Author Topic: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16  (Read 98118 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #375 on: February 17, 2010, 12:07:13 AM »

Offline mzepol

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 308
  • Tommy Points: 56
One of Sheed's better games as a Celtic. Hopefully he keeps it up.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #376 on: February 17, 2010, 12:07:16 AM »

Offline MF Doom

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 212
  • Tommy Points: 29
House, you truley will be missed

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #377 on: February 17, 2010, 12:07:29 AM »

Offline ejk3489

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2233
  • Tommy Points: 215
Pretty clear that you guys aren't watching OKC lately.  They're a good team.  Durant is as scary a scorer as has come along in a LONG time.

Agreed. They've won seven in a row now, and are only 2 games back from the 3 seed in the west. That's pretty impressive.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #378 on: February 17, 2010, 12:07:39 AM »

Offline Tai

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2230
  • Tommy Points: 32
Hey, you all still want to trade Rasheed?

Oh, ok.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #379 on: February 17, 2010, 12:07:43 AM »

Offline Thruthelookingglass

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • Tommy Points: 133
Its called winning ugly.  I don't care if its by 25 or by 5.  

I'll confess to caring a little, but mostly I'll take a win right now.  C's need to sort things out on the fly, and I'm all for stocking up a few W's while we are doing it.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #380 on: February 17, 2010, 12:07:59 AM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
C's winning the battle of the boards

C's shooting 80% at the FT line

C's holding the Kings to 37% shooting, though Kings are helping

C's increased the lead two quarters in a row

C's scored 19 points in the 3rd quarter played mostly by the starters

C's have missed at least 10 layups/fast break chances

C's are playing against one of the leagues worst teams and the starters are not beating the Kings starters



Yet, who's winning?

I hope the Celtics --- they SHOULD be winning against a team that is 18-34 shouldn't they???

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #381 on: February 17, 2010, 12:08:49 AM »

Offline PLamb

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1569
  • Tommy Points: 1
C's winning the battle of the boards

C's shooting 80% at the FT line

C's holding the Kings to 37% shooting, though Kings are helping

C's increased the lead two quarters in a row

C's scored 19 points in the 3rd quarter played mostly by the starters

C's have missed at least 10 layups/fast break chances

C's are playing against one of the leagues worst teams and the starters are not beating the Kings starters


C's only gave up 17 third quarter points

It doesn't matter who played most of the third quarter because we want the whole team to win not just a part of it

Sacramento is 13-12 at home and average 105.8 PPG at home yet they are on a pace for just 92
Pick 2 Knicks

PG: George Hill, Ty Lawson
SG: Ray Allen, Anthony Parker, Quentin Richardson
SF: Grant Hill, Matt Barnes, D
PF: Zach Randolph, Kenyon Martin, Jon Brockman, Dante Cunningham
C:  Nene Hilario,   Own rights: Nikola Pekovic IR: Kyle Weaver

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #382 on: February 17, 2010, 12:08:53 AM »

Offline Change

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6666
  • Tommy Points: 544
Pierce used be so effective on the Pink-N-Roll. He gets stuck now and makes bad decisions.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #383 on: February 17, 2010, 12:09:47 AM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Pretty clear that you guys aren't watching OKC lately.  They're a good team.  Durant is as scary a scorer as has come along in a LONG time.

Agreed. They've won seven in a row now, and are only 2 games back from the 3 seed in the west. That's pretty impressive.

Nevertheless, their starting center is Nenad Krstic.

The fact that they are within striking distance of the 3rd seed in the West says more about the soft middle of the West than it does about the Thunder's strength as a team.

The Thunder are going to be great in a couple of years, especially if they get a legit center to add to their core.  Right now they're just a young team dangerous enough to knock off a better team on any given night.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #384 on: February 17, 2010, 12:09:52 AM »

Offline PLamb

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1569
  • Tommy Points: 1
C's winning the battle of the boards

C's shooting 80% at the FT line

C's holding the Kings to 37% shooting, though Kings are helping

C's increased the lead two quarters in a row

C's scored 19 points in the 3rd quarter played mostly by the starters

C's have missed at least 10 layups/fast break chances

C's are playing against one of the leagues worst teams and the starters are not beating the Kings starters



Yet, who's winning?

I hope the Celtics --- they SHOULD be winning against a team that is 18-34 shouldn't they???
No they SHOULDN'T

You have to go out and win every night in this league

No team is a given win
Pick 2 Knicks

PG: George Hill, Ty Lawson
SG: Ray Allen, Anthony Parker, Quentin Richardson
SF: Grant Hill, Matt Barnes, D
PF: Zach Randolph, Kenyon Martin, Jon Brockman, Dante Cunningham
C:  Nene Hilario,   Own rights: Nikola Pekovic IR: Kyle Weaver

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #385 on: February 17, 2010, 12:10:06 AM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
i want a win...but my point is the kings have given boston every opportunity to blow this game wide open...yet they cannot do it. we again find ourselves sweating it out vs an inferior team

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #386 on: February 17, 2010, 12:10:38 AM »

Offline Thruthelookingglass

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • Tommy Points: 133
Pierce used be so effective on the Pink-N-Roll. He gets stuck now and makes bad decisions.

This brings to mind at least one or two not-so-PC comments.  But we know what you mean . . . don't we?    :D

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #387 on: February 17, 2010, 12:11:08 AM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7375
  • Tommy Points: 570
Who on this team to you feel confident going to now on offense?  I can't think of anyone.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #388 on: February 17, 2010, 12:12:00 AM »

Offline Kuberski33

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7375
  • Tommy Points: 570
We're headed for another bad L it's looking like.

Re: Celtics (32-18) at Kings (18-34) 2/16
« Reply #389 on: February 17, 2010, 12:12:09 AM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32877
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
Who on this team to you feel confident going to now on offense?  I can't think of anyone.

nate robinson