Author Topic: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Voting Analysis : Team of the Future  (Read 666872 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #255 on: July 28, 2009, 07:23:35 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
I think my team would have won the NBA title in this year's real NBA. I honestly do. i just keep staring at its well balanced and well rounded perfection.

What's that?

You shut up Darko! You'll play within yourself and you'll like it! I will send you to the Chinese Basketball League if you keep this up!!

Haha.  Funny.

Too young, my friend, too young.  Plus, in the real NBA, Big Al's ACL snapped like a twig.

I'd like to submit that big al's MCL snapped like the bow of a great redwood with abnormal healing powers.

That's cool.  In the "fake" NBA, Portland's roster has been fitted with adamantium skeletons.  (We're staying silent about whether it's with or without claws, but I'd suggest people not make us mad).

Disclaimer:  such skeletons are subject to removal should we ever decide to trade any of our players.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #256 on: July 28, 2009, 07:24:54 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
Oh yeah? I shotgun winner, no quitsies no backsies!!!

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #257 on: July 28, 2009, 07:25:05 PM »

Offline KCattheStripe

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10726
  • Tommy Points: 830
So how do people feel about the Bruce Bowen move. Are you buying my "he will be my team's defensive sensai" idea? I think a little experience and leadership goes a long way.

He seems kinda out of place on your team, but he can't hurt.
I thought about that..but then I also thought "who defends the Paul Pierces or Kobe's if Travis Outlaw isn't in there?"...Bruce Bowen will make him better, and he will make my 2nd and 3rd units less of a liability.

I don't think you give Josh Howard's defense enough credit.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #258 on: July 28, 2009, 07:25:58 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
So how do people feel about the Bruce Bowen move. Are you buying my "he will be my team's defensive sensai" idea? I think a little experience and leadership goes a long way.

He seems kinda out of place on your team, but he can't hurt.
I thought about that..but then I also thought "who defends the Paul Pierces or Kobe's if Travis Outlaw isn't in there?"...Bruce Bowen will make him better, and he will make my 2nd and 3rd units less of a liability.

I don't think you give Josh Howard's defense enough credit.

Well, I will look into that. I'd counted on him being average.

EDIT: Memphis apparently knows me better than I know myself.

Hollinger's take:
Quote
Howard is one of the league's best two-way forwards, able to defend capably, but skilled enough to average a point every two minutes. He's 6-foot-7 and quick enough to defend all three perimeter positions. However, for some reason he stopped drawing charges last season, falling from 35 a year earlier to just nine last year. The Mavs still gave up 3.2 points fewer per 48 minutes with him on the court, but between the drop off in offensive fouls drawn and the diminished blocks and steals, one gets the impression his effort level waned considerably last year.

I mean...Howard can be a Wackadoo sometimes, but I feel like what I need out of him is 18 points a night, average to good defense, and not to do anything stupid. If he does that I like our chances.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #259 on: July 28, 2009, 07:30:28 PM »

Offline KCattheStripe

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10726
  • Tommy Points: 830
I think my team would have won the NBA title in this year's real NBA. I honestly do. i just keep staring at its well balanced and well rounded perfection.

What's that?

You shut up Darko! You'll play within yourself and you'll like it! I will send you to the Chinese Basketball League if you keep this up!!

Haha.  Funny.

Too young, my friend, too young.  Plus, in the real NBA, Big Al's ACL snapped like a twig.

I'd like to submit that big al's MCL snapped like the bow of a great redwood with abnormal healing powers.

That's cool.  In the "fake" NBA, Portland's roster has been fitted with adamantium skeletons.  (We're staying silent about whether it's with or without claws, but I'd suggest people not make us mad).

Disclaimer:  such skeletons are subject to removal should we ever decide to trade any of our players.

Oh yeah, well the Grizzlies have all been granted contorl over electro-magnetic energy.



or



oops.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #260 on: July 28, 2009, 07:31:24 PM »

Offline KCattheStripe

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10726
  • Tommy Points: 830
So how do people feel about the Bruce Bowen move. Are you buying my "he will be my team's defensive sensai" idea? I think a little experience and leadership goes a long way.

He seems kinda out of place on your team, but he can't hurt.
I thought about that..but then I also thought "who defends the Paul Pierces or Kobe's if Travis Outlaw isn't in there?"...Bruce Bowen will make him better, and he will make my 2nd and 3rd units less of a liability.

I don't think you give Josh Howard's defense enough credit.

Well, I will look into that. I'd counted on him being average.

EDIT: Memphis apparently knows me better than I know myself.

Hollinger's take:
Quote
Howard is one of the league's best two-way forwards, able to defend capably, but skilled enough to average a point every two minutes. He's 6-foot-7 and quick enough to defend all three perimeter positions. However, for some reason he stopped drawing charges last season, falling from 35 a year earlier to just nine last year. The Mavs still gave up 3.2 points fewer per 48 minutes with him on the court, but between the drop off in offensive fouls drawn and the diminished blocks and steals, one gets the impression his effort level waned considerably last year.

I mean...Howard can be a Wackadoo sometimes, but I feel like what I need out of him is 18 points a night, average to good defense, and not to do anything stupid. If he does that I like our chances.

You're welcome.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #261 on: July 28, 2009, 07:35:21 PM »

Offline RebusRankin

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9143
  • Tommy Points: 923
Oh yeah, Dwight Howard has had Bob McAdoo's shooting ability magically grafted into his game.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #262 on: July 28, 2009, 07:55:57 PM »

Offline The Walker Wiggle

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4568
  • Tommy Points: 758
  • Pretend Hinkie
That's cool.  In the "fake" NBA, Portland's roster has been fitted with adamantium skeletons.  (We're staying silent about whether it's with or without claws, but I'd suggest people not make us mad).

Disclaimer:  such skeletons are subject to removal should we ever decide to trade any of our players.

For those of you not up on your Celticsblog draft history, Hobbs developed the "T.J. Ford gambit" last season.

I just like Portland and Buffalo better.

Right now, I thinks its Portland than Buffalo in the West.

And in regards to Portland and Buffalo’s blossoming love affair. Is the rest of the Western Conference already as bored as I am? Yawn.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #263 on: July 28, 2009, 07:59:47 PM »

Offline KCattheStripe

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10726
  • Tommy Points: 830
And in regards to Portland and Buffalo’s blossoming love affair. Is the rest of the Western Conference already as bored as I am? Yawn.

I love you fake Houston Rockets.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #264 on: July 28, 2009, 08:03:56 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Taking things in another direction what are the leading teams for team of the future?

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #265 on: July 28, 2009, 08:04:51 PM »

Offline RebusRankin

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9143
  • Tommy Points: 923
Denver has the team of the future lead imo.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #266 on: July 28, 2009, 08:07:59 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Denver has the team of the future lead imo.

I think that's right.

San Antonio was a possibility for awhile, but they went in a different direction.

Interestingly, I'd but Orlando as another very, very strong contender for this title, but I believe the rule this season is that a team can only contend for either "win now" *or* "team of the future" in the voting.  I could be wrong on that, though.

Miami has some good pieces.  Phoenix is very, very strong with a Big Al / Rondo combo.  Depending upon how you define "the future", Washington is in the discussion.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #267 on: July 28, 2009, 08:10:28 PM »

Offline Kwhit10

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4257
  • Tommy Points: 923
4 of my starting 5 are also pretty young, prime to enter their primes.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #268 on: July 28, 2009, 08:12:06 PM »

Offline johnnyrondo

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4038
  • Tommy Points: 1245
4 of my starting 5 are also pretty young, prime to enter their primes.

I like your team a good deal. Just missing a backup big imo, but you've done well.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Roster Analysis Thread
« Reply #269 on: July 28, 2009, 08:25:16 PM »

Offline bucknersrevenge

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1967
  • Tommy Points: 170
Denver has the team of the future lead imo.

What?? Madness!! The Bucks have it on lock man! That's crazy talk.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity...