weighed in at 245 lb. I think Kelly matches up pretty well with everything Miller could do, plus he has much better handles and potentially a better 3 pt shot...hence my thought he could turn out to be a rich man's Brad Miller. 

Hum, maybe you're right that does sound like Vlade, doesn't it? Fewer blocks, more points, though.

Also he is just built more like Vlade.  But I totally see where you are coming from with Miller.

I do think Olynyk will be a bit more of a scorer but just how moves and passes he reminds me of Vlade.  Depends on the teams he is on I guess.  When Vlade was playing on the Kings they had alot of guys who could score so he wasn't being asked to score as much.  Olynyk could be the same way.
"I really don't want people to understand me." - Jordan Crawford

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #157 on: November 13, 2013, 04:35:31 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Yeah, I see Sully somewhere in the Scola mold.  I don't see that with Olynyk though.  I just think he is really skinny, and I don't see that much room on his frame to get much bigger.

One guy who comes to mind with Olynyk is Rashard Lewis.  Younger Lewis was much more athletic, which made him a more dangerous player, but as he got older, I think he ended up right around where Kelly will be.  Really a true stretch 4.  Can do a little of everything, but his biggest weapon is his shot.  He doesn't have the strength to play in the post regularly, but he has the skills to go down there against certain matchups and do some damage.

Right now, Olynyk's best skill is definitely passing and how well he moves on the floor.  He can shoot too but if you aren't picking a comparison who is a great passer then you're missing out on his best aspect, to me.

Not that it's a big deal just saying.  Hence my Vlade comparison.
And my Miller.  Miller was a very good passer out of the high post, fairly good jump shooter, fairly good rebounder, average defender, could go low post from time to time, but seemed to have the (unfair) rep of being a bit soft when battling in the paint. Miller stood 6'11" and weighed in at 245 lb. I think Kelly matches up pretty well with everything Miller could do, plus he has much better handles and potentially a better 3 pt shot...hence my thought he could turn out to be a rich man's Brad Miller. 

Hum, maybe you're right that does sound like Vlade, doesn't it? Fewer blocks, more points, though.

Miller was a BANGER though.  He made his name in Sacramento as a passer from the high post, but what made him such an effective player was his physicality and his rebounding to go along with that midrange shot and passing ability. 

I just don't see Olynyk ever being able to be that kind of physical presense. 

Also, I would be shocked if he was a "rich man's" Brad Miller.  That is VERY high expectations.  I think people tend to forget that he was one of the best centers in the league for a number of years for Indy and Sacramento. 

The Vlade comparison is interesting too, but again, he was such a strong player...at least older Vlade.  Younger Vlade wasn't as strong, but he was also in an NBA that wasn't nearly as strong and athletic.  A lot of his effectiveness came from how well he could hold his spot in the post, and then pass out of it. 

I just think Olynyk is a much more mobile player than both of those guys...because he has to be.  Those guys were able to be successful as relatively stationary offensive players.  I just don't see that with Olynyk.  He is something who I think you will see coming off screens, and working hard to get open, because he just won't be able to get the spot he wants otherwise. 

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #158 on: November 13, 2013, 07:36:57 PM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15247
  • Tommy Points: 1034
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Yeah, I see Sully somewhere in the Scola mold.  I don't see that with Olynyk though.  I just think he is really skinny, and I don't see that much room on his frame to get much bigger.

One guy who comes to mind with Olynyk is Rashard Lewis.  Younger Lewis was much more athletic, which made him a more dangerous player, but as he got older, I think he ended up right around where Kelly will be.  Really a true stretch 4.  Can do a little of everything, but his biggest weapon is his shot.  He doesn't have the strength to play in the post regularly, but he has the skills to go down there against certain matchups and do some damage.

Right now, Olynyk's best skill is definitely passing and how well he moves on the floor.  He can shoot too but if you aren't picking a comparison who is a great passer then you're missing out on his best aspect, to me.

Not that it's a big deal just saying.  Hence my Vlade comparison.
And my Miller.  Miller was a very good passer out of the high post, fairly good jump shooter, fairly good rebounder, average defender, could go low post from time to time, but seemed to have the (unfair) rep of being a bit soft when battling in the paint. Miller stood 6'11" and weighed in at 245 lb. I think Kelly matches up pretty well with everything Miller could do, plus he has much better handles and potentially a better 3 pt shot...hence my thought he could turn out to be a rich man's Brad Miller. 

Hum, maybe you're right that does sound like Vlade, doesn't it? Fewer blocks, more points, though.

Miller was a BANGER though.  He made his name in Sacramento as a passer from the high post, but what made him such an effective player was his physicality and his rebounding to go along with that midrange shot and passing ability. 

I just don't see Olynyk ever being able to be that kind of physical presense. 

Also, I would be shocked if he was a "rich man's" Brad Miller.  That is VERY high expectations.  I think people tend to forget that he was one of the best centers in the league for a number of years for Indy and Sacramento. 

The Vlade comparison is interesting too, but again, he was such a strong player...at least older Vlade.  Younger Vlade wasn't as strong, but he was also in an NBA that wasn't nearly as strong and athletic.  A lot of his effectiveness came from how well he could hold his spot in the post, and then pass out of it. 

I just think Olynyk is a much more mobile player than both of those guys...because he has to be.  Those guys were able to be successful as relatively stationary offensive players.  I just don't see that with Olynyk.  He is something who I think you will see coming off screens, and working hard to get open, because he just won't be able to get the spot he wants otherwise.
I would suggest more like Tony Kukoc. A big with scoring ability but can do a bit of everything well.  Not particularly tough down low, but a very good rebounder. 

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #159 on: November 13, 2013, 07:58:20 PM »

Offline jambr380

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13770
  • Tommy Points: 2061
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Yeah, I see Sully somewhere in the Scola mold.  I don't see that with Olynyk though.  I just think he is really skinny, and I don't see that much room on his frame to get much bigger.

One guy who comes to mind with Olynyk is Rashard Lewis.  Younger Lewis was much more athletic, which made him a more dangerous player, but as he got older, I think he ended up right around where Kelly will be.  Really a true stretch 4.  Can do a little of everything, but his biggest weapon is his shot.  He doesn't have the strength to play in the post regularly, but he has the skills to go down there against certain matchups and do some damage.

Right now, Olynyk's best skill is definitely passing and how well he moves on the floor.  He can shoot too but if you aren't picking a comparison who is a great passer then you're missing out on his best aspect, to me.

Not that it's a big deal just saying.  Hence my Vlade comparison.
And my Miller.  Miller was a very good passer out of the high post, fairly good jump shooter, fairly good rebounder, average defender, could go low post from time to time, but seemed to have the (unfair) rep of being a bit soft when battling in the paint. Miller stood 6'11" and weighed in at 245 lb. I think Kelly matches up pretty well with everything Miller could do, plus he has much better handles and potentially a better 3 pt shot...hence my thought he could turn out to be a rich man's Brad Miller. 

Hum, maybe you're right that does sound like Vlade, doesn't it? Fewer blocks, more points, though.

Miller was a BANGER though.  He made his name in Sacramento as a passer from the high post, but what made him such an effective player was his physicality and his rebounding to go along with that midrange shot and passing ability. 

I just don't see Olynyk ever being able to be that kind of physical presense. 

Also, I would be shocked if he was a "rich man's" Brad Miller.  That is VERY high expectations.  I think people tend to forget that he was one of the best centers in the league for a number of years for Indy and Sacramento. 

The Vlade comparison is interesting too, but again, he was such a strong player...at least older Vlade.  Younger Vlade wasn't as strong, but he was also in an NBA that wasn't nearly as strong and athletic.  A lot of his effectiveness came from how well he could hold his spot in the post, and then pass out of it. 

I just think Olynyk is a much more mobile player than both of those guys...because he has to be.  Those guys were able to be successful as relatively stationary offensive players.  I just don't see that with Olynyk.  He is something who I think you will see coming off screens, and working hard to get open, because he just won't be able to get the spot he wants otherwise.
I would suggest more like Tony Kukoc. A big with scoring ability but can do a bit of everything well.  Not particularly tough down low, but a very good rebounder.

TP for the Kukoc comparison. That is one I haven't heard before, but actually seems to make a lot of sense.

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #160 on: November 14, 2013, 09:23:21 AM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Good pts. Ive mentioned before olynyks game resembles millers game. High post, passing, drive to the net and finish(olynyk will be able to do morr once he gains experience and strength). Rebounding will also get better.

Not sure about sullinger = post injury webber. PI webber had a tendency to stick around the high post too much, playing more like a sf.  Sullinger on the other hand thrives at playing the physical under the basket game. For me anthony mason resemblence keeps coming to mind

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #161 on: November 14, 2013, 03:50:48 PM »

Offline Robert24

  • Lonnie Walker IV
  • Posts: 63
  • Tommy Points: 6
What about a current Carlos Boozer comparison for Sully?

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #162 on: November 14, 2013, 07:16:06 PM »

Offline mmmmm

  • NCE
  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5308
  • Tommy Points: 862
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Yeah, I see Sully somewhere in the Scola mold.  I don't see that with Olynyk though.  I just think he is really skinny, and I don't see that much room on his frame to get much bigger.

One guy who comes to mind with Olynyk is Rashard Lewis.  Younger Lewis was much more athletic, which made him a more dangerous player, but as he got older, I think he ended up right around where Kelly will be.  Really a true stretch 4.  Can do a little of everything, but his biggest weapon is his shot.  He doesn't have the strength to play in the post regularly, but he has the skills to go down there against certain matchups and do some damage.

Right now, Olynyk's best skill is definitely passing and how well he moves on the floor.  He can shoot too but if you aren't picking a comparison who is a great passer then you're missing out on his best aspect, to me.

Not that it's a big deal just saying.  Hence my Vlade comparison.
And my Miller.  Miller was a very good passer out of the high post, fairly good jump shooter, fairly good rebounder, average defender, could go low post from time to time, but seemed to have the (unfair) rep of being a bit soft when battling in the paint. Miller stood 6'11" and weighed in at 245 lb. I think Kelly matches up pretty well with everything Miller could do, plus he has much better handles and potentially a better 3 pt shot...hence my thought he could turn out to be a rich man's Brad Miller. 

Hum, maybe you're right that does sound like Vlade, doesn't it? Fewer blocks, more points, though.

Miller was a BANGER though.  He made his name in Sacramento as a passer from the high post, but what made him such an effective player was his physicality and his rebounding to go along with that midrange shot and passing ability. 

I just don't see Olynyk ever being able to be that kind of physical presense. 

Also, I would be shocked if he was a "rich man's" Brad Miller.  That is VERY high expectations.  I think people tend to forget that he was one of the best centers in the league for a number of years for Indy and Sacramento. 

The Vlade comparison is interesting too, but again, he was such a strong player...at least older Vlade.  Younger Vlade wasn't as strong, but he was also in an NBA that wasn't nearly as strong and athletic.  A lot of his effectiveness came from how well he could hold his spot in the post, and then pass out of it. 

I just think Olynyk is a much more mobile player than both of those guys...because he has to be.  Those guys were able to be successful as relatively stationary offensive players.  I just don't see that with Olynyk.  He is something who I think you will see coming off screens, and working hard to get open, because he just won't be able to get the spot he wants otherwise.
I would suggest more like Tony Kukoc. A big with scoring ability but can do a bit of everything well.  Not particularly tough down low, but a very good rebounder.

TP for the Kukoc comparison. That is one I haven't heard before, but actually seems to make a lot of sense.

Kukoc is a good call.

I re-did the search that D.o.s did but instead of using "F", "F-C" & "C" as the filter, I just went with 6' 10" or taller.

In that search, Kukoc comes back as having averaged 5.3 assists in 1998-99.

Here are the other names (starting back in time and moving to the present):

Wilt (5 times)
Bill (twice)
Tom Boerwinkle
Sam Lacey (3 times)
Kareem (twice)
Walton
Jeff Ruland
Toni Kukoc
Lamar Odom (3 times)
KG (3 times)
Vlade Divac
Kevin Love

Those are all the players 6' 10" or taller who averaged 5 assists per game or more since 1946 (though the earliest is Wilt back in '63-64).
NBA Officiating - Corrupt?  Incompetent?  Which is worse?  Does it matter?  It sucks.

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #163 on: November 15, 2013, 03:48:23 PM »

Offline mgent

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7567
  • Tommy Points: 1962
So this best passing big thing is a really interesting idea.

In the last 30 years, only 5 bigs (F-C) have averaged at least 5 assists a game.

Webber (twice)
Vlade
Schrempf
Jeff Ruland
And

Boris. Diaw.

http://bkref.com/tiny/fHGVb

I love saying the name Detlef Schrempf, and I loved watching him play, but he was no Big.

Yeah I was about to say.  Definitely a SF.

Nice list though.  Like I was saying, Olynyk reminds me of Vlade.
Vlade does come to mind, as does Scola, but so does Brad Miller. If he ends up more 5 than 4 he could end up being a rich man's Brad Miller...and that's really pretty good!

For Sullinger, West doesn't seem like a great comparison to me. In fact, Scola might be a better comparison for Sully than Kelly. Somebody mentioned post injury Chris Webber, and I think that might be a good comparison for Sullinger, too.

Yeah, I see Sully somewhere in the Scola mold.  I don't see that with Olynyk though.  I just think he is really skinny, and I don't see that much room on his frame to get much bigger.

One guy who comes to mind with Olynyk is Rashard Lewis.  Younger Lewis was much more athletic, which made him a more dangerous player, but as he got older, I think he ended up right around where Kelly will be.  Really a true stretch 4.  Can do a little of everything, but his biggest weapon is his shot.  He doesn't have the strength to play in the post regularly, but he has the skills to go down there against certain matchups and do some damage.
He's seems to be more of a pass-first-shoot-second player, that's not Lewis.  I've been saying Diaw since he was drafted.  Diaw's shooting/passing kept him in the league, but his athleticism disadvantage kept him from ever reaching his full potential.

Scola is what I've been saying for Sullinger's best-case.  David West is a pipe-dream, and if his back or other injuries hold him back Dejuan Blair is an unfortunate possibility.
Philly:

Anderson Varejao    Tiago Splitter    Matt Bonner
David West    Kenyon Martin    Brad Miller
Andre Iguodala    Josh Childress    Marquis Daniels
Dwyane Wade    Leandro Barbosa
Kirk Hinrich    Toney Douglas   + the legendary Kevin McHale

Re: Sullinger and Olynyk duo
« Reply #164 on: November 15, 2013, 07:23:02 PM »

Offline Snakehead

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6846
  • Tommy Points: 448
What about a current Carlos Boozer comparison for Sully?

I think he's already too good on defense for that one to be made  :P

But Boozer is a good offensive player and a strong rebounder.  If Sully gets there in those departments and can defend he would be outstanding.
"I really don't want people to understand me." - Jordan Crawford