For those who want to hear Steve Bulpett carry water for the Celtics organization on the Durant rumors:
https://youtu.be/2ETTA_r_pdU

I just don't buy the premise that Boston wouldn't be better with Durant over the next couple of seasons if they traded Brown and Smart for him, which is seemingly what 2 of the 3 guys were saying. Evan agrees though, Boston is better with Durant over the next couple of seasons than they'd be without making the trade. He was concerned about the long term, but seemed to be the only one of the 3 that acknowledged that Boston would be better in the short term.
So it really comes down to whether or not you think Boston is good enough as presently constructed to realistically win the title over the next couple of seasons. For me that answer is no, which is why I'd make the trade because with Durant for Brown and Smart, Boston is by far the best team in the sport and would be a heavy heavy favorite to win the title.
Durant would definitely be the best player in the deal. However, I feel like the team would be out of balance (in a traditional player position point of view). I would want to know Brad's next move to help balance out the roster, by suring up the backcourt. I prefer Brongdon to be the backup due to his injury history.
At the very least, we'd need to get Curry back in any deal.
I suspect that would be a requirement something like Durant, Curry for Brown, Smart, Grant Williams, 2 1st's.
So post-trade (with 3 open spots)
Starters - White, Brogdon, Durant, Tatum, Rob
Main Rotation - Curry, Pritchard, Gallo, Horford
Deep Bench - Hauser, Vonleh, Kornet, Kabengele, Davison
Add via veteran minimum guys like Howard and Anthony, and keep 1 spot open and I think that team is much better positioned to win a title this season.