Um, I keep saying this, but it couldve been much worse...He couldve retaliated after Maxiell got up, put out his chest, shoved perk and punched rondo...but he didnt do anything and looked like he realized what he did was wrong and deserving of an ejeection.
Did you see shaqs foul on stuckey, or Bynums on Gerald Wallace? it happens..it was a hard foul, a little bit dirty, but dissapointed in perk? um no...now if he swung at Maxiell after maxiell clearly punched rondo, maybe
Youre the same guy who said "this celtics team is a dissapointment" yet they won a title there first year together, and sit here today with the best record in the league...get over it
Lol what? Perkins definitely did not make a play on the ball, so it's a Flagrant 1 without question. Perk did not even pretend to make a play on the ball. That said, Flagrant 2 is pushing it - relatively speaking this was not so bad.
It had been a chippy game from the beginning. Maxiell got away with a foul on House on the rebound. Perk decided to ascribe to the "No Layups" philosophy and took Maxiell down. Yeah, there was a headlock involved, but it's not like he swung, tackled, or did anything else with momentum. He simply brought the man down and walked away.
As far as the "retaliation" you speak of. No punch was thrown at Rondo. I don't know where the hell you came up with that. Watch the replay, watch it twice...watch it drunk. There is no punch.
Does Maxiell deserve a suspension for pushing Perk? No. He was "standing up for himself" (knowing the refs and his team were going to separate him from Perk. Is Perk a Bad Boy for taking down Maxiell? No, he walked away, even after getting pushed. He wasn't going to brawl anyone, and rightfully so.
I'd be shocked to see any suspensions over this. I'd actually be quite surprised if Perk's F2 doesn't get downgraded to F1. On second thought, given Perk's reputation, maybe not.
But this is much ado about nothing. I really think it had no tangible impact on the game from either side.