0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
I have Pierce at the 2 (at least at the moment) and I'd take him over Finley and just because he is on my team. http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=piercpa01&p2=finlemi01 From 2000-2004, Pierce was a bit better than Finley (and they were matched up against each other a lot).
Quote from: Moranis on June 03, 2012, 11:35:50 AMI have Pierce at the 2 (at least at the moment) and I'd take him over Finley and just because he is on my team. http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=piercpa01&p2=finlemi01 From 2000-2004, Pierce was a bit better than Finley (and they were matched up against each other a lot).I think you have an issue taking the non championship pierce, that gives your starting 4 as of now only one champion and thats this guy.
Quote from: Rondo2287 on June 04, 2012, 07:13:58 AMQuote from: Moranis on June 03, 2012, 11:35:50 AMI have Pierce at the 2 (at least at the moment) and I'd take him over Finley and just because he is on my team. http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=piercpa01&p2=finlemi01 From 2000-2004, Pierce was a bit better than Finley (and they were matched up against each other a lot).I think you have an issue taking the non championship pierce, that gives your starting 4 as of now only one champion and thats this guy.I'm using Bynum from this season. He was way too raw during the title runs.BTW, a lot of the teams do not have a title season from any player.
So I think I've just about talked myself into delusion about Finley. I have come to the conclusion that aside from Kobe, mcgrady and Wade, I'm not sure I'm weaker at the 2 against anyone. Finley was just an absolute monster in his prime, and stacks up better than some as a complete player, and at least a peer with the rest. Thoughts?
I wouldn't take 2008 Pierce. I thought he was at his best in those 2000-2002 and 2004-2006 stretches. I'd pick one of those seasons. I have no issues with his mentality or experience as a younger player. Pierce was a thoroughbred. Always able to play the game the right way. A genuine winner. I don't think he'll have any difficulty adapting to the role asked of him on that loaded Dallas team.
I may be a little late, so please don't skip me until my time expires. Thanks.
Quote from: Moranis on June 04, 2012, 08:14:28 AMQuote from: Rondo2287 on June 04, 2012, 07:13:58 AMQuote from: Moranis on June 03, 2012, 11:35:50 AMI have Pierce at the 2 (at least at the moment) and I'd take him over Finley and just because he is on my team. http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/h2h_finder.cgi?request=1&p1=piercpa01&p2=finlemi01 From 2000-2004, Pierce was a bit better than Finley (and they were matched up against each other a lot).I think you have an issue taking the non championship pierce, that gives your starting 4 as of now only one champion and thats this guy.I'm using Bynum from this season. He was way too raw during the title runs.BTW, a lot of the teams do not have a title season from any player.Im not talking about title season im talking about guys that won. Pierce in 2002 while more impressive physically was not the all around player that he was in 07-08. If you use the 02 Pierce you will only have one player on a championship winner and that guy as we have seen is inconsistant.