Probably playing about the same, with George having a slightly hihger upside.
Fair enough. Then, his name has no business amongst the likes of Rudy Gay, Danilo and Wallace.
That's equivalent of ranking Avery Bradley a Top 10 SG as, indeed, he fit in here as well as Leonard did in Spurs.
George is listed as an SG, but I would rate them similarly in terms of trade value. Again, this is trade value, which can be very different from current production.
The Spurs are very high on Leonard. If not for their strong interest in winning now, I can't see any reason why they'd trade him for Pierce.
http://espn.go.com/blog/truehoop/post/_/id/40448/what-makes-kawhi-leonard-so-good
Bradley is not on that level yet. Are you saying we could trade him for Paul George?
Actually, I don't think Spurs would trade him at this point. It's more of a question what Leonard means for other teams.
He's really valuable to the Spurs, but not that valuable to the rest of the league. This is the reason I drew that comparison to Avery Bradley.
Indiana won't be trading Paul George for Leonard, either.
But, if, by trade value, we also include how much a player's current team sticks to the respective player, then, I think I got your reasoning.