https://twitter.com/billsimmons/status/1451014195806289920?s=21 4 FTA and 21 missed shots for Tatum. Go to the effing basket. This is why he’s not an All-NBA guy yet,
Bill Simmons
He's right
He sure is
agreed, except for the “yet” sentiment. as badly as we want it, tatum doesn’t have what it takes between the ears to be elite. his ceiling is very, very good with sporadic elite spurts but he’ll never be the guy to lead a franchise to championship(s).
and before anyone says it, this isn’t solely based on tonight. we’ve seen enough at this point to know who tatum is as a player, teammate, and leader.
Was waiting for the armchair psychology to make an appearance. Here it is!
I don't get how you can type things like that about a 23 year-old All-Star and All-NBA player that you've never met without cringing.
lol, armchair psychology? and what does meeting him have to do with it? anyone who has objectively watched JT for the past four years realizes that his basketball IQ is lacking and it’s limiting his potential. his game has progressed physically but he isn’t maturing mentally via decision making and floor/game awareness and leadership.
he’s also making the same egregious mistakes he’s made for four years and he doesn’t posses the ability to adapt his game (especially when his shot isn’t falling). granted, tonight was a rare extreme example but JT demonstrated all the bad traits he’s refused to improve on since his rookie year. when his shot is falling, he’s elite, but when it isn’t (which is too often for an elite player) he’s an average player. he hasn’t improved in this regard in four years. he also checks out mentally for long stretches of a game when he’s not playing well. these are facts and not traits of an elite player.
feel free to bookmark this post and get back to me in a year, or two, or three. i guarantee JT will be the exact same player, but as an older vet, the word “potential” won’t be buoying his future prospects. i’ll gladly eat crow if i’m wrong, but unfortunately, i don’t think i am.
I will happily revisit this ludicrous post. Given he's improved every year I like the chances of him continuing to, and if he only tops out as a 27/7/4 guy on slightly above average efficiency then he's a perennial All-Star forward
not to poke my way in here, but I think Mahk may feel 'elite' = top 5 player, not all star level.
I feel that you can hold both of these thoughts at the same time and not be a complete fool
1. Tatum is a great player, only 23, obviously getting better all the time, all star level
2. Tatum does not seem to adjust well during games when his shooting is off. Tonight he totally should have gotten to the rim more instead of chucking 15 threes. I tend to agree with Mahk in that Tatum won't be 'elite'=ie top 5 level of player until he can accept those nights where his shot just isn't going down, and shift gears and get to the rim more, or be a big decoy and find the open man more. Like tonight, we had a guy completely going off all night and there were a lot opportunities for Tatum to dish to an open brown and an open Timelord, but for whatever reason we got more 3 point attempts.
I think both #1 and #2 can both be true. It is also true that Tatum might get a lot better at #2 during this year and next year.