I mean assuming full health do people think Bogut is a huge upgrade over Kaman? They're almost the same player to me.
Really? Even fully healthy, I don't think that Kaman is 1/4 the defensive player that Bogut is.
Not to mention that when both are healthy Kaman isn't even that much better of an offensive player. Not by nearly a big enough margin to make up the gap on the other end of the floor.
Looking at 2009-10. The last season both were at their healthiest and also the best season either ever had career wise.
Bogut 15.9 pts, 2.5 blks, 10.1 boards, 63% free throw, 52% Field Goal
Kaman 18.5 pts, 1.2 blks, 9.2 boards, 75% free throw, 49% Field Goal
Fully healthy Bogut had the edge on the boards and protecting the rim, but Kaman was the better offensive player overall when you factor in free throws. I think in as close a series as this will be that must be factored in because you will be more hesitant to put the ball in a bad free throw shooter's hands at the end of games.
I just don't see a Huge advantage here. I would want Bogut more but if I missed on him and had to settle for Kaman I wouldn't go crazy.
They're both slow, unathletic 7 footers who shoot with either hand and have very good footwork. Their PERs are very similar and neither is the second best player on a title team. Only thing is, is that Kaman is the third best player on his team while Bogut is the second best.