Ah well Who, I know you came at it with an open mind. I can't get mad about that.
Here is the thing that I think seals it for me:
1) Antawn Jamison is absolutely terrible defensively, truth.
2) John Salmons and Hedo Turkoglu are both terrible defensively as well.
3) The backup center for Dwight Howard is Greg Monroe. The third center is Ed Davis. Neither one can defend either of my starting front court.
If you accept 1, 2, and 3, then I don't see how the following is not true:
LeBron James will be able to penetrate the defense at will. There is no defender outside of Dwight Howard that can consistently force LeBron into an uncomfortable shot around the hoop. Dwight Howard will either have to let LeBron have his baskets, or he'll have to help in the paint. There is no defender on the wing that can begin the task of defending LeBron. If Dwight helps in the paint, he is as much of a foul liability as Joakim Noah, if not more-so.
The reason why Howard is more of a liability is that without Noah for long stretches of time, LeBron James could still carry the Bulls to keep the game close. LeBron is my best player, and I can choose if/when to sit him. He won't get into foul trouble.
Howard however could get into foul trouble, and when Howard is off the floor for Phoenix and my starters are in, there is no excuse for a non-blowout from Chicago. That's how poor defensively this team is.
That's my schpiel. Either you buy it or you don't. I believe that because of Phoenix's team construction, they will not be able to mount any kind of defense against LeBron, due ironically (if you've been reading the posts) to the two rookies behind Howard. Since Howard will either have to run the choice of being non-aggressive or running the risk of getting into early foul trouble, Chicago should be able to jump out into early leads in most of the games. From there Chicago has the personell to
Without Howard there is no recourse for the Phoenix. With Howard they can't stop LeBron because of the other weak defenders.