I don't get it. I just don't get it.
nate is a better defender than eddie
nate can create his own shot better than eddie
nate is a better ball handler and pg than eddie
nate is a consistent game changer off the bench
the only thing eddie is better than nate is shooting, but relies on others for his scoring, as he cant create his shot.
nate > eddie.
i love eddie's hustle and appreciate what he has done, but if u got the opportunity to upgrade, u do it.
Okay, but I'm not so sure this team needs a big upgrade talent-wise, at least not in this area. Rondo will be playing 40 minutes a game in the playoffs. That leaves 8 that I think Daniels can cover, while still being able to spend a significant amount of time guarding opposing 2s/3s to give Pierce or Ray a break. The Celtics are not struggling due to lack of offensive firepower off the bench. Part of it is mental, and it part of it is an aging core and bigs that are struggling to rebound.
If you want to light a fire under this team, I don't see how dumping Eddie is going to help matters. He brings a ton of energy to the table every night. Make a small change in the frontcourt, get another star in exchange for Ray, or do nothing at all.