Author Topic: Perkins would not have helped here  (Read 22444 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Perkins would not have helped here
« on: May 11, 2011, 10:28:42 PM »

Offline rl8373a

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 16
  • Tommy Points: 1
I'm sorry but I am going to go out and say it Kendrick Perkins would not have helped here.  Niether would any of the other players that we traded.

Perkins was only effective against two teams, the Magic and the Lakers.  Any center put with the big 4 could put up the numbers that Perkins did offensively and JO did just as well as him defensively.

The reason for the trade was that we needed somebody to back up pierce and that is what we got.  Besides the occasional lapses I believe Green played really well especially on defense.  If anything the problem was that he did not get to play with the big 4. 

I believe Doc is a great coach but if you talk about a reason for making a trade and then never go with why even mention it.  Green needed davis' minutes from the time he came over in the trade.

Overall I am disappointed but I am still happy to be a celtics fan.  I don't think any team in the NBA had as many injuries over the course of the season and during the playoffs as us and I believe that the team played with heart and pride anyways.

4 years, 1 title and 3 what if injuries...I am not jumping for joy but after that 06-07 season I will definitely take it

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #1 on: May 11, 2011, 10:31:23 PM »

Offline Celticsfan336

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 397
  • Tommy Points: 44
exactly

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #2 on: May 11, 2011, 10:33:14 PM »

Offline SHAQATTACK

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37808
  • Tommy Points: 3030
I like Perk alot.

Take that back...he would have helped ..yes....but not enough m diff for a win in this series ...,  the Heat was just too much and too many healthy young legs and bodies. 

Now a 25yr old PP and KG .....thats another story.

« Last Edit: May 11, 2011, 10:42:13 PM by SHAQATTACK »

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #3 on: May 11, 2011, 10:35:33 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
I'm sorry but I am going to go out and say it Kendrick Perkins would not have helped here.  Niether would any of the other players that we traded.

Perkins was only effective against two teams, the Magic and the Lakers.  Any center put with the big 4 could put up the numbers that Perkins did offensively and JO did just as well as him defensively.

The reason for the trade was that we needed somebody to back up pierce and that is what we got.  Besides the occasional lapses I believe Green played really well especially on defense.  If anything the problem was that he did not get to play with the big 4. 

I believe Doc is a great coach but if you talk about a reason for making a trade and then never go with why even mention it.  Green needed davis' minutes from the time he came over in the trade.

Overall I am disappointed but I am still happy to be a celtics fan.  I don't think any team in the NBA had as many injuries over the course of the season and during the playoffs as us and I believe that the team played with heart and pride anyways.

4 years, 1 title and 3 what if injuries...I am not jumping for joy but after that 06-07 season I will definitely take it

well I just listened to Ray Allen's postgame comments and he said we lost because of too much interior scoring.

Wade and LeBron drove to the basket without fear and that is directly related to our interior defense being weakened. The defensive rotations were slow, not strong, and sometimes non-existent...

so, how exactly can you conclude that Perk would not have helped?

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #4 on: May 11, 2011, 10:37:02 PM »

Offline RJ87

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11954
  • Tommy Points: 1431
  • Let's Go Celtics!
Perk would've meant less of BBD at the 5. Just sayin'....
2021 Houston Rockets
PG: Kyrie Irving/Patty Mills/Jalen Brunson
SG: OG Anunoby/Norman Powell/Matisse Thybulle
SF: Gordon Hayward/Demar Derozan
PF: Giannis Antetokounmpo/Robert Covington
C: Kristaps Porzingis/Bobby Portis/James Wiseman

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #5 on: May 11, 2011, 10:38:15 PM »

Offline Marcus13

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2578
  • Tommy Points: 119
I disagree, he would have helped our pathetic help defense and limited BBD's minutes.

Not saying we would have won, but he would have helped

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #6 on: May 11, 2011, 10:39:08 PM »

Offline LB3533

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4088
  • Tommy Points: 315
If Perk were here it would be more FTs for the Heat and Perk on the bench.

So in effect, Perk wouldn't be playing for us anyway.

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #7 on: May 11, 2011, 10:40:02 PM »

Offline rl8373a

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 16
  • Tommy Points: 1
I'm sorry but I am going to go out and say it Kendrick Perkins would not have helped here.  Niether would any of the other players that we traded.

Perkins was only effective against two teams, the Magic and the Lakers.  Any center put with the big 4 could put up the numbers that Perkins did offensively and JO did just as well as him defensively.

The reason for the trade was that we needed somebody to back up pierce and that is what we got.  Besides the occasional lapses I believe Green played really well especially on defense.  If anything the problem was that he did not get to play with the big 4. 

I believe Doc is a great coach but if you talk about a reason for making a trade and then never go with why even mention it.  Green needed davis' minutes from the time he came over in the trade.

Overall I am disappointed but I am still happy to be a celtics fan.  I don't think any team in the NBA had as many injuries over the course of the season and during the playoffs as us and I believe that the team played with heart and pride anyways.

4 years, 1 title and 3 what if injuries...I am not jumping for joy but after that 06-07 season I will definitely take it

well I just listened to Ray Allen's postgame comments and he said we lost because of too much interior scoring.

Wade and LeBron drove to the basket without fear and that is directly related to our interior defense being weakened. The defensive rotations were slow, not strong, and sometimes non-existent...

so, how exactly can you conclude that Perk would not have helped?

Because Perkins was injured, he was slow on defense and still is slow on defense.  Perkins himself wasn't going to stop the drives wade or lebron.  Perkins was a good one-on-one defender against howard/bynum because he had KG as help.  

The way you stop interior scoring from the wings is by not letting them get to the basket

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #8 on: May 11, 2011, 10:40:36 PM »

Offline Jon

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6500
  • Tommy Points: 385
I'm sorry but I am going to go out and say it Kendrick Perkins would not have helped here.  Niether would any of the other players that we traded.

Perkins was only effective against two teams, the Magic and the Lakers.  Any center put with the big 4 could put up the numbers that Perkins did offensively and JO did just as well as him defensively.

The reason for the trade was that we needed somebody to back up pierce and that is what we got.  Besides the occasional lapses I believe Green played really well especially on defense.  If anything the problem was that he did not get to play with the big 4. 

I believe Doc is a great coach but if you talk about a reason for making a trade and then never go with why even mention it.  Green needed davis' minutes from the time he came over in the trade.

Overall I am disappointed but I am still happy to be a celtics fan.  I don't think any team in the NBA had as many injuries over the course of the season and during the playoffs as us and I believe that the team played with heart and pride anyways.

4 years, 1 title and 3 what if injuries...I am not jumping for joy but after that 06-07 season I will definitely take it

well I just listened to Ray Allen's postgame comments and he said we lost because of too much interior scoring.

Wade and LeBron drove to the basket without fear and that is directly related to our interior defense being weakened. The defensive rotations were slow, not strong, and sometimes non-existent...

so, how exactly can you conclude that Perk would not have helped?

We lost because Rondo was hurt, plain and simple.  

The last two games were narrow losses.  Add a healthy Rondo and narrow losses become wins.  

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #9 on: May 11, 2011, 10:41:29 PM »

Offline rl8373a

  • Baylor Scheierman
  • Posts: 16
  • Tommy Points: 1
I disagree, he would have helped our pathetic help defense and limited BBD's minutes.

Not saying we would have won, but he would have helped

Not going to disagree that he would have limited BBD minutes but so would have a 85% shaq and we saw that in game 3

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #10 on: May 11, 2011, 10:42:01 PM »

Offline rsan

  • The Green Kornet
  • Posts: 90
  • Tommy Points: 12
he could have helped but then how long would he have lasted on the court due to our wings getting beat by lebron and wade. if we don't have jeff, who else outside of pierce do we put on lebron? its a catch 22 when it comes to the trade. he would of prevented lay ups, but he would have had to help a lot.

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #11 on: May 11, 2011, 10:46:24 PM »

Offline GrandTheftRondo

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1952
  • Tommy Points: 167
Okay but the 2 people we traded for didn't help either. So now what?

I would have much rather kept our team chemistry in tact and lost than mess it all up in a trade deadline panic move and lose. But thats just my opinion.

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #12 on: May 11, 2011, 10:50:44 PM »

Offline Chief Macho

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1247
  • Tommy Points: 84
I disagree.  There was no interior defense in this series.  Perk would have helped there.  But most importantly basketball is about chemistry and trust.  When Perkins left the Celtics lost both.   You could see it, so stop defending an terrible risk that Ainge took.   

Also,  Green is garbage.   If the Celtics give big money to that stiff they won't compete anytime soon.

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #13 on: May 11, 2011, 10:53:15 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
I'm sorry but I am going to go out and say it Kendrick Perkins would not have helped here.  Niether would any of the other players that we traded.

Perkins was only effective against two teams, the Magic and the Lakers.  Any center put with the big 4 could put up the numbers that Perkins did offensively and JO did just as well as him defensively.

The reason for the trade was that we needed somebody to back up pierce and that is what we got.  Besides the occasional lapses I believe Green played really well especially on defense.  If anything the problem was that he did not get to play with the big 4. 

I believe Doc is a great coach but if you talk about a reason for making a trade and then never go with why even mention it.  Green needed davis' minutes from the time he came over in the trade.

Overall I am disappointed but I am still happy to be a celtics fan.  I don't think any team in the NBA had as many injuries over the course of the season and during the playoffs as us and I believe that the team played with heart and pride anyways.

4 years, 1 title and 3 what if injuries...I am not jumping for joy but after that 06-07 season I will definitely take it

well I just listened to Ray Allen's postgame comments and he said we lost because of too much interior scoring.

Wade and LeBron drove to the basket without fear and that is directly related to our interior defense being weakened. The defensive rotations were slow, not strong, and sometimes non-existent...

so, how exactly can you conclude that Perk would not have helped?

Because Perkins was injured, he was slow on defense and still is slow on defense.  Perkins himself wasn't going to stop the drives wade or lebron.  Perkins was a good one-on-one defender against howard/bynum because he had KG as help.  

The way you stop interior scoring from the wings is by not letting them get to the basket

That's not how our defense works. We are very dependent on rotations on penetration. You know they kept talking about our "wall"...

We just didn't have the personnel to stop the penetration.

as for Perk, I'm watching him in the OKC series and his legs looks fresh and his snarl looks mean.

Re: Perkins would not have helped here
« Reply #14 on: May 11, 2011, 10:55:31 PM »

Offline winsomme

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6058
  • Tommy Points: 255
I disagree.  There was no interior defense in this series.  Perk would have helped there.  But most importantly basketball is about chemistry and trust.  When Perkins left the Celtics lost both.   You could see it, so stop defending an terrible risk that Ainge took.   

Also,  Green is garbage.   If the Celtics give big money to that stiff they won't compete anytime soon.

I miss Perk dearly but I don't think Green is garbage. He is infuriating by not playing up to his skills but he's definitely not garage.

honestly, I think Danny made that trade because he thought he could get Green to play up to his potential....that clearly did not happen this year.