The mathematician in me says "cmon.....he was good for a long time, then not so good for a little while. He's probably good, but just a little lost"
The viewer in me says "A little lost? Dude! Mine eyes hath seen "LOST" and it is Jeff Green. Do you see him out there? Are there stats for that? Look at that! That is lost! I mean he needs a mirror to touch his nose and I think he's sober. I mean does he even know what sport this is?"
I am scared and I'm not sure what's going on
Unfortunately, not only does he now look "lost," in boston he was EXACTLY the same player as in OKC: He was Never that good. He just played more minutes (he was on pace for 17th in minutes per game pre-trade), and thus his numbers creeped toward respectability, enough that people were fooled by the volume totals (much like Davis as a starter: it simply takes these guys far too long to get even decent looking numbers, numbers that are actually not that good when you realize how many minutes they play; good players either get such numbers in significantly less time or are able to put up significantly better numbers with huge minutes like Green's).
For example, it's easy to say Green went from 15.2/5.6/1.8 to 9.8/3.3/.7 and think he got worse. Unfortunately, this ignores the fact he just dropped from 37 mpg to 23.5.
So look at his per 36 minute numbers:
OKC: 14.8/5.4/1.8 with .8 stl, .4 blk, 1.5 to's on .437/.304/.818 shooting.
Boston: 14.9/5.1/1.1 with .8 stl, .8 blk, 1.4 to's on .485/.296/.794 shooting.
That is incredibly similar!
So unfortunately, it appears that this is who he is. He's been remarkably similar his whole career; he's almost exactly average across the board. Which is nice to have off the bench for sub-MLE money, but i think Green thinks he deserves much much more, simply because he has an overinflated reputation based on draft night position 4 years ago.