NY Times / The Athletic
Another team with widely reported interest, the Trail Blazers, similarly did not join the chase. A Blazers team source said the Blazers were never enamored with Brown, even before Boston made it known he was available on the trade market.
Two factors went into the Blazers? disinterest: Their analytics viewed him as a negative player and the Celtics? asking price was too high. ?We were never aggressively looking to trade for him,? a team source said. ?And particularly not at their price.?
If this was the case, I do not understand why they were linked so strongly to Jaylen both during the Giannis talks and after the Giannis talks ended. It looked like they had strong interest during both periods.
I believe the 2nd reason that they thought the asking price was too high. That is why they went with Morant who was cheaper. And they could maintain their core team & young talent & draft picks by picking Morant over Jaylen.
If your analytics really show Jaylen as a net negative player, why would you pursue him at all? Because you had no faith in your analytics department? So it doesn't matter one way or another whether the analytics liked him or not. They ignored the analytics department. At least that is what it looks like to me.
This (analytics explanation) feels more like an attempt to write off why they didn't get Jaylen rather than a real reason why they didn't want him.