I'd take Dennis Rodman over Ben Wallace ten times out of ten.
If you're talking about at the FT line.
Defensively I've always seen them on the same level, but 100 levels above everyone else. Too hard to compare them in different eras. What makes you say Rodman is the automatic winner?
Rodman was far more versatile a defender especially early on in Detroit. He would guard a SG one possession and the next would be guarding a C. His range defensively was incredible and frankly unmatched in NBA history. He is also by far the best rebounder in NBA history (when pace and league average is accounted for). Wallace is essentially a poor mans Dennis Rodman.
But I'm not sure if Rodman could slow down Shaq or Wilt. At 6'7" and about 210, he was 2" shorter and 30 pounds lighter than Ben.
Ben works great for me vs the Shaqs and Wilts. If Ben stymied Shaq back in the early 2000's then I have faith that he could slow him down for this draft.
There is video of Rodman guarding Shaq. He actually held his own quite well against him.
Yeah, no doubt...but those extra 2" inches and 30 pounds goes a long way.
I guess Rodman was called "The Worm"....Ben is called, well..."Big Ben." Nick had a need for Dennis, and I had a need for Ben.
Either way, Lebron's going to have issues driving the paint. He may get past Magic, Jerry, Rodman or my backcourt, but then he will waltz (Travel?, j/k) into the waiting arms of Walton, Reed, Kareem, Ben, or KG.
That is (IMO) Lebron's only issue I see, even in real life - and that is finishing in the paint. I could very well be proven wrong (DAL has Tyson and Haywood), and if I am I'll come back and revisit this.