....as for JO...wasted MLE
Waste can be taken two ways (actually it has numerous connotations):
1. to squander:I think many folks on here when they use the word “wasted” have this definition in mind. I don’t think that Ainge did that. To squander implies carelessness at best and irresponsibility and recklessness at worst. Ainge took a chance and got the best FA big man available for the MLE. He took a risk and SO FAR, the risk hasn’t paid off. JO could have a minor scoping of his knee and be back by March. Who knows??
This brings us to the second meaning (and actually the first in most dictionaries) and the one that if I were to use the word waste in reference to the JO situation, I think best applies. That definition is “to employ uselessly or without adequate return.”
I agree with the second definition, but absolutely don’t agree with the first and what it implies. I don’t think that Ainge’s signing was careless, irresponsible or reckless. It was a calculated gamble, that if it paid off (and we still don’t know for sure that it won’t, even though it strongly looks that way) would have paid huge dividends for a relatively short price.