Author Topic: Broussard: Doc Rivers believes it's time for a change in coaching status  (Read 14734 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 643
We don't know his reasons yet. What if he's not pressuring Ainge? What if he's trying to pressure KG into coming back and/or Pierce into taking less money? He could be hinting to them that if you decide that's it, then I'm outta here too, and it's your fault Rondo will end up p---ed off.

...Or he could just be messing with Gary Washburn.  Maybe Washburn texted him during dinner, and he was annoyed, so he responded that he doesn't want to talk about it.

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 643


It's the coach's job to turn undisciplined numbers into disciplined numbers.

You need a good coach to do that.

Very true.  And sometimes the way the coach does that is by not putting the undisciplined guy on the floor.

Offline Chief Macho

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1247
  • Tommy Points: 84
i wish the owners would step in and replace everybody. this team needs a new set of eyes on it.

Offline LooseCannon

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11833
  • Tommy Points: 950
McGee gets a lot of rebounds and blocks.

But his team gets beat on the boards worse when he's on the court and opponents shoot a higher percentage at the rim too.

Undisciplined numbers don't help you win games.

It's the coach's job to turn undisciplined numbers into disciplined numbers.

You need a good coach to do that.

You also need a coachable player.  Some players with obvious talent just won't amount to much no matter who coaches them.
"The worst thing that ever happened in sports was sports radio, and the internet is sports radio on steroids with lower IQs.” -- Brian Burke, former Toronto Maple Leafs senior adviser, at the 2013 MIT Sloan Sports Analytics Conference

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34137
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
McGee gets a lot of rebounds and blocks.

But his team gets beat on the boards worse when he's on the court and opponents shoot a higher percentage at the rim too.

Undisciplined numbers don't help you win games.

It's the coach's job to turn undisciplined numbers into disciplined numbers.

You need a good coach to do that.

You also need a coachable player.  Some players with obvious talent just won't amount to much no matter who coaches them.


And sometimes, the guy isn't smart enough to be coached. 

Offline scaryjerry

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3878
  • Tommy Points: 236
McGee gets a lot of rebounds and blocks.

But his team gets beat on the boards worse when he's on the court and opponents shoot a higher percentage at the rim too.

Undisciplined numbers don't help you win games.

It's the coach's job to turn undisciplined numbers into disciplined numbers.

You need a good coach to do that.


You are so out of line and frankly lost with your McGee argument. He was looking like a lost cause before he was coached by Karl...frankly the way he played in spurts under Karl was why he was overpaid...Karl was then completely in the right not to over play the knucklehead and knew it better then anyone, certainly you. George did a sensational job this season.

Offline Moranis

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 35167
  • Tommy Points: 1618
McGee gets a lot of rebounds and blocks.

But his team gets beat on the boards worse when he's on the court and opponents shoot a higher percentage at the rim too.

Undisciplined numbers don't help you win games.

It's the coach's job to turn undisciplined numbers into disciplined numbers.

You need a good coach to do that.


You are so out of line and frankly lost with your McGee argument. He was looking like a lost cause before he was coached by Karl...frankly the way he played in spurts under Karl was why he was overpaid...Karl was then completely in the right not to over play the knucklehead and knew it better then anyone, certainly you. George did a sensational job this season.
And the other thing is, he played Koufos only 22 minutes and Mozgov only 9 minutes a game.  All three of those guys were pretty similar rebounders, passers, and shooters.  McGee got a few more shots per game, but that was as much of who he played with than anything else.  I mean was Karl supposed to play Iguodala, Gallinari, or Faried less minutes. 
2025 Historical Draft - Cleveland Cavaliers - 1st pick

Starters - Luka, JB, Lebron, Wemby, Shaq
Rotation - D. Daniels, Mitchell, G. Wallace, Melo, Noah
Deep Bench - Korver, Turner

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
Here comes the tank, baby.  Rondo will miss most of the year, KG will retire.  Pierce will get bought out.  We'll win about 15 games.  Hire Vitaly Potapenko as coach just to ensure we're terrible.

Offline letsgoblue86

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3766
  • Tommy Points: 292
If Doc is out and Kidd doesn't get the gig in Brooklyn, how would everyone feel about hiring Kidd as coach?

Offline gar

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2629
  • Tommy Points: 247
  • Strength from Within
Agree with much that has been said. Doc is incapable of making the tough decisions that a Celtics coach would have to make with or without Pierce and KG. If they stay they need to have their roles redefined (not going to happen under Doc). If they go Doc is not going to be the one to motivate a Rondo centric team. Rondo is too cerebral and without the ability to feed off of KG's intensity will be hard to coach.

Hand it to Doc - smart guy - knows his own strengths and weaknesses. Great run, but time to move on.

Offline More Banners

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
This is all interesting, but truthfully I have no patience with it.

The difference between Larry Bird as GM and Danny is that Larry would have called Doc directly, asked if he was going to fill out his contract for next year or not, and if Doc was undecided, give him a short leash to figure it out and end the chatter in order to bring stability to the organization going into free agency.

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
This is all interesting, but truthfully I have no patience with it.

The difference between Larry Bird as GM and Danny is that Larry would have called Doc directly, asked if he was going to fill out his contract for next year or not, and if Doc was undecided, give him a short leash to figure it out and end the chatter in order to bring stability to the organization going into free agency.
Why are you so confident about how Bird would approach this situation?

"Larry Bird" feels like a proxy for how you would handle it.

Offline blink

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19703
  • Tommy Points: 1625
So for the last few years almost everyone on this board says that Broussard just basically makes up stuff to stay in the headlines.  Why does everyone automatically believe it is true?

I will be more concerned when someone like Woj or Jackie Mac starts reporting this. 

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
If Doc is out and Kidd doesn't get the gig in Brooklyn, how would everyone feel about hiring Kidd as coach?

No, thanks.  I don't like his personal history.

Offline More Banners

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
This is all interesting, but truthfully I have no patience with it.

The difference between Larry Bird as GM and Danny is that Larry would have called Doc directly, asked if he was going to fill out his contract for next year or not, and if Doc was undecided, give him a short leash to figure it out and end the chatter in order to bring stability to the organization going into free agency.
Why are you so confident about how Bird would approach this situation?

"Larry Bird" feels like a proxy for how you would handle it.

Bird has a pretty clear track record of handling personnel issues in Indy.  He's been interviewed quite a lot on GMish topics, and has been incredibly consistent, in terms of temperament, forever.

He also fired his best friend when it needed to be done.

There's no BS with Bird.  This uncertainty whether someone under contract "feels like" coming back would be something I would expect Bird as a manager to get resolved quickly, one way or the other.