Author Topic: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two  (Read 265081 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #885 on: August 05, 2008, 10:00:57 PM »

Offline RebusRankin

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9143
  • Tommy Points: 923
Wasn't somebody putting all of the teams from this year into a simulation?

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #886 on: August 05, 2008, 10:03:05 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
double post


« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 02:40:11 AM by LarBrd33 »

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #887 on: August 05, 2008, 10:08:23 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
double post
« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 02:39:49 AM by LarBrd33 »

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #888 on: August 05, 2008, 10:10:19 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
"Bobcats trade:  3rd round (#26)
Wizards trade:  4th round (#2), 5th round (#8), 9th round (#8), 9th round (#29)"

Not a example when you are trying to say trades shouldn't be vetoed.  Im pretty sure taking advantage of somebody in this fashion is illegal in 48 states. 
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #889 on: August 05, 2008, 10:11:16 PM »

Offline zerophase

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2394
  • Tommy Points: 334
  • Anything's Possible
suck it up, shut up, or leave the league.

all of those terms used in good intentions of course.

Become Legendary.

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #890 on: August 05, 2008, 10:14:02 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
double post
« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 02:39:31 AM by LarBrd33 »

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #891 on: August 05, 2008, 10:20:45 PM »

Offline Rondo2287

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13009
  • Tommy Points: 816
Fact of the matter is larbrd is that you have made several questionable trades.  This one did not involve you and you are really making yourself look like a jerk so i suggest you simmer down.
CB Draft LA Lakers: Lamarcus Aldridge, Carmelo Anthony,Jrue Holiday, Wes Matthews  6.11, 7.16, 8.14, 8.15, 9.16, 11.5, 11.16

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #892 on: August 05, 2008, 10:23:44 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
"Bobcats trade:  3rd round (#26)
Wizards trade:  4th round (#2), 5th round (#8), 9th round (#8), 9th round (#29)"

Not a example when you are trying to say trades shouldn't be vetoed.  Im pretty sure taking advantage of somebody in this fashion is illegal in 48 states. 


That's your opinion, of course... but not my opinion... or the other person who agreed to make the trade.   The end result of that trade would have had the Wizards with:

 3rd rounder
 3rd rounder
 3rd rounder
 3rd rounder
 3rd rounder
 ------------
 4th rounder
 4th rounder
 5th rounder
 6th rounder

And then the rest of the terrible GM's here would have overpaid to trade into the 3rd round.


Or, inversely, the owner could  have had:

 3rd rounder
 3rd rounder
 3rd rounder
 3rd rounder
 ------------
 4th rounder (#2)
 4th rounder
 4th rounder
 5th rounder
 5th rounder
 6th rounder

Are you really still trying to argue that the difference between the #86 pick and the #92 pick is worth a pick at the top of the fifth round and two ninth rounders?

Come on...  you'd be more credible without the double-speak. ;)  The disagreement with the Bosh trade is legit.  Trying to defend your steal of a trade?  Not so much.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #893 on: August 05, 2008, 10:29:39 PM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
double post
« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 02:39:14 AM by LarBrd33 »

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #894 on: August 05, 2008, 10:36:09 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Quote
Shouldn't have to "Defend" my steal of a trade.  That's like Mitch Kupchick trying to "Defend" his steal of Pau Gasol.  My fellow Gm's can wha wha about not having as much skill as I ... but I take offense to people who want to wha wha and then fix the results of a game, because they are having trouble keeping up :-P ... We all started with the same advantage.  isn't the point to put together the best team you can?  Having a safety net on this complete negates the POINT of this game... to see who can put together the best team.

Conceptually, I agree, in that I prefer "veto free" leagues.  However, this league has a veto system, which has been clear since the first post of this thread.

"I take offense to people who want to wha wha and then fix the results of a game, because they are having trouble keeping up"

Is anybody doing that?  Nobody is crying to wdleehi.  Rather, he exercised his own judgment about a trade he found distasteful.  Disagreement with that judgment if you want, but to say he's "fixing" the game, or that other posters are asking him to do so, is inaccurate.

wdleehi is trying to keep the game fair, by vetoing trades that he finds beyond the pale.  Different people have different views on where the line is, and wdleehi made a judgment call.  Right or wrong, he made it, and at this point, I think it's best for all involved to move on, complete this draft, and make appropriate changes (if any) next year.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #895 on: August 05, 2008, 11:14:10 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34116
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I am happy to accept whatever monetary fine the league gives me for speaking out against the league and the commissioner... David Ste.. er.. I mean wdleehi has failed me.


Yes.  I failed what you wanted.


But I succeeded in following the rules as I have laid out. 


Next time, read them more carefully and expect them to be enforced. 

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #896 on: August 05, 2008, 11:57:05 PM »

Offline KCattheStripe

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10726
  • Tommy Points: 830
HI EVERYBODY! Oh boy oh boy. First of all thank you Wheedli for taking time out of your actual life to run a fantasy league. Gracias senor, gracias.

When you PMed me back saying why would I trade Bosh for the picks I did, I laid out what I thought was a fair strategy. With Chris Bosh and a late third round pick, I don't have a team that can compete in any of the catagories as I understood them ( Win now, Bright Future, G.M. of the year.)However, I had a plan with the the four 3rd rounders I would have cultivated with that trade, plus a fourth that I would have tried to cultivate with my remaining 4's, I would have 5 picks in the third round. As I sent Wdleehi in the PM I planned on having a roster that resembled,

PG. Hinrich
SG. ( I honestly forget who i had picked at the SG position, Whoever it was they could run and shoot)
SF. Josh Howard
PF. Tayshaun
C. Biedrins

I realized that if I could put together this team, or something close to it, I could have  a young talented starting five that could possibly win "bright future". I had dug my self a huge whole with two early ( OK I'll admit it, premature trades) I had the 17th pick and the 86th. That would leave me with: Bosh and Hinrich. That won't win anything.

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #897 on: August 06, 2008, 12:57:34 AM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
ubuntu
« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 02:49:03 AM by LarBrd33 »

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #898 on: August 06, 2008, 02:55:09 AM »

Offline Gainesville Celtic

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5544
  • Tommy Points: 1331
  • Ainge *still* has a Posse! Ubuntu Y'all
Throughout the movie PI the lead character restates his assumptions throughout the movie as a way to add calm to chaos around him.  My assumptions:

1. Boatloads of TPs to Wdleehi (and to a lesser degree the other Mods) for putting this all together.  LOTS of work on their part, Lots of fun on my/other's part.
2. It's a game.
3. Hopefully we can all work together to make the most fun/good game possible.
4. When posting, be honest, Be willing  to be wrong and admit it and/or correct mistakes.
5. Don't argue to win or for arguments sake, argue to get at the truth.. to the best answer.

-------------

Whether or not anything changes, i'd publicly ask LarBird to tone it down. You disagree, we get it. I've said that to him off-list, so i'm comfortable saying it here.

That said, and with all due respect to Wdleehi who's said he won't change his ruling, I'd also throw my 2 cents in for rescinding the Bosh veto.  IMO there are 3 --and only 3 -- comparison points:

1. "Lopsided" deals --- IMO, the most lopsided deal has been:

Quote
Bobcats trade:  1st round pick (#11), 8th round pick (#23) and 14th round pick (#18)

Nuggets trade:  1st round pick (#17),  2nd round pick (#14) and 15th round pick (#17)

6 spots in the 1st round for a 2nd rounder? Yikes. But that wasn't vetoed and I agree with that decision.  If DEN agreed to it, then that's on them, not CHA. 


2. "Superstar" deals --- IMO, this is the best "data" we have.  The closest parallels to the Bosh deal -- in terms of superstars getting traded AFTER being selected -- are these 3 deals.  Iguodala, et al are not in this class, AND were not traded AFTER being picked, so those trades don't apply:


Quote
Tim Duncan:

ORLANDO sends rights to Kevin Durant, 3rd round pick (#13) and 5th round pick (#14)

LAKERS sends rights to Tim Duncan, and a 5th round pick (#1)

Quote
Dwayne Wade

Pistons send: Dwyane Wade, 4th rounder (17) 5th rounder (10) and 9th rounder (10)

to Cavs for: 2nd rounder (8 ), 3rd rounder (23), 4th rounder (8 ), 15th rounder (23)

Quote
Chris Bosh:

Wizards send:  Chris Bosh
Warriors send:  3rd round (#3), 3rd round (#24), 4th round (#28)

Approx cost for Duncan: 1st*, 3rd, swap 5th  (*Durant was chosen for Lakers as 1st round, then dealt)
Approx cost for Wade:  2nd, 3rd, swap 4ths, 5th (leaving out 9th/15th rounders)
Approx cost for Bosh:  3rd, 3rd, 4th

Duncan has 3 rings, Wade 1 ring, Bosh 1 all-star appearence.  Each player fetched a 3rd, Duncan got a 1st too, Wade got a 2nd, so that Bosh, the lesser of the 3 players,  g a 3rd doesnt' seem ridiculously off base.  (NOTE: These deals were made totally independently of one another).


3. Rigidity of the rules ---

Wdleehi was firm in (a) not letting DEN change their pick from Brand to Bosh, despite the fact no one else had picked yet and (b) in LAKERS missing their pick.  In each instance i was fine with the Commish holding fast to the rules and had hoped that the top 4 GMs in the LAKERS #1 pick debacle coudl work it out among themselves.

So my undestanding was that the veto power -- while inherently subjective -- would be essentially a rubber stamp (see: goofy posts on MON of rubber stamp images).  So to be less rigid on the "rules" -- especially since the Warriors GM has weighed in with, IMO, a convincing rationale for why the were making the deal (If in his shoes I only hope that I would be as creative)--- seems counter to past practice. 


Therefore, with some trepidation in regards to fanning any flames, I would weigh in that the Bosh veto be lifted 

Regardless of what happens, this is my one and only post on this question.   I will not respond to others' responses . I would further ask/suggest that unless folks have something new to add or haven't weighed in, other folks let it go and stop going back and forth over trying to prove this or that point.  Simply state your opinion, weigh in if you want and move on.  We need no more dead horses.

Ubuntu, y'all.  Here's to a fun 3rd-15th rounds!
« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 03:00:18 AM by Gainesville Celtic »
GC's Yahoo! H2h League: Gainesville Celtics: 2014, 2016, 2017 Champs!

GC's Yahoo! H2h League permanent website (offseason roster, constitution, etc.) * Lucky was framed!

Re: 30 team CelticsBlog draft, year two
« Reply #899 on: August 06, 2008, 03:10:29 AM »

Offline LarBrd33

  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21238
  • Tommy Points: 2016
good call
« Last Edit: August 06, 2008, 03:42:05 AM by LarBrd33 »