Author Topic: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal  (Read 1840 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #30 on: Today at 08:14:00 AM »

Online Celtics2021

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9091
  • Tommy Points: 1219
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #31 on: Today at 09:06:05 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15363
  • Tommy Points: 1119
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

I believe that Conley is fully guaranteed.  I think all 14 contracts are now guaranteed.  BOS can waive someone if they want but their full contract would count against the cap/tax/aprons, plus whoever they sign to replace them.

I actually don't like either (Beal or Conley) all that much.  I get that Conley is on a min but I am not so sure we get much out of him.  Emergency use PG, a role for which I guess he will be fine.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #32 on: Today at 09:23:49 AM »

Online Celtics2021

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9091
  • Tommy Points: 1219
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

I believe that Conley is fully guaranteed.  I think all 14 contracts are now guaranteed.  BOS can waive someone if they want but their full contract would count against the cap/tax/aprons, plus whoever they sign to replace them.

I actually don't like either (Beal or Conley) all that much.  I get that Conley is on a min but I am not so sure we get much out of him.  Emergency use PG, a role for which I guess he will be fine.

Walsh remains non-guaranteed, but otherwise you are correct.

I do not think Conley is great, but I would rather have him as a 3rd PG than a lot of the other options.  That said, I would love to figure out how to trade Sam Hauser for Davion Mitchell or Ty Jerome.

Re: C's are potential landing spot for Bradley Beal
« Reply #33 on: Today at 09:50:13 AM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15363
  • Tommy Points: 1119
Waving Conley probably will happen if signing Beal. So who u rather have?

Uh, no it will not.

I believe that Conley is fully guaranteed.  I think all 14 contracts are now guaranteed.  BOS can waive someone if they want but their full contract would count against the cap/tax/aprons, plus whoever they sign to replace them.

I actually don't like either (Beal or Conley) all that much.  I get that Conley is on a min but I am not so sure we get much out of him.  Emergency use PG, a role for which I guess he will be fine.

Walsh remains non-guaranteed, but otherwise you are correct.

I do not think Conley is great, but I would rather have him as a 3rd PG than a lot of the other options.  That said, I would love to figure out how to trade Sam Hauser for Davion Mitchell or Ty Jerome.

OK, yes, Walsh is still non-guaranteed.  Spotrac is not listing the salaries quite the same on the team pages.  It seems it used to be more clear when a salary was not guaranteed.

Quote
2025-26: $200,000 guaranteed, 50% guaranteed Opening Night, fully guaranteed 1/10/26