I'll admit, I was kind of on the "dang it Doc, play the rookies" train. I even called him a bad coach. Doc is part of the reason why we're fighting now through all those injuries...
I concede that I was wrong on Doc...except for the Jermaine O'Neal part. I still maintain that JO sucked.
JO sucked, JO sucked, JO sucked.
He contributed as much as Hollins. Maybe even less.
Sure he was not an offensive threat. But seriously? An NBA player who can't finish gimmies?
You argue that he was the best defensive big we had... I think it was Joakim Noah, strictly an energy and utility big who can't create at all (albeit an elite one at that), dribbled right past our "best defensive big" and slammed it in one of the sad Bulls losses. He couldn't even foul hard enough to intimidate (was it me or did he allow quite a few and ones?). He failed at being 250 pounds of mass...
The worst part was the intangibles (for the lack of a better term). He wasn't exactly as bad as Blatche or Baron Davis, he tried definitely. The problem is he sucked so much of the energy off everyone. I'm surprised he even managed 15-20 a game. He looked like hell. When Wilcox filled in for him, the team had a whole different complexity.
So...why the hell did Doc play him so much? It's so strange... Could it be orders from the top telling Doc to squeeze every last penny's worth out of JO? Or is it just me who saw JO as such a gigantic, ugly problem?