How would you know? You werent in the huddle. It sure seemed to me KG was on him for sucking out there..
That doesn't mean that he thinks Big Baby stinks.
In this particular game, KG was unhappy with Davis' play. Don't try to back up what you're saying with the statement that KG thinks Big Baby lacks ability, when you have no evidence of that.
Both are around 6'8" or less.
Correct
Both are poor rebounders.
Wrong. Davis is known for his ability to create space and grab offensive boards.
Both are overweight.
This is basically just thrown in there to (tick) me off further, and who knows if they are actually overweight or not? Plus, many would say Davis' weight is a positive.
Both are lauded for hustle play. Both are lauded for good team defense.
Is that supposed to be a bad thing?
Both are routinely outplayed by the man they guard.
Judging them on how well they play in comparison to the man they guard is not fair to either one, although I feel that that statement applies to Scal more, as his job isn't to outperform his man (if that were his job, he wouldn't be in the league right now). Davis has shown some man-to-man defensive prowess (see Spurs game last year vs. Duncan).
Both are very limited offensively.
Incorrect. Davis is a multifaceted offensive player. He can score the garbage points after offensive rebounds, he has a post up game, he's a decent ball handler, he's developing a jumper, according to Doc he's the best pick setter on the team, and he has excellent passing skills and court vision.
I had a feeling you'd respond with something from 82games.com. Yes, I've looked there myself and I've noticed that about Davis and Scal. The problem is, their roland ratings and plus/minus numbers are extrememly skewed by the amount of garbage time these guys play. Both have much better numbers on that site when you take out the garbage time, and they are the rotational players that have played the most garbage time, so their numbers are more likely to be effected than others.