Author Topic: Celtics sign O'bryant  (Read 102683 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #345 on: July 15, 2008, 12:41:21 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Mark Blount plays lazy now, but when he was properly motivated before his pay day, he was a decent player and put up a good effort. If O'Bryant was the player Blount was, then this deal would be considered a steal.

I'm okay with Powe as our primary big man off the bench, and BBD's "girth" for when more size is needed. I understand its not ideal, but very few teams are perfect, and both Powe and BBD are quality players. (Hopefully BBD can up his intensity about conditioning and Powe can get better at the defensive rotations.)





The problem is it causes this team problems when playing very large teams.   Cleveland in the playoffs is a perfect example. 

Celtics need someone with more length (and have bulk) to throw at the large C when Perk is on the bench.

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #346 on: July 15, 2008, 01:19:46 PM »

Offline hpantazo

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25355
  • Tommy Points: 2756
If the Celtics are contenders at the end of next season, I'd guess Danny will sign a big that is being bought out of their contract. These names would be my guess:

Brad Miller
Jerome James
Dan Gadzuric
Eric Dampier
Mark Blount  :P


I think you raise a good point -- there could be big men available towards the Feb trade deadline as players get bought out.  Add PJ Brown and Pollard to that list, and there could be others.

As MVP notes, there just aren't that many big men available to sign.  In addition to Kurt Thomas (who is really a PF) there is Brian Skinner and Francisco Elson.  I actually like both these players, but other than these two, no one else out there excites me.  Would one of these two be willing to come to the Cs for little money?  We'll see.

good point, and I would also add Alonzo Mourning and Dikembe to that list

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #347 on: July 15, 2008, 01:37:43 PM »

Offline Scintan

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3066
  • Tommy Points: 656
A probable stiff got signed for the sort of money you'd expect a probable stiff to be signed for.  He can be cut easily enough, so I don't really see the problem.

Now, on the other hand, if he prevents the team from signing an actual player in the future, he will have become an issue.  Until then, who cares?


When people are free to do as they please, they usually imitate each other.

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #348 on: July 15, 2008, 03:47:29 PM »

Offline Mon

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 360
  • Tommy Points: 35
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/steve_aschburner/12/21/nelson/index.html

“Nelson always has been fascinated with "bigs," but rarely the traditional or All-Star variety. Instead, he has gone for the likes of Bol, Chris Anstey, Shawn Bradley, Wang Zhizhi or Dirk Nowitzki, arguably the league's ultimate perimeter 7-footer. Give him a low-post, back-to-the-basket, old-fashioned pivot man, though, and you'd almost expect Nellie to get bored.

The trend continues in Golden State, where the Warriors rely nearly as much in the middle on 6-foot-9 Al Harrington as they do on starting center Andris Biedrins, and where Nelson seems already to be down on 7-footer Patrick O'Bryant, the No. 9 pick overall in 2006.”

Just in case there was any doubt that Nelson can't, won't, or shouldn't coach bigs!


Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #349 on: July 15, 2008, 04:20:22 PM »

Offline SShoreFan 2.0

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 629
  • Tommy Points: 201


Patrick O'Bryant



Did anyone else think of Sidney Poitier when they first read his name?
I love my kids, call me a sap - it's true.

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #350 on: July 17, 2008, 05:30:38 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
I'm still confused if we signed this guy to the minimum or not.

From the Herald:

Quote
The Celtics, who yesterday made official the signing of free agent center Patrick O’Bryant (two years at the NBA minimum), had very much wanted to keep Posey, but they would not go to a fourth year. Posey averaged 7.4 points and 4.4 rebounds in 24.6 minutes during the regular season and dropped slightly to 6.7 points and 3.6 rebounds in 22.0 in the playoffs.

From the Globe:

Quote
The Celtics signed the seldom-used 7-foot, 250-pound center yesterday to a two-year, $3 million contract, according to an NBA source. O'Bryant is expected to back up Kendrick Perkins. O'Bryant, 22, was the ninth pick in the 2006 NBA draft, but rarely played during two seasons with the Warriors.

So, which is it? Could it be possible that we're missing something on the vet. minimum rules that would allow for a 3mil. contract to be signed for this guy? Are these simply conflicting sources? Which is the correct one?

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #351 on: July 17, 2008, 06:24:31 AM »

Offline lon3lytoaster

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Word aapp!
I'm still confused if we signed this guy to the minimum or not.

From the Herald:

Quote
The Celtics, who yesterday made official the signing of free agent center Patrick O’Bryant (two years at the NBA minimum), had very much wanted to keep Posey, but they would not go to a fourth year. Posey averaged 7.4 points and 4.4 rebounds in 24.6 minutes during the regular season and dropped slightly to 6.7 points and 3.6 rebounds in 22.0 in the playoffs.

From the Globe:

Quote
The Celtics signed the seldom-used 7-foot, 250-pound center yesterday to a two-year, $3 million contract, according to an NBA source. O'Bryant is expected to back up Kendrick Perkins. O'Bryant, 22, was the ninth pick in the 2006 NBA draft, but rarely played during two seasons with the Warriors.

So, which is it? Could it be possible that we're missing something on the vet. minimum rules that would allow for a 3mil. contract to be signed for this guy? Are these simply conflicting sources? Which is the correct one?

It's three million total, with that second year as a team option. The vet's minimum is around 1.5M, I believe.

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #352 on: July 17, 2008, 06:48:37 AM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
I'm still confused if we signed this guy to the minimum or not.

From the Herald:

Quote
The Celtics, who yesterday made official the signing of free agent center Patrick O’Bryant (two years at the NBA minimum), had very much wanted to keep Posey, but they would not go to a fourth year. Posey averaged 7.4 points and 4.4 rebounds in 24.6 minutes during the regular season and dropped slightly to 6.7 points and 3.6 rebounds in 22.0 in the playoffs.

From the Globe:

Quote
The Celtics signed the seldom-used 7-foot, 250-pound center yesterday to a two-year, $3 million contract, according to an NBA source. O'Bryant is expected to back up Kendrick Perkins. O'Bryant, 22, was the ninth pick in the 2006 NBA draft, but rarely played during two seasons with the Warriors.

So, which is it? Could it be possible that we're missing something on the vet. minimum rules that would allow for a 3mil. contract to be signed for this guy? Are these simply conflicting sources? Which is the correct one?

It's three million total, with that second year as a team option. The vet's minimum is around 1.5M, I believe.

Not even a 10+ vet 1.5M.

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #353 on: July 17, 2008, 09:11:20 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
I'm still confused if we signed this guy to the minimum or not.

From the Herald:

Quote
The Celtics, who yesterday made official the signing of free agent center Patrick O’Bryant (two years at the NBA minimum), had very much wanted to keep Posey, but they would not go to a fourth year. Posey averaged 7.4 points and 4.4 rebounds in 24.6 minutes during the regular season and dropped slightly to 6.7 points and 3.6 rebounds in 22.0 in the playoffs.

From the Globe:

Quote
The Celtics signed the seldom-used 7-foot, 250-pound center yesterday to a two-year, $3 million contract, according to an NBA source. O'Bryant is expected to back up Kendrick Perkins. O'Bryant, 22, was the ninth pick in the 2006 NBA draft, but rarely played during two seasons with the Warriors.

So, which is it? Could it be possible that we're missing something on the vet. minimum rules that would allow for a 3mil. contract to be signed for this guy? Are these simply conflicting sources? Which is the correct one?

One of them has it wrong.

The minimum for O'Bryant is $797,581 this season and $855,189 next.  Two years, $1,652,740.

(As BudweiserCeltic alluded to, the vet minimum for a 10+ year veteran is only $1,262,275, which still isn't at the $1.5 million reported.)

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #354 on: July 17, 2008, 11:36:19 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
One is definitely wrong and as of yet I have yet to see comfirmation of either the Herald's or the Globe's reporting from anyone else.

So the assumption that the LLE is no longer in play may not be accurate and for discussion purposes, until we hear otherwise, maybe we should keep the LLE option of signing another player open.

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #355 on: July 17, 2008, 11:43:48 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
One is definitely wrong and as of yet I have yet to see comfirmation of either the Herald's or the Globe's reporting from anyone else.

Fox Sports initially broke the two year, minimum salary deal, so maybe the Herald was confirmation of that story.  Or, maybe they were just re-reporting it.  Hard to say.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #356 on: July 17, 2008, 11:50:13 AM »

Offline silvershamrocker

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 572
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Believe In The Sleeve
I sure hope we didn't use part of the MLE to sign him, but I'm happy we got another big. I hope Cliff Ray works his magic...  :-\

Now, onto a vet point and a defensive wing...


"It will be fun watching the Lakers get those balloons down one at a time." - Bill Russell

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #357 on: July 17, 2008, 12:09:35 PM »

Offline ChampKind

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3079
  • Tommy Points: 665
  • I left Indiana. Because it was horrible.
O'Bryant is a 2nd round talent that somehow got picked in the lottery.  I expect about 5 mpg and 6 fouls per game from him.
CB Draft Bucks: Chris Paul, Dwight Howard, Tobias Harris, Zach LaVine, Aaron Afflalo, Jeff Green, Donatas Motiejunas, Jarrett Jack, Frank Kaminsky, Lance Stephenson, JaVale McGee, Shane Larkin, Nick Young

DKC Bucks. Also terrible.

http://www.anchorofgold.com

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #358 on: July 17, 2008, 12:41:50 PM »

Offline geraldgreen5

  • Xavier Tillman
  • Posts: 27
  • Tommy Points: 1
O'Bryant is a 2nd round talent that somehow got picked in the lottery.  I expect about 5 mpg and 6 fouls per game from him.

He really isnt that bad when given minutes. When he was in the d-league (which i know is the d league) he avg. 17 points 10 boards and 3.5 blocks in 36 minutes... Now im not expecting him to do that here, i dont think anybody is but give the guy a chance. He played a total of 218 minutes in the nba. He wasnt even given a chance.

http://www.nba.com/dleague/playerfile/index.jsp?player=patrick_obryant

http://www.nba.com/playerfile/patrick_obryant/career_stats.html

Re: Celtics sign O'bryant
« Reply #359 on: July 17, 2008, 01:02:34 PM »

Offline Andy Jick

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3795
  • Tommy Points: 89
  • You know my methods, Watson.
centers always take longer to develop...maybe we got a steal here as he might possibly be a late-bloomer.  afterall, perkins wasn't much to write home about his first couple years, and we have witnessed his growth.

i'm not concerned about this signing at all...if anything i think it's a positive.  it's low money for 2 years - at least it's not a scalabrine-esque contract...
"It was easier to know it than to explain why I know it."