I don't think your team is separated from the pack, a good collection of talent but I'm not sure if a somewhat upgraded Grizzilies roster is the stuff of a champion.
That's kind of my thought, as well. Very talented, and I like the majority of the individual pieces. However, a very similar team (although not quite as good as thing one) was an 8th seed in a watered down 30 team NBA. I don't think an upgraded version of that team would be a contender in a 24 team contracted CB-NBA.
Good team, though, and very entertaining to watch.
Obviously, I disagree.
I think the difference between Parker, Lee/George and Rudy is significantly better than Conley Jr., TA/Mayo and Battier.
Well, you can't count Gay on one side of the ledger, and leave him off on the other. When Rudy went down, the Grizzlies weren't exactly burning up the NBA. In fact, arguably they were better without him.
Let's compare lineups:
Gasol vs. Gasol - Wash
Randolph vs. Randolph - Wash
Gay vs. Gay - Wash
Tony vs. Lee -- Advantage Real Griz
Conley vs. Parker - Advantage Fake Griz
Battier vs. Artest - Advantage Real Griz
_______ vs. George - Wash / slight edge to Fake Griz
_______ vs. Hayes - Wash / slight edge to Fake Griz
Mayo vs. ? - TBD
Now, Battier and Gay never played together, so that might not be a fair comparison, but I don't see your current team as a huge improvement either version of the real Griz (with or without Rudy).
We were afraid owners would think this, but we think that this is putting the TA/Mayo issue on one side of the ledger and leaving it off the other.
Conley-Tony-Gay-ZBo-Gasol was not a lineup the Grizz had for long (and when they did, just before Gay went down, they were something 11-3 I believe SO said). If you want to compare us to the lineup above and even say we are roughly equal, then we outta be roughly equal to an 11-3 team. I do acknowledge that is a small sample size, though, so, I think the more accurate comparisons need to be made are our Pawnee Pacers to either the regular season grizz (with Conley-Mayo-Gay-ZBo-Gasol) or to the playoff grizz with (Conley-TA-Batter-ZBo-Gasol).
If you compare us to the reg season Grizzlies, I think it's difficult because there was clearly some bad chemistry in that lineup which caused their record to be .500ish. There is no other explanation to how that lineup could be far more talented than the playoff Grizzlies, but underperform. So, I conclude that either Mayo or Gay was a bad chemistry fit in that starting lineup which is why the team had better success when inserting less talented players as starters. I won't impose anything on you and will let you make your own decisions on who you believe the poor chemistry fit was.
So, I honestly think the most accurate comparison to make is the Pawnee Pacers to the playoff Grizzles. I think that our team is superior at 2 positions, the same at 2, and I think C. Lee provides good defense like Tony, but a different dynamic offensively by spreading the floor allowing Parker to drive and our bigs to work down low.