Lesson in Beal debacle: Under no circumstances do Celtics give Brown trade approval rights. Also hoping he doesn’t negotiate option on his 5 th year, as this will increase his trade value should we reach that decision later on.
Tatum should deserve the NTC more than Brown. Then again I'd also be scared if he demands to go to Lakers or Warriors since he can choose where he wanna play, etc. That is why C's need to win now to please teammates like him, entice them to stay and be happy in green long-term and possibly a franchise player.
Beal being unwilling to discard the no-trade after the deal was apparently a concern for Miami, and it's easy to see how it would have been a concern for Boston as well. Brown needs to be extended soon and he's often talked about how much trade rumors bothered him. If Beal is on the team and he has a no-trade clause, how can you tell a guy that's been on the team much longer that he can't have one? Then Tatum is going to want one, because he should have whatever Brown has. You can see how quickly this becomes a house of cards, in addition to the enormous contract and CBA restrictions they would face.
There are a couple of incorrect statements here.
1) Players don't 'discard' no trade clauses like that - like everything else that's part of the contract, it isnot renegotiated with a new team if the player is traded.
2)As Celtics2021 said above, Brown
cannot receive an NTC on his extension for two reasons:
- You can't add a no trade clause to an extension of a contract that doesn't contain an NTC. (In other words, it has to be a completely new contract/FA situation)
- You have to have eight years of NBA experience when the new contract is negotiated, which Brown doesn't/wouldn't. You're either eligible for an NTC when you sign the new contract or you're not.
Now, Tatum
would be eligible for an NTC with us (and only us) on his next contract, but that's not for 2-3 seasons in the future anyway.