Author Topic: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Voting Analysis : Team of the Future  (Read 673512 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1410 on: August 14, 2009, 02:28:08 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
They're both bad rebounders.
You're a bad rebounder.
Your Mom's a bad rebounder.

Seriously though I dunno why some shorter stronger guys are good rebounders (Leon), and some are not (Baby)...its all a mystery. They're both bad rebeounders though.

Rodman and Barkley weren't tall. I think height and rebounding don't go together as much as people want them too. Of course a 7 footer will rebound better than a 6 footer, but when you're talking the difference of 6'8" vs 6'10" much more goes into who will rebound better than the height advantage.

Also some shorter guys who rebound well have long arms. No one rebounds with the top of their head. :)

Oh I disagree sir!!! I would take Rondo rebounding rather than blount any day :P

I agree with that one. We agree! World peace is possible! :)

We can't have that.

JR, why will your team beat Toronto if you guys are fortunate enough to meet in the second round?

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1411 on: August 14, 2009, 02:29:20 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
It feels like independance day when everybody works together against a common enemy.  Except in that case it was aliens that are trying destory man kind and in our case its Mark Blount.
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1412 on: August 14, 2009, 02:30:13 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
jgod: any chance you justify some of your votes? Like maybe how you have Phoenix #8?

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1413 on: August 14, 2009, 02:30:31 PM »

Offline Hoyo de Monterrey

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1981
  • Tommy Points: 669
ATTENTION GMS OF: New York, Chicago, Detroit, Indiana, Milwaukee, Atlanta, Miami/Cuba, Charlotte, Denver, Utah, Houston, Memphis, San Antonio, Golden State, Buffalo, AND Las Vegas!!!

IF YOU HAVE NOT DONE SO, PUT YOUR ROSTERS IN THE CB DRAFT SIMULATED SEASON PLANS THREAD PLEASE, ALONG WITH THE REAL NBA TEAMS YOUR PLAYERS ARE ON! THIS WILL HELP IN THE SIMLUATION! SEE THE EXAMPLES IN THAT THREAD!

THANK YOU.

"Let me call him," Floyd said.

The man shook his head. "O.J. doesn't give out his cell," he said. "He'll call you."

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1414 on: August 14, 2009, 02:30:37 PM »

Offline riah32

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 888
  • Tommy Points: 94
riah, there's a reason why your team is continually being rated between 9 and 13 in  the West. It's because it's not good.

If your team got into the playoffs, no offense I dont see how mine doesnt? I have 2 legit all stars a good but not great pg and i think a fairly decent pf in thompson and a back-up in Craig Smith thats good

Yeah, that's kinda calling my team out! No offense!


Nicck I did add the no offense in my defense. I was actually trying to bring your team down but trying to get people to draw a comparising even though you have a little more depth then I do i feel I got to players that make are teams almost equal but you might have me by a little just because of my lack of depth at the center.
Indiana Pacers-Celticsblog Draft Team

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1415 on: August 14, 2009, 02:31:04 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
jgod: any chance you justify some of your votes? Like maybe how you have Phoenix #8?

I'm sure it involves the words "lane clogging bigs" and "point guard who can't shoot".

;)

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1416 on: August 14, 2009, 02:31:45 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
They're both bad rebounders.
You're a bad rebounder.
Your Mom's a bad rebounder.

Seriously though I dunno why some shorter stronger guys are good rebounders (Leon), and some are not (Baby)...its all a mystery. They're both bad rebeounders though.

Rodman and Barkley weren't tall. I think height and rebounding don't go together as much as people want them too. Of course a 7 footer will rebound better than a 6 footer, but when you're talking the difference of 6'8" vs 6'10" much more goes into who will rebound better than the height advantage.

Also some shorter guys who rebound well have long arms. No one rebounds with the top of their head. :)

Oh I disagree sir!!! I would take Rondo rebounding rather than blount any day :P

I agree with that one. We agree! World peace is possible! :)

We can't have that.

JR, why will your team beat Toronto if you guys are fortunate enough to meet in the second round?

Dont answer that question JR!!! ITS A TRAP!!!  
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1417 on: August 14, 2009, 02:33:07 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
He is not more ready than thabeet there stasing him over seas.....thabeet is playing in the NBA next year and hasnt played basketbll as many years as most of these guys have and U think based on that he will be really goood after about a month ir so of playing.

They brought Ibaka over this summer, signed him to a 2 yr contract.

And I think Thabeet will be worse this year because it takes big men longer to adapt to the NBA game, especially undersized big men. (muscle-wise. I know he's 10 ft tall)

Look, I think Thabeet will eventually be good, but you're counting on chicks that haven't hatched yet.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1418 on: August 14, 2009, 02:34:48 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
jgod: any chance you justify some of your votes? Like maybe how you have Phoenix #8?

I'm sure it involves the words "lane clogging bigs" and "point guard who can't shoot".

;)

Helping or hurting, Roy? Helping or hurting?

Besides, you fully expect Rondo's jump shot to improve. I dunno how you keep misremembering that, Mr. Gonzales.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1419 on: August 14, 2009, 02:35:28 PM »

Offline riah32

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 888
  • Tommy Points: 94
He is not more ready than thabeet there stasing him over seas.....thabeet is playing in the NBA next year and hasnt played basketbll as many years as most of these guys have and U think based on that he will be really goood after about a month ir so of playing.

They brought Ibaka over this summer, signed him to a 2 yr contract.

And I think Thabeet will be worse this year because it takes big men longer to adapt to the NBA game, especially undersized big men. (muscle-wise. I know he's 10 ft tall)

Look, I think Thabeet will eventually be good, but you're counting on chicks that haven't hatched yet.

Ip who is your back-up 4 anyways?
Indiana Pacers-Celticsblog Draft Team

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1420 on: August 14, 2009, 02:36:50 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
He is not more ready than thabeet there stasing him over seas.....thabeet is playing in the NBA next year and hasnt played basketbll as many years as most of these guys have and U think based on that he will be really goood after about a month ir so of playing.

They brought Ibaka over this summer, signed him to a 2 yr contract.

And I think Thabeet will be worse this year because it takes big men longer to adapt to the NBA game, especially undersized big men. (muscle-wise. I know he's 10 ft tall)

Look, I think Thabeet will eventually be good, but you're counting on chicks that haven't hatched yet.

Ip who is your back-up 4 anyways?

I answered that like 10 pages ago. If I post it again, will you read it this time?

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1421 on: August 14, 2009, 02:38:37 PM »

Offline RebusRankin

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9143
  • Tommy Points: 923
My bench isn't as bad as people think.


Did your 6th man just get traded for Mark Blount?


(I know, cheap shot)

Umm Zaza is officially the 6th man. Yeah thats it.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1422 on: August 14, 2009, 02:39:52 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
He is not more ready than thabeet there stasing him over seas.....thabeet is playing in the NBA next year and hasnt played basketbll as many years as most of these guys have and U think based on that he will be really goood after about a month ir so of playing.

They brought Ibaka over this summer, signed him to a 2 yr contract.

And I think Thabeet will be worse this year because it takes big men longer to adapt to the NBA game, especially undersized big men. (muscle-wise. I know he's 10 ft tall)

Look, I think Thabeet will eventually be good, but you're counting on chicks that haven't hatched yet.

Ip who is your back-up 4 anyways?

I answered that like 10 pages ago. If I post it again, will you read it this time?

http://forums.celticsblog.com/index.php?topic=30775.msg563269#msg563269

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1423 on: August 14, 2009, 02:41:39 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
They're both bad rebounders.
You're a bad rebounder.
Your Mom's a bad rebounder.

Seriously though I dunno why some shorter stronger guys are good rebounders (Leon), and some are not (Baby)...its all a mystery. They're both bad rebeounders though.
Lol the ultimate comeback. I think that most shorter stronger guys, do not have good rebounding numbers, but they do box out well which is in my opinion the most important part of rebounding.
How badly was the Celtics team rebounding hurt when KG went down? If I remember correctly it wasn't a large margin, even though Baby's rebounding numbers are much worse than KG's, everyone else on the team's numbers went up because although BBD doesn't rebound at a high rate he creates rebounding opportunities by boxing out.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1424 on: August 14, 2009, 02:43:37 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
They're both bad rebounders.
You're a bad rebounder.
Your Mom's a bad rebounder.

Seriously though I dunno why some shorter stronger guys are good rebounders (Leon), and some are not (Baby)...its all a mystery. They're both bad rebeounders though.
Lol the ultimate comeback. I think that most shorter stronger guys, do not have good rebounding numbers, but they do box out well which is in my opinion the most important part of rebounding.
How badly was the Celtics team rebounding hurt when KG went down? If I remember correctly it wasn't a large margin, even though Baby's rebounding numbers are much worse than KG's, everyone else on the team's numbers went up because although BBD doesn't rebound at a high rate he creates rebounding opportunities by boxing out.
little bit worse

you may be on to something there, but the images most fresh in my  mins are the eones with d12 rebounding over BBD.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner