Author Topic: Time for a change?  (Read 171560 times)

CptZoogs, Vermont Green, Goldstar88, jpotter33, Surferdad and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #570 on: Today at 04:06:41 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Bob Cousy
  • **************************
  • Posts: 26991
  • Tommy Points: 2821
Riley's got to make this trade, doesn't he? He's 82 years old and watched four different East teams win the title in the past decade and none of them were Miami. He's dropped the ball chasing other big names recently and the team has been stuck in play-in mode for years.  I'd be livid if I was a Heat fan and Giannis got away too.
I mean you can also say Stevens has to make the trade. The Bucks want to squeeze everything they can out of moving GA. The Celtics have the better package to offer, Riley has to work with what he has. Tyler Hero, yuk, I mean he is okay, but no one was talking about him being league MVP last year!! Let's be real, plus their pics are not great, especially future pics if they did land GA, future pics are poo poo! I think the Bucks are using Miami to squeeze More out of the Celtics!

I dont think Brad has to make this trade, but he should. It gives the Celtics the best chance to win another championship. Like you said, The Celtics can offer the best trade package since Miami is refusing to move Bam. If the Celtics are not able to get Giannis this is 100% on Brad. Hopefully he gets it done.

Of course it?s on Brad but bottom line for fans and for Brad is what you are willing to trade to get Giannis. I wont blame Brad for having a limit.  I guess I don?t see much of a difference in value with Brown and Giannis. The superiority of Giannis as an impact player is offset by age and health concern. In a best case scenario, Giannis has 4 years at an All-NBA level, which I think would be viewed as a huge win for Boston. JB?s ceiling is probably 6 years as a top 15-20 player. I?m excited for the trade and the potential for the next couple of seasons but with each asset that?s gone I get less enthusiastic about it. And the idea of including Kuzma makes me a little bit ill. Never liked him and don?t want him. Portis or Turner in the right package (again, not giving away too much) feels better. If Hugo is gone or future firsts it won?t make me happy.  I don?t think Brad stops the deal if it?s Hugo v. Baylor but Portis v Kuzma, I hope he holds the line on that. Regardless, I?ve said before and stand by that if Brad is confident about Giannis that?s good enough for me. But at the end of the day if the package gets uncomfortable, I hope he holds the line and says OK Milwaukee, go ahead and get Herro.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #571 on: Today at 04:36:25 PM »

Online celticinorlando

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33482
  • Tommy Points: 864
  • Larry Bird for President
I just do not think they take the Celtics offer. Brown stays put. Brad has to fix the relationship.

They draft at 27 and try to add a center and combo guard somehow.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #572 on: Today at 04:45:44 PM »

Offline No Nickname

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1022
  • Tommy Points: 104
I just do not think they take the Celtics offer. Brown stays put. Brad has to fix the relationship.

They draft at 27 and try to add a center and combo guard somehow.

That's some clever reverse-jinx mojo you've got going on there!

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #573 on: Today at 04:48:50 PM »

Online celticinorlando

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33482
  • Tommy Points: 864
  • Larry Bird for President
I just do not think they take the Celtics offer. Brown stays put. Brad has to fix the relationship.

They draft at 27 and try to add a center and combo guard somehow.

That's some clever reverse-jinx mojo you've got going on there!

I mean it is a real possibility tho. And I am not trading Brown for just parts. Just keep him at that point.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #574 on: Today at 05:21:37 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33881
  • Tommy Points: 1786
  • What a Pub Should Be
There's some irony that exactly 10 years ago, there was a bunch of anticipation of a trade (lots of Jimmy Butler chatter) heading into the 2016 draft.   Never materialized and Jaylen ended up being the pick and staying put.

Also, pretty sure that was the most active draft night thread we ever had due to the trade talk and the whole glut of guys projected at #3 in what was seen as a 2 person draft (Simmons & Ingram).


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #575 on: Today at 05:22:17 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 54905
  • Tommy Points: 2617
If we trade for Giannis, I hope we follow that move by dealing Queta somewhere else. Get a piece that better fits.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #576 on: Today at 05:26:12 PM »

Offline Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 39956
  • Tommy Points: 3516
  • On To Banner 19!
Celtics have explored a reunion with Timelord, per Stein and Fischer
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #577 on: Today at 05:29:14 PM »

Offline smicker16

  • Payton Pritchard
  • Posts: 257
  • Tommy Points: 35
If we trade for Giannis, I hope we follow that move by dealing Queta somewhere else. Get a piece that better fits.

Yeah if they do get Giannis what they do to fill out the roster will be very interesting. I wonder if there would be a chance Queta goes in the deal too as an asset back to the Bucks. I would not want to deal Queta just because of the poor fit though. I like Queta but if including him saves you Hugo and/or a pick would that be something people would want? I am pretty torn on that.

I do think if we get Giannis we would also be getting someone else from the Bucks Portis, Kuzma or Turner. Kuzma really does not intrigue me as the positional overlap between him, Giannis and Tatum really does not interest me.

I imagine Brad would have other ideas for who he would want to target but will be interesting if it the Giannis deal ends up happening.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #578 on: Today at 05:38:38 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Bob Cousy
  • **************************
  • Posts: 26991
  • Tommy Points: 2821
If we trade for Giannis, I hope we follow that move by dealing Queta somewhere else. Get a piece that better fits.

I don?t see why Q doesn?t fit. Our only 7 footer. I get playing Giannis and Q together isn?t ideal, but if GA is going to play some center here, I see Q as a great backup. Could you see a lineup with Q, GA, JT, DW/Baylor, PP working? I could see Q developing his shot. He shoots FTs well and I think has shown some shooting ability that could be developed.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #579 on: Today at 05:42:24 PM »

Online jambr380

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14126
  • Tommy Points: 2105
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
I just do not think they take the Celtics offer. Brown stays put. Brad has to fix the relationship.

They draft at 27 and try to add a center and combo guard somehow.

That's some clever reverse-jinx mojo you've got going on there!

I'm pretty sure he's still going to be saying that we aren't trading Brown even if Giannis is holding up the championship trophy in a Celtics jersey next year. Celticinorlando has been extremely consistent in thinking the Celtics are going to do nothing this offseason

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #580 on: Today at 05:45:40 PM »

Online jambr380

  • Cedric Maxwell
  • **************
  • Posts: 14126
  • Tommy Points: 2105
  • Sometimes there's no sane reason for optimism
If we trade for Giannis, I hope we follow that move by dealing Queta somewhere else. Get a piece that better fits.

I don?t see why Q doesn?t fit. Our only 7 footer. I get playing Giannis and Q together isn?t ideal, but if GA is going to play some center here, I see Q as a great backup. Could you see a lineup with Q, GA, JT, DW/Baylor, PP working? I could see Q developing his shot. He shoots FTs well and I think has shown some shooting ability that could be developed.

Yeah, our biggest problem last year was only having one playable big. Giannis will play some Center, but he's not full time at that position. I get that Giannis and Queta aren't the best match together offensively in terms of spreading the floor, but they'd be amazing defensively and we definitely have enough minutes to spread around.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #581 on: Today at 05:51:06 PM »

Online Roy H.

  • Forums Manager
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 64620
  • Tommy Points: -25360
  • Bo Knows: Joe Don't Know Diddley
If we trade for Giannis, I hope we follow that move by dealing Queta somewhere else. Get a piece that better fits.

I don?t see why Q doesn?t fit. Our only 7 footer. I get playing Giannis and Q together isn?t ideal, but if GA is going to play some center here, I see Q as a great backup. Could you see a lineup with Q, GA, JT, DW/Baylor, PP working? I could see Q developing his shot. He shoots FTs well and I think has shown some shooting ability that could be developed.

It's certainly not ideal for Joe's preferred offense.  That's not ideal for a coach that is poor at making adjustments.  I guess there's a possibility that Queta develops an outside shot like Aron Baynes, but I haven't seen much potential there.
I'M THE SILVERBACK GORILLA IN THIS MOTHER... AND DON'T NONE OF YA'LL EVER FORGET IT!

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #582 on: Today at 05:52:03 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Bob Cousy
  • **************************
  • Posts: 26991
  • Tommy Points: 2821
I just do not think they take the Celtics offer. Brown stays put. Brad has to fix the relationship.

They draft at 27 and try to add a center and combo guard somehow.

That's some clever reverse-jinx mojo you've got going on there!

I'm pretty sure he's still going to be saying that we aren't trading Brown even if Giannis is holding up the championship trophy in a Celtics jersey next year. Celticinorlando has been extremely consistent in thinking the Celtics are going to do nothing this offseason

In a sense, Orlando is already wrong. I think the smoke is pretty clearly there indicating Brad is at least competing for a blockbuster trade. If it doesn?t happen I don?t think it will be for lack of effort. Bucks get to decide and none of us would want Brad to overpay.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #583 on: Today at 05:57:10 PM »

Offline Neurotic Guy

  • Bob Cousy
  • **************************
  • Posts: 26991
  • Tommy Points: 2821
If we trade for Giannis, I hope we follow that move by dealing Queta somewhere else. Get a piece that better fits.

I don?t see why Q doesn?t fit. Our only 7 footer. I get playing Giannis and Q together isn?t ideal, but if GA is going to play some center here, I see Q as a great backup. Could you see a lineup with Q, GA, JT, DW/Baylor, PP working? I could see Q developing his shot. He shoots FTs well and I think has shown some shooting ability that could be developed.

It's certainly not ideal for Joe's preferred offense.  That's not ideal for a coach that is poor at making adjustments.  I guess there's a possibility that Queta develops an outside shot like Aron Baynes, but I haven't seen much potential there.

Hah! Looks like a shooter trapped inside a large body to me. I bet he?s shooting 1000 threes a day.  It will be fascinating to see whether Joe can adjust. Adding Giannis as a major offensive cog will force some change and we?ll be able to observe how on target TennS is in his Joe assessment. I fear he and you are spot on with regard to Joe. We?ll see.

Re: Time for a change?
« Reply #584 on: Today at 06:00:01 PM »

Offline MattyIce

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2310
  • Tommy Points: 756
I just do not think they take the Celtics offer. Brown stays put. Brad has to fix the relationship.

They draft at 27 and try to add a center and combo guard somehow.

who's 1) Brad's with JB cause by this trade speculation or 2) JB with the other issues going on behind the scene....  I don't see #2 being fixed, although as I said after the season ended, he'll give it a shot if he cant get a trade done to his satisfaction