Do people even look at the boxscores. Watching the game is one thing, but when you take a look at the teams they beat, the players who performed and the record. Then compare it to the beginning of the season, you will start to see the real reason why that 20-8 was overrated.
In the playoffs when he was on the court we also played a lot better than without him.
That was against Hawks/76ers squads who pushed the C's to 6/7 games respectively.
I don't think it was overrated, it was a great stretch of high level play. That doesn't mean he'll be able to do it again, or for a whole season.
One of the reasons fans rave about is the 20-8 record......
when you look at it more in depth you see a lot of bad teams with the exception of Miami.
Then you look more into it and you see lots of good games by Garnett and Pierce.
These guys were almost worthless at the start of the season. Garnett failed to attempt a free throw in his first few games.
Pierce was shooting 30% in the first 20 games.
It was awful. And who gets the blame? Ray Allen ultimately gets the blame as he was benched.
Now do I think the Bradley starting experiment is a failure? NO, I think him starting and Ray coming off the bench was pretty good for the team. But I also think it would not matter if he didnt start either, as I still think Ray can play, and not get compared to Steve Novak and Shane Battier as most of the board thinks.