I generally agree we are a little light in talent in the Pritchard - Hauser - Stevens - Brissett group,
however in the context of this team I think it's totally fine. Pritchard and Hauser I feel good about. Pritchard is a pure scorer and everyone needs a microwave off the bench when it's not otherwise working. Here's some commentary on the other three.
Hauser: I don't understand the concern over two games. The guy can shoot. He's 42% for his career from deep and is a serviceable defender. He is
not a focal point for an offense. If he's out on the court with the deep bench, he is not someone who is going to be an offensive engine because he only has one elite skill and the rest of his game is pretty weak offensively. That's okay! He will, at almost all times, but the 4th or 5th best offensive option on the court from a creator / engine perspective. He will hopefully never be one of the top two. If he is, we are screwed anyways. If he's out there with at least three of our top six, he's going to get open looks and he'll knock them down. It's just a totally different scope. Similar to the commentary on how Banton performed well because he was the focal point but wouldn't be successful in other situations. Hauser is not built for that Knicks game setup.
Brissett: I really like his game. I've been saying for a while he's our 7th most important player. He looks strong, athletic, and capable with the ball in his hands. I noticed that when he and Tatum were both in the game, it was Brissett who would pick up guys like Paul Reed. He's going to be useful. Again, he doesn't have to be that good! But he's athletic, can hit open shots, and can do something interesting and athletic with the ball when he has it. That's the spec. We all saw his putback that got disqualified. A couple clips that I absolutely loved:
1 --
https://twitter.com/CelticsRepublic/status/1711400193663353015 -- look at that activity! Tough around the screen and then taking on a much bigger and stronger player. That's terrific. And it's taking the biggest guy on the court with Al out there. That's indicative of the role he can play as a big.
2 --
https://twitter.com/OrgulhoCeltaBR/status/1711180104284491909 -- took a while to track this down. He comes from the other side of the court and outruns a much faster player to get the position and, while he made the shot, influence it and make it much more challenging.
So I'm really excited about Oshae. He's hyper athletic, he's strong. He's offensively limited but totally fine for the 4th or 5th best player out there role. And defensively he's going to be super useful. He's the exact type of guy you want to have to put on Jimmy Butler, Giannis, Durant, Lebron. Athletic, active, not afraid of physicality.
Stevens: More of the same in line with Brissett. What jumped out to me was his ability to dribble / drive and run the offense. He was more of a point forward than I expected. I find him a little duplicative with Brissett and I think ultimately one of them gets the bulk of the minutes, but it was cool to see that skillset which I didn't realize was there. His end of quarter or half play to kick out to JD was fun to watch from someone that strong and defensive.
More than anything, these are NBA players who have played 15-20 minutes a game for playoff teams. That's worth something. Anything from Svi, Banton, and Walsh is gravy.
Here's the thing -- conservatively you're going to get 25 from Tatum, 25 from Brown, 17-20 from Zinger, 15 from Jrue, 10 from Al, 10 from White. Because they have to share the ball. If someone gets hurt, all are capable of upping by five points. So that's 100-ish points from those guys even if you haircut. Fine, maybe it ends up at 90-95. Pritchard gets a few shots off to get to 8-10. Hauser throws in a few more. Point is, you don't need more scoring. You need guys like Brissett. That's why I'm excited about him.