Author Topic: Celtics News  (Read 1998538 times)

cdcd, lbgreen33 and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #1995 on: Yesterday at 11:45:11 PM »

Offline Csfan1984

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8881
  • Tommy Points: 290
Honestly, if the Celtics end up with Queta, Garza & Williams as their center rotation, is this the worst center rotation in the teams history?
Andrew DeClerq, Knight and Tarbak. That center group collectively was giving us 10 and 10 with more TOs than blks over 40 mins.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #1996 on: Today at 12:25:18 AM »

Offline slightly biased bias fan

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1439
  • Tommy Points: 322
Honestly, if the Celtics end up with Queta, Garza & Williams as their center rotation, is this the worst center rotation in the teams history?
Andrew DeClerq, Knight and Tarbak. That center group collectively was giving us 10 and 10 with more TOs than blks over 40 mins.

Haha, good example.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:40:07 AM by slightly biased bias fan »

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #1997 on: Today at 07:11:29 AM »

Offline boscel33

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2841
  • Tommy Points: 173
Honestly, if the Celtics end up with Queta, Garza & Williams as their center rotation, is this the worst center rotation in the teams history?
Andrew DeClerq, Knight and Tarbak. That center group collectively was giving us 10 and 10 with more TOs than blks over 40 mins.

94-95:  Eric Montross, Acie Earl, Pervis Ellison.  Montross was 10/7, Acie was 2/1, Pervis was 7/6.
"There's sharks and minnows in this world. If you don't know which you are, you ain't a shark."

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #1998 on: Today at 08:39:04 AM »

Online Neurotic Guy

  • Tommy Heinsohn
  • *************************
  • Posts: 25566
  • Tommy Points: 2721
Honestly, if the Celtics end up with Queta, Garza & Williams as their center rotation, is this the worst center rotation in the teams history?
Andrew DeClerq, Knight and Tarbak. That center group collectively was giving us 10 and 10 with more TOs than blks over 40 mins.

94-95:  Eric Montross, Acie Earl, Pervis Ellison.  Montross was 10/7, Acie was 2/1, Pervis was 7/6.

I'm curious about what Queta might do with a starting role and regular minutes.  He's big, moves well, rebounds, can score inside, good hands.  Does anyone else think that 2025-26 could bring some solid development for Q and he could emerge as a decent starter - if not eventually a strong backup?