The Raptors are going to punt on another traditional big man and take Marques Johnson. I'm running into a meeting so I don't have the time for a huge write-up but...Paul Westphal's All-NBA teammate was good at everything. Passing and leading an offense, low post efficiency from the wing position, a nice outside shot, absolutely excellent defense. He's simply great.
So that rounds out my first five. Penny - Westphal - Johnson - Jones - Gasol. We'll likely look for a little more beef up front at some point, but I like the offensive explosiveness of the backcourt, the passing 1-5, the range from everyone but Jones, and the extraordinary team defense of the 3-5 on top of above average play in the defensive backcourt. And good teammates all the way around.
Marques Johnson is a candidate for the most well-rounded SF in this draft. He is a 7 or 8 out of 10 at every single skill you want your SF to have.
He can post. He can hit the midrange. The outside shot. He was very good in transition. He can move without the ball. He could play point forward. He had handles. He had passing ability. He was a strong defensive player. He was the best defender on that team until Moncrief came of age and even then he was the 2nd best defender. It is a shame he never got on an All-Defensive team. A strong rebounder to finish it all off.
The other candidates for most well-rounded SF would be McGrady and Grant Hill who both went in the top 5 of the draft. Sorry, top 2, they were the first and second picks overall. McGrady did not play consistent defense. Grant had a sketchy jump shot. Marques had no weaknesses.
Now maybe you want to tweak it because Grant was a 10 out of 10 type ball-handler and passer and you may still view him as the most well-rounded despite the weakness ... fair enough.
Either way, Marques is a candidate for most well rounded SF. I had 4th on my SF list overall behind the two players named above and Bernard King. I had Marques as a 2nd round pick.
I always feel like Marques was the Paul Pierce type player of his era. Extremely well rounded and just as good or almost as good as the top SFs of his era (minus Bird). As I said in the past, Marques was to Dr J what Pierce was to Kobe. Less fanfare but almost as good.
Top playoff performer as well. Some huge runs prior to Moncrief joining the team. More consistent than Moncrief in the post-season afterwards as well. Moncrief went missing in a few of those series in the early 80s. Yet, Marques is remembered so much differently than Moncrief. Not nearly the plaudits.