Bucher now says "League official says NBDL rule, along w/20-yr age limit + offseason drug testing are B-List and not take-it-or-leave-it. BRI/tax rules are."
Not sure what that means; I doubt it's like the players can just Sharpie it out and then do the deal.
That makes more sense. Basically, those are part of the 30 or so things that still need to be negotiated, if the players accept the rest of the deal.
My guess is the owners just threw it in there as a starting point.
I think its also important to remember that the players (or owners) can't take an official vote until the entire deal is finished and in stone. The players are basically just going to discuss on Monday/Tuesday whether they can make a handshake agreement on the major issues, in order to move on to the small stuff.
That's a pretty messed up starting point. Its basically saying 'If you're not gonna have a 10+ year career, enjoy coaching that high school boys team when you're 31.'
Well, they have to start somewhere. That way they have something to give up, so they can get the ones they want.
The bottom line here is that right now it is a non-issue...and Bucher is a terrible reporter.
What?
The initial demands do matter, especially when they effect the player's willingness to accept a deal.
Not a non-story at all. The owners got the players to conceed on the BRI to 50 and now are trying to anchor the system issues to the point where the players aren't going to get anything close to the system issue concessions they were seeking.
If you think its a non-story the players should throw out a similar non-story to start things off. No max salary, no cap, and free puppies for everyone on the roster on opening day.