Author Topic: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28  (Read 125375 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #375 on: December 29, 2009, 01:09:15 AM »

Kiorrik

  • Guest
ROFL that was absolutely awesome :D :D :D

Hahaha I love KG & Perk :D

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #376 on: December 29, 2009, 01:09:17 AM »

Offline Thruthelookingglass

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2687
  • Tommy Points: 133
They're panicking now. Trying to catch them quick... horrible horrible horrible

Sigh.  We didn't have to be in this position.

What, You think the C's should have been able to take advantage of building an 18-point lead in the first quarter against the worst defensive team in the NBA?

Yes. What else do you think he meant?

I think we're all feeling a little bitter about this.  Tough to watch. 

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #377 on: December 29, 2009, 01:09:42 AM »

Offline mzepol

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 308
  • Tommy Points: 56
That's game.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #378 on: December 29, 2009, 01:10:18 AM »

Offline Chief

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21257
  • Tommy Points: 2451
Geesh, some of you guys, I won't name names, are just a bundle of fun to watch games with. ::) ::)

I'm not what you call a guy that loves all the "rah rah" stuff but the blatant and consistent negativity in every single post gets a bit much after a while, don't you think.

? Everyone watches a game differently. I think these type posts just causes arguments. :)
Once you are labeled 'the best' you want to stay up there, and you can't do it by loafing around.
 
Larry Bird

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #379 on: December 29, 2009, 01:10:22 AM »

Offline ChainSmokingLikeDino

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1422
  • Tommy Points: 96
Geesh, some of you guys, I won't name names, are just a bundle of fun to watch games with. ::) ::)


You know what? I hate unwarranted positivity.

All the negativity wouldn´t be so excessive if some people could simply acknowledge when the team stinks.

I mean, if the C´s would lead by 15, you wouldn´t have to read so much negativity.

Some of these comments would have you think this is a 6-23 teams. I mean, come on.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #380 on: December 29, 2009, 01:10:48 AM »

Offline ToppersBsktball10

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1424
  • Tommy Points: 27
  • Smooth As Silk.
So close...

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #381 on: December 29, 2009, 01:11:16 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
Geesh, some of you guys, I won't name names, are just a bundle of fun to watch games with. ::) ::)


You know what? I hate unwarranted positivity.

All the negativity wouldn´t be so excessive if some people could simply acknowledge when the team stinks.

I mean, if the C´s would lead by 15, you wouldn´t have to read so much negativity.

Some of these comments would have you think this is a 6-23 teams. I mean, come on.

You guys are all right. We should all be happy about back-to-back losses to bad teams. What am I thinking?

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #382 on: December 29, 2009, 01:11:58 AM »

Offline vinnie

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8654
  • Tommy Points: 429
88 gamne winning streak win leading by 16 or more in a game comes to an end. Game ends on 26th turnover of the game. But what a great effort by the C's.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #383 on: December 29, 2009, 01:12:03 AM »

Offline jadams5214

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1021
  • Tommy Points: 82
Another bad loss to another bad team, but no negativity. Great effort by the Celtics. They are going to score 99 points against the worst defensive team in the NBA.

Vinnie you are right!  --- The C's should be praised for playing so hard tonight.  After all they were playing back to back nights against two of the worst teams in the NBA.  They only had 2 Hall of Famers and another probably All Star available to play.  And the Warriors are MUCH better than their 8-21 record they are tough.  Just like the Clippers are better than there 13-17 record!  The C's lost to both teams last year too but that's OK they fought hard.  

How could they possibly expect to win these games against the NBA's worst teams that is too much to ask!
And hey the announcers just said the C's had won 88 straight games when having over a 16 point lead.  That streak couldn't possibly continue!

Way to GO let's keep it positive!

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #384 on: December 29, 2009, 01:12:07 AM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45920
  • Tommy Points: 3340
What are the chances GSW pulls a Boston Celtics and leaves Ray open for the three?

Ray should've went up with a shot and got a BS call like GS got in the 1st half.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #385 on: December 29, 2009, 01:12:29 AM »

Offline ToppersBsktball10

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1424
  • Tommy Points: 27
  • Smooth As Silk.
Chill a little bit guys. I'm not happy either but it'll come.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #386 on: December 29, 2009, 01:12:35 AM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
Geesh, some of you guys, I won't name names, are just a bundle of fun to watch games with. ::) ::)

I'm not what you call a guy that loves all the "rah rah" stuff but the blatant and consistent negativity in every single post gets a bit much after a while, don't you think.

? Everyone watches a game differently. I think these type posts just causes arguments. :)

There is a bandit of guys that only post negative comments and I would ban them if I was running the show.

We shouldn't be positive all the time, but when those guys come in here acting like a loss in December without our best player means we aren't a championship contender, it's just a tad bit unbearable.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #387 on: December 29, 2009, 01:13:09 AM »

Offline WeMadeIt17

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3397
  • Tommy Points: 435
I really didn't like the idea of missing that 2nd free throw with Ray on the line at least we go and foul then get a desperation shot off rather then them going up four.. Really didn't like that call

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #388 on: December 29, 2009, 01:13:17 AM »

Offline mzepol

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 308
  • Tommy Points: 56
Someone should tell Doc that THAT's how to end game when you're up by 3 in the closing seconds.

Re: Celtics (23-6) at Warriors (8-21) 12/28
« Reply #389 on: December 29, 2009, 01:13:51 AM »

Offline BigBaby

  • Kristaps Porzingis
  • Posts: 182
  • Tommy Points: 9
man i can't believe we gave up that lead. we are definitely feeling fatigued after last night.