Author Topic: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal  (Read 2980 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #30 on: Yesterday at 08:14:00 AM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9103
  • Tommy Points: 1219
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #31 on: Yesterday at 09:06:05 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15378
  • Tommy Points: 1119
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

I believe that Conley is fully guaranteed.  I think all 14 contracts are now guaranteed.  BOS can waive someone if they want but their full contract would count against the cap/tax/aprons, plus whoever they sign to replace them.

I actually don't like either (Beal or Conley) all that much.  I get that Conley is on a min but I am not so sure we get much out of him.  Emergency use PG, a role for which I guess he will be fine.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #32 on: Yesterday at 09:23:49 AM »

Offline Celtics2021

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9103
  • Tommy Points: 1219
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

I believe that Conley is fully guaranteed.  I think all 14 contracts are now guaranteed.  BOS can waive someone if they want but their full contract would count against the cap/tax/aprons, plus whoever they sign to replace them.

I actually don't like either (Beal or Conley) all that much.  I get that Conley is on a min but I am not so sure we get much out of him.  Emergency use PG, a role for which I guess he will be fine.

Walsh remains non-guaranteed, but otherwise you are correct.

I do not think Conley is great, but I would rather have him as a 3rd PG than a lot of the other options.  That said, I would love to figure out how to trade Sam Hauser for Davion Mitchell or Ty Jerome.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #33 on: Yesterday at 09:50:13 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15378
  • Tommy Points: 1119
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

I believe that Conley is fully guaranteed.  I think all 14 contracts are now guaranteed.  BOS can waive someone if they want but their full contract would count against the cap/tax/aprons, plus whoever they sign to replace them.

I actually don't like either (Beal or Conley) all that much.  I get that Conley is on a min but I am not so sure we get much out of him.  Emergency use PG, a role for which I guess he will be fine.

Walsh remains non-guaranteed, but otherwise you are correct.

I do not think Conley is great, but I would rather have him as a 3rd PG than a lot of the other options.  That said, I would love to figure out how to trade Sam Hauser for Davion Mitchell or Ty Jerome.

OK, yes, Walsh is still non-guaranteed.  Spotrac is not listing the salaries quite the same on the team pages.  It seems it used to be more clear when a salary was not guaranteed.

Quote
2025-26: $200,000 guaranteed, 50% guaranteed Opening Night, fully guaranteed 1/10/26

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #34 on: Yesterday at 11:22:29 AM »

Offline Jiri Welsch

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3362
  • Tommy Points: 399
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

I believe that Conley is fully guaranteed.  I think all 14 contracts are now guaranteed.  BOS can waive someone if they want but their full contract would count against the cap/tax/aprons, plus whoever they sign to replace them.

I actually don't like either (Beal or Conley) all that much.  I get that Conley is on a min but I am not so sure we get much out of him.  Emergency use PG, a role for which I guess he will be fine.

Walsh remains non-guaranteed, but otherwise you are correct.

I do not think Conley is great, but I would rather have him as a 3rd PG than a lot of the other options.  That said, I would love to figure out how to trade Sam Hauser for Davion Mitchell or Ty Jerome.

OK, yes, Walsh is still non-guaranteed.  Spotrac is not listing the salaries quite the same on the team pages.  It seems it used to be more clear when a salary was not guaranteed.

Quote
2025-26: $200,000 guaranteed, 50% guaranteed Opening Night, fully guaranteed 1/10/26

Interesting. Keith Smith tweeted the other day that Jordan Walsh's contract had become guaranteed.

https://x.com/KeithSmithNBA/status/2079196667216048578

Quote
Keith Smith @KeithSmithNBA

Jordan Walsh's contact with the Boston Celtics becomes fully guaranteed for $2.4M today.

Walsh will be extension-eligible throughout the balance of the season. He can extend for up to 140% of the average player salary, which would start at $21.2M per season.
1:28 PM ? Jul 20, 2026

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #35 on: Yesterday at 11:32:13 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15378
  • Tommy Points: 1119
Just reported that Walsh did sign an extension and BOS did pick up all the guarantees on the current contract.  So NOW, all 14 contracts are guaranteed.
« Last Edit: Today at 02:19:21 PM by Vermont Green »

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #36 on: Today at 12:31:05 PM »

Offline tonydelk

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2236
  • Tommy Points: 526
The C's need more fire power off their bench.  Hopefully Beal is an option.  They can trade one of Luka Garza, Harper or Conley at the Trade Deadline to get under.  They can also trade Hauser and take back less salary as well to work.  Having 15 players and being a bit over the tax is not the end of the world when they have some 2nd round pick ammo to work with.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #37 on: Today at 01:42:52 PM »

Online Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10714
  • Tommy Points: 479
James to Sixers so will Beal head to Miami for more playing time than in Boston?
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin